Suppr超能文献

海岸警卫队勇气在个性与组织承诺关系中的作用。

The role of coast guard courage in the relationship between personality and organizational commitment.

作者信息

Mert Ibrahim Sani, Köksal Kemal

机构信息

School of Business and Social Sciences, Antalya Bilim University, Antalya, Turkey.

Business Faculty, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.

出版信息

Mil Psychol. 2022 Apr 22;34(6):706-721. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2022.2057788. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Courageous behaviors are risky and devoted actions performed primarily for the benefit of others, and they closely relate to many beneficial organizational (e.g., commitment) outcomes. Even courage plays a crucial role in many professions' results; investigating it in military content is a primary issue. This paper examined the relationship between the Big Five personality traits and organizational commitment and the moderator role of courage in this relationship by focusing on coast guards. Cross-sectional survey data (n = 512) were obtained from employees and analyzed using the least square method regression analysis. The results showed that the Conscientiousness trait is a strong antecedent for organizational commitment, and courage emerges as a moderator for the relationship between personality traits and organizational commitment. High courage strengthened the effect of Conscientiousness-Emotional Stability on normative commitment, Extraversion-Agreeableness on affective commitment, Openness on continuance, and normative commitment. Practitioners might recruit high conscientious, agreeable, emotionally stable, and courageous candidates considering correlational and moderating effects.

摘要

勇敢行为是主要为他人利益而采取的有风险且专注的行动,它们与许多有益的组织成果(如承诺)密切相关。甚至勇气在许多职业的成果中也起着关键作用;在军事背景下对其进行研究是一个主要问题。本文以海岸警卫队为研究对象,考察了大五人格特质与组织承诺之间的关系以及勇气在这种关系中的调节作用。通过对员工进行横断面调查获取数据(n = 512),并采用最小二乘法回归分析进行分析。结果表明,尽责性特质是组织承诺的一个重要前因,而勇气成为人格特质与组织承诺之间关系的调节变量。高勇气增强了尽责性 - 情绪稳定性对规范承诺、外向性 - 宜人性对情感承诺、开放性对持续承诺以及规范承诺的影响。考虑到相关性和调节作用,从业者可能会招聘高度尽责、宜人、情绪稳定且勇敢的候选人。

相似文献

1
The role of coast guard courage in the relationship between personality and organizational commitment.
Mil Psychol. 2022 Apr 22;34(6):706-721. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2022.2057788. eCollection 2022.
6
Investigating the Effects of Personality on the Safety Behavior of Gold Mine Workers: A Moderated Mediation Approach.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 30;19(23):16054. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316054.
8
Courage: A Potential Mediator of the Relationship Between Personality and Social Anxiety.
Psychol Stud (Mysore). 2022;67(1):53-62. doi: 10.1007/s12646-022-00641-2. Epub 2022 Mar 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Person-Organization Fit in a military selection context.
Mil Psychol. 2020 Feb 26;32(3):237-246. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2020.1724752. eCollection 2020.
2
Validation of the TAPAS for predicting in-unit soldier outcomes.
Mil Psychol. 2020 Feb 4;32(1):24-35. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1652484. eCollection 2020.
3
Examining personality for the selection and classification of soldiers: Validity and differential validity across jobs.
Mil Psychol. 2020 Feb 4;32(1):60-70. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1652482. eCollection 2020.
4
Predictors of attitudes and performance in U.S. Army recruiters: Does personality matter?
Mil Psychol. 2020 Feb 4;32(1):81-90. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1652486. eCollection 2020.
6
Measurement Model Quality, Sample Size, and Solution Propriety in Confirmatory Factor Models.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2006 Mar 1;41(1):65-83. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4101_5.
8
Short assessment of the Big Five: robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing.
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Jun;43(2):548-67. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0066-z.
9
Personality and citizenship behavior: the mediating role of job satisfaction.
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jul;94(4):945-59. doi: 10.1037/a0013329.
10
Conscientiousness and reactions to psychological contract breach: a longitudinal field study.
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Sep;93(5):1183-93. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1183.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验