• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

仪表盘调查问卷揭示老年驾驶员对车辆仪表盘设计的态度和偏好

Older Drivers' Attitudes and Preferences about Instrument Cluster Designs in Vehicles Revealed by the Dashboard Questionnaire.

作者信息

Swain Thomas A, Snyder Scott W, McGwin Gerald, Huisingh Carrie E, Seder Thomas, Owsley Cynthia

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 University Boulevard, Suite 609, Birmingham AL 35233 USA.

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1665 University Blvd., Birmingham AL 35294-0022 USA.

出版信息

Cogn Technol Work. 2023 Feb;25(1):65-74. doi: 10.1007/s10111-022-00710-6. Epub 2022 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1007/s10111-022-00710-6
PMID:38516201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10956641/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Older drivers are a rapidly growing demographic group worldwide; many have visual processing impairments. Little is known about their preferences about vehicle instrument cluster design.

METHODS

We evaluated the psychometric properties of a questionnaire on "dashboard" design for a population-based sample of 1000 older drivers. Topics included gauges, knobs/switches, and interior lighting; items were statements about their visual design. Response options used a Likert-scale ("Definitely True" to "Definitely False"). Factor and Rasch analyses identified underlying subscales.

RESULTS

Driver responses revealed four thematic subscales fitting the Rasch model: cognitive processing, lighting, pattern recognition, and obstructions. Internal consistency of subscales was acceptable (0.70-0.87); all possessed a sufficiently unidimensional structure. Opportunities for improvement were identified (item scope, category ordering, discrimination of respondents' perception levels).

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of motor vehicle dashboard preferences indicated cognitive processing, lighting, pattern recognition, and obstructions are areas relevant to older drivers. Future work will examine the relationship between older drivers' visual function (e.g., contrast sensitivity, visual processing speed) and their design preferences as revealed by the Dashboard Questionnaire, with the aim to optimize instrument cluster displays for older drivers.

摘要

背景

在全球范围内,老年驾驶员这一人口群体正在迅速增长;许多人存在视觉处理障碍。关于他们对车辆仪表盘设计的偏好却知之甚少。

方法

我们针对1000名老年驾驶员的基于人群的样本,评估了一份关于“仪表盘”设计问卷的心理测量特性。主题包括仪表、旋钮/开关和车内照明;项目是关于其视觉设计的陈述。回答选项采用李克特量表(“绝对正确”到“绝对错误”)。因子分析和拉施分析确定了潜在的子量表。

结果

驾驶员的回答揭示了符合拉施模型的四个主题性子量表:认知处理、照明、模式识别和障碍物。子量表的内部一致性是可接受的(0.70 - 0.87);所有子量表都具有足够的单维结构。确定了改进的机会(项目范围、类别排序、受访者感知水平的区分)。

结论

对机动车仪表盘偏好的评估表明,认知处理、照明、模式识别和障碍物是与老年驾驶员相关的领域。未来的工作将研究老年驾驶员的视觉功能(如对比敏感度、视觉处理速度)与仪表盘问卷所揭示的他们的设计偏好之间的关系,旨在为老年驾驶员优化仪表盘显示。

相似文献

1
Older Drivers' Attitudes and Preferences about Instrument Cluster Designs in Vehicles Revealed by the Dashboard Questionnaire.仪表盘调查问卷揭示老年驾驶员对车辆仪表盘设计的态度和偏好
Cogn Technol Work. 2023 Feb;25(1):65-74. doi: 10.1007/s10111-022-00710-6. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
2
Associations of visual functions with attitudes about motor vehicle dashboards among older drivers.老年驾驶员的视觉功能与对汽车仪表盘态度之间的关联。
Front Neuroergon. 2022 Aug 12;3:918781. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2022.918781. eCollection 2022.
3
Older drivers' attitudes about instrument cluster designs in vehicles.老年人对车辆仪表板设计的态度。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Nov;43(6):2024-2029. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.05.021. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
4
Towards unpacking older drivers' visual-motor coordination: A gaze-based integrated driving assessment.面向老年驾驶员视觉-运动协调性的剖析:基于注视的综合驾驶评估。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Apr;113:85-96. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.01.019. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
5
Risk to workers or vehicle damage: What makes drivers slow down in work zones?工人风险或车辆损坏:是什么让司机在工作区减速?
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(2):177-181. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1878354. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
6
Motion perception as a risk factor for motor vehicle collision involvement in drivers ≥ 70 years.运动感知能力是 70 岁及以上驾驶员发生机动车碰撞事故的风险因素。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;151:105956. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105956. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
7
Attitudes Toward Four Levels of Self-Driving Technology Among Elderly Drivers.老年驾驶员对四级自动驾驶技术的态度。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 23;12:682973. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.682973. eCollection 2021.
8
Older driver vehicle preferences and perceptions of safety: A survey.
J Safety Res. 2022 Dec;83:223-231. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2022.08.018. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
9
Driving difficulties as reported by older drivers with mild cognitive impairment and without neurological impairment.老年认知障碍但无神经功能障碍患者报告的驾驶困难。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(6):630-635. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1626986. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
10
Dashboard Layout Effects on Drivers' Searching Performance and Heart Rate: Experimental Investigation and Prediction.仪表盘布局对驾驶员搜索绩效和心率的影响:实验研究与预测。
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 14;10:813859. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.813859. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations of visual functions with attitudes about motor vehicle dashboards among older drivers.老年驾驶员的视觉功能与对汽车仪表盘态度之间的关联。
Front Neuroergon. 2022 Aug 12;3:918781. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2022.918781. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the visual and cognitive demands of in-vehicle information systems.评估车载信息系统的视觉和认知需求。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2019 Jun 21;4(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s41235-019-0166-3.
2
Visual and Cognitive Demands of CarPlay, Android Auto, and Five Native Infotainment Systems.CarPlay、Android Auto 及五种原生信息娱乐系统的视觉和认知需求。
Hum Factors. 2019 Dec;61(8):1371-1386. doi: 10.1177/0018720819836575. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
3
Vision and Aging.视觉与衰老。
Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2016 Oct 14;2:255-271. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-111815-114550.
4
A psychometric assessment of the St. George's respiratory questionnaire in patients with COPD using Rasch model analysis.使用拉施模型分析对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者进行圣乔治呼吸问卷的心理测量评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Aug 20;13:131. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0320-7.
5
A population-based examination of the visual and ophthalmological characteristics of licensed drivers aged 70 and older.一项针对 70 岁及以上有照驾驶员的视觉和眼科特征的基于人群的检查。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013 May;68(5):567-73. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls185. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
6
Ergonomic and usability analysis on a sample of automobile dashboards.对汽车仪表盘样本进行的人体工程学与可用性分析。
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:1507-14. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0345-1507.
7
Older drivers' attitudes about instrument cluster designs in vehicles.老年人对车辆仪表板设计的态度。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Nov;43(6):2024-2029. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.05.021. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
8
When can information from ordinal scale variables be integrated?有序尺度变量的信息何时可以整合?
Psychol Methods. 2010 Dec;15(4):398-412. doi: 10.1037/a0021462.
9
Aging and human performance.衰老与人类表现。
Hum Factors. 2008 Jun;50(3):548-55. doi: 10.1518/001872008X312161.
10
Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States.美国成年人视力障碍的成因及患病率。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;122(4):477-85. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.4.477.