Dublin Jerome High School, Dublin, Ohio, USA.
Department of Pathology, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Cytopathology. 2024 Jul;35(4):464-472. doi: 10.1111/cyt.13373. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
The Visiopharm artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for oestrogen receptor (ER) immunohistochemistry (IHC) in whole slide images (WSIs) has been successfully validated in surgical pathology. This study aimed to assess its efficacy in cytology specimens.
The study cohort comprised 105 consecutive cytology specimens with metastatic breast carcinoma. ER IHC WSIs were seamlessly integrated into the Visiopharm platform from the Image Management System (IMS) during our routine digital workflow, and an AI algorithm was employed for analysis. ER AI scores were compared with pathologists' manual consensus scores. Optimization steps were implemented and evaluated to reduce discordance.
The overall concordance between pathologists' scores and AI scores was excellent (99/105, 94.3%). Six cases exhibited discordant results, including two false-negative (FN) cases due to abundant histiocytes incorrectly counted as negatively stained tumour cells by AI, two FN cases owing to weak staining, and two false-positive (FP) cases where pigmented macrophages were erroneously counted as positively stained tumour cells by AI. The Pearson correlation coefficient of ER-positive percentages between pathologists' and AI scores was 0.8483. Optimization steps, such as lowering the cut-off threshold and additional training using higher input magnification, significantly improved accuracy.
The automated ER AI algorithm demonstrated excellent concordance with pathologists' assessments and accurately differentiated ER-positive from ER-negative metastatic breast carcinoma cytology cases. However, precision in identifying tumour cells in cytology specimens requires further enhancement.
用于全切片图像(WSI)中雌激素受体(ER)免疫组织化学(IHC)的 Visiopharm 人工智能(AI)算法已在外科病理学中成功验证。本研究旨在评估其在细胞学标本中的功效。
研究队列包括 105 例连续的转移性乳腺癌细胞学标本。在我们的常规数字工作流程中,从图像管理系统(IMS)无缝地将 ER IHC WSI 集成到 Visiopharm 平台中,并使用 AI 算法进行分析。将 ER AI 评分与病理学家的手动共识评分进行比较。实施并评估了优化步骤以减少不匹配。
病理学家评分与 AI 评分之间的总体一致性非常好(99/105,94.3%)。有 6 例结果不一致,包括 2 例由于 AI 错误地将大量组织细胞计为阴性染色的肿瘤细胞而导致的假阴性(FN)病例,2 例由于染色较弱而导致的 FN 病例,以及 2 例由于 AI 错误地将色素巨噬细胞计为阳性染色的肿瘤细胞而导致的假阳性(FP)病例。病理学家和 AI 评分之间的 ER 阳性百分比的 Pearson 相关系数为 0.8483。降低截止阈值和使用更高输入放大倍数进行额外训练等优化步骤显著提高了准确性。
自动化 ER AI 算法与病理学家的评估具有极好的一致性,并准确地区分了 ER 阳性和 ER 阴性转移性乳腺癌细胞学病例。然而,在识别细胞学标本中的肿瘤细胞方面,需要进一步提高精度。