Department of Preventive Dentistry, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, No. 639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Mar 26;28(4):230. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05610-9.
To compare the effectiveness of using a 0.454% stannous fluoride-containing dentifrice twice daily in relieving dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) in a Chinese population.
This was a single-centre, randomized, controlled, examiner-blind, three-treatment-arm, parallel-group study in participants with clinically diagnosed DH. Subjects who met inclusion criteria (n = 197) were randomly allocated into 3 groups: test group (n = 66)-using a 0.454% stannous fluoride-containing dentifrice twice daily; positive control group (n = 64)-using a 5.0% calcium sodium phosphosilicate-containing dentifrice twice daily; negative control group (n = 67)-using a 1150 ppm of NaF dentifrice twice daily. Status of DH was assessed at week 4 and week 8 by the same independent examiner. Changes from baseline in Schiff sensitivity score, tactile threshold and Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire (DHEQ) score were analysed using analysis of covariance models. The DHEQ evaluated subject-perceived oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL).
Statistically significant improvements in mean Schiff scores (p < 0.0001 for all products at Weeks 4 and 8), tactile threshold (p < 0.0001 for test and negative control at Weeks 4 and 8: Week 4 p = 0.0040 and Week 8 p < 0.0001 for positive control) and all DHEQ scores (p < 0.01 for all groups) were observed. No statistically significant differences were observed in the adjusted mean between all dentifrices at both timepoints, potentially driven by a placebo effect. Forty-two treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported (n = 32 subjects), with 2 serious AEs (n = 1) in the test group. TEAEs were not considered treatment-related.
All groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in Schiff score, tactile threshold and OHRQoL. However, due to a possible placebo effect in the negative control, there were no statistically significant differences between the dentifrices.
This study adds to the growing research exploring why the placebo effect is a common phenomenon in DH studies.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04950465.
比较在中国人群中,每天使用两次含 0.454% 氟化亚锡的牙膏缓解牙本质敏感(DH)的效果。
这是一项在中国进行的单中心、随机、对照、盲法、三治疗臂、平行组研究,纳入了临床诊断为 DH 的患者。符合纳入标准的受试者(n=197)被随机分配到 3 组:试验组(n=66)-每天使用含 0.454% 氟化亚锡的牙膏两次;阳性对照组(n=64)-每天使用含 5.0% 硅酸钠钙的牙膏两次;阴性对照组(n=67)-每天使用含 1150 ppm 氟化钠的牙膏两次。在第 4 周和第 8 周,由同一位独立的检查者评估 DH 状态。采用协方差模型分析基线时 Schiff 敏感评分、触觉阈值和牙本质敏感体验问卷(DHEQ)评分的变化。DHEQ 评估了受试者感知的口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)。
所有产品在第 4 周和第 8 周时,Schiff 评分的平均变化均有统计学意义(所有产品均为 p<0.0001),触觉阈值(试验组和阴性对照组在第 4 周和第 8 周时 p<0.0001:第 4 周时 p=0.0040,第 8 周时 p<0.0001)和所有 DHEQ 评分(所有组均为 p<0.01)均有统计学意义。在两个时间点,所有牙膏之间的调整后平均差异均无统计学意义,这可能是由安慰剂效应驱动的。报告了 42 例治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)(n=32 例受试者),其中试验组有 2 例严重不良事件(n=1)。TEAE 不被认为与治疗相关。
所有组的 Schiff 评分、触觉阈值和 OHRQoL 均有统计学意义的改善。然而,由于阴性对照组可能存在安慰剂效应,因此各组之间没有统计学意义的差异。
本研究增加了越来越多的研究,探索为什么安慰剂效应是 DH 研究中的常见现象。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT04950465。