Suppr超能文献

理解组织承诺:人格五因素模型和文化的元分析检验

Understanding organizational commitment: A meta-analytic examination of the roles of the five-factor model of personality and culture.

机构信息

Department of Management and Marketing, Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Melbourne.

Department of Human Resource Management, Fox School of Business, Temple University.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2015 Sep;100(5):1542-67. doi: 10.1037/apl0000014. Epub 2015 Mar 30.

Abstract

We examined the relationships between the Five-Factor Model (FFM) of personality traits and three forms of organizational commitment (affective, normative, and continuance commitment) and their variability across individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Meta-analytic results based on 55 independent samples from 50 studies (N = 18,262) revealed that (a) all FFM traits had positive relationships with affective commitment; (b) all FFM traits had positive relationships with normative commitment; and (c) Emotional Stability, Extraversion, and Openness to Experience had negative relationships with continuance commitment. In particular, Agreeableness was found to be the trait most strongly related to both affective and normative commitment. The results also showed that Agreeableness had stronger relationships with affective and normative commitment in collectivistic cultures than in individualistic cultures. We provide theoretical and practical implications of these findings for personality, job attitudes, and employee selection and retention.

摘要

我们考察了人格特质的五因素模型(FFM)与三种组织承诺形式(情感承诺、规范承诺和持续承诺)之间的关系,以及它们在个人主义和集体主义文化中的变化。基于来自 50 项研究的 55 个独立样本的元分析结果表明:(a)FFM 的所有特质都与情感承诺呈正相关;(b)FFM 的所有特质都与规范承诺呈正相关;(c)情绪稳定性、外向性和开放性与持续承诺呈负相关。特别是,宜人性与情感承诺和规范承诺都有最强的关系。研究结果还表明,在集体主义文化中,宜人性与情感承诺和规范承诺的关系比在个人主义文化中更强。我们为个性、工作态度以及员工选拔和留用提供了这些发现的理论和实际意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验