• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基因组估计育种值对栽培番茄(Solanum lycopersicum L.)果实性状预测的准确性。

Prediction accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values for fruit traits in cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.).

机构信息

Department of Bioindustry and Bioresource Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Plant Engineering Research Institute, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Mar 27;24(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-04934-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12870-024-04934-8
PMID:38539100
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10976779/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Genomic selection (GS) is an efficient breeding strategy to improve quantitative traits. It is necessary to calculate genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) for GS. This study investigated the prediction accuracy of GEBVs for five fruit traits including fruit weight, fruit width, fruit height, pericarp thickness, and Brix. Two tomato germplasm collections (TGC1 and TGC2) were used as training populations, consisting of 162 and 191 accessions, respectively.

RESULTS

Large phenotypic variations for the fruit traits were found in these collections and the 51K Axiom SNP array generated confident 31,142 SNPs. Prediction accuracy was evaluated using different cross-validation methods, GS models, and marker sets in three training populations (TGC1, TGC2, and combined). For cross-validation, LOOCV was effective as k-fold across traits and training populations. The parametric (RR-BLUP, Bayes A, and Bayesian LASSO) and non-parametric (RKHS, SVM, and random forest) models showed different prediction accuracies (0.594-0.870) between traits and training populations. Of these, random forest was the best model for fruit weight (0.780-0.835), fruit width (0.791-0.865), and pericarp thickness (0.643-0.866). The effect of marker density was trait-dependent and reached a plateau for each trait with 768-12,288 SNPs. Two additional sets of 192 and 96 SNPs from GWAS revealed higher prediction accuracies for the fruit traits compared to the 31,142 SNPs and eight subsets.

CONCLUSION

Our study explored several factors to increase the prediction accuracy of GEBVs for fruit traits in tomato. The results can facilitate development of advanced GS strategies with cost-effective marker sets for improving fruit traits as well as other traits. Consequently, GS will be successfully applied to accelerate the tomato breeding process for developing elite cultivars.

摘要

背景

基因组选择(GS)是一种提高数量性状的有效育种策略。需要计算 GS 的基因组估计育种值(GEBV)。本研究调查了 GEBV 对五个果实性状(包括果实重量、果实宽度、果实高度、果皮厚度和 Brix)的预测准确性。两个番茄种质资源收集(TGC1 和 TGC2)用作训练群体,分别包含 162 和 191 个个体。

结果

在这些收集物中发现了果实性状的大表型变异,并且 51K Axiom SNP 阵列产生了可靠的 31,142 个 SNP。使用不同的交叉验证方法、GS 模型和标记集在三个训练群体(TGC1、TGC2 和组合)中评估了预测准确性。对于交叉验证,LOOCV 在跨性状和训练群体方面非常有效。参数(RR-BLUP、Bayes A 和贝叶斯 LASSO)和非参数(RKHS、SVM 和随机森林)模型显示了不同的预测准确性(0.594-0.870),不同性状和训练群体之间。其中,随机森林是果实重量(0.780-0.835)、果实宽度(0.791-0.865)和果皮厚度(0.643-0.866)的最佳模型。标记密度的影响是依赖于性状的,对于每个性状,768-12,288 SNP 达到了一个平台。来自 GWAS 的另外两组 192 和 96 个 SNP 显示了比 31,142 SNP 和八个子集更高的果实性状预测准确性。

结论

本研究探讨了一些因素,以提高番茄果实性状的 GEBV 预测准确性。结果可以促进开发具有成本效益的标记集的先进 GS 策略,以提高果实性状以及其他性状。因此,GS 将成功应用于加速番茄的育种过程,以开发优秀的品种。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b67/10976779/735146b5bf1c/12870_2024_4934_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b67/10976779/7ba03a7fc7cf/12870_2024_4934_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b67/10976779/4a364b807ece/12870_2024_4934_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b67/10976779/1cf9dc2cb6fe/12870_2024_4934_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b67/10976779/56f6296fef76/12870_2024_4934_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b67/10976779/735146b5bf1c/12870_2024_4934_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b67/10976779/7ba03a7fc7cf/12870_2024_4934_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b67/10976779/4a364b807ece/12870_2024_4934_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b67/10976779/1cf9dc2cb6fe/12870_2024_4934_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b67/10976779/56f6296fef76/12870_2024_4934_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b67/10976779/735146b5bf1c/12870_2024_4934_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values for fruit traits in cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.).基因组估计育种值对栽培番茄(Solanum lycopersicum L.)果实性状预测的准确性。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Mar 27;24(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-04934-8.
2
Low-density SNP markers with high prediction accuracy of genomic selection for bacterial wilt resistance in tomato.用于番茄青枯病抗性基因组选择的具有高预测准确性的低密度单核苷酸多态性标记
Front Plant Sci. 2024 May 30;15:1402693. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1402693. eCollection 2024.
3
Genetic architecture of fresh-market tomato yield.鲜食番茄产量的遗传结构。
BMC Plant Biol. 2023 Jan 9;23(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-04018-5.
4
Evaluation of methods and marker Systems in Genomic Selection of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.).油棕(Elaeis guineensis Jacq.)基因组选择中方法和标记系统的评估
BMC Genet. 2017 Dec 11;18(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12863-017-0576-5.
5
Genome-wide association study identifies QTL for eight fruit traits in cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.).全基因组关联研究确定了栽培番茄(Solanum lycopersicum L.)八个果实性状的数量性状基因座。
Hortic Res. 2021 Sep 1;8(1):203. doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00638-4.
6
Optimizing genomic selection of agricultural traits using K-wheat core collection.利用K型小麦核心种质优化农业性状的基因组选择
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jun 14;14:1112297. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1112297. eCollection 2023.
7
Effects of marker density and population structure on the genomic prediction accuracy for growth trait in Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei.标记密度和群体结构对凡纳滨对虾生长性状基因组预测准确性的影响
BMC Genet. 2017 May 17;18(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12863-017-0507-5.
8
Genomic selection for fruit quality traits in apple (Malus×domestica Borkh.).苹果(Malus×domestica Borkh.)果实品质性状的基因组选择。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036674. Epub 2012 May 4.
9
Genomic prediction of agronomic traits in wheat using different models and cross-validation designs.利用不同模型和交叉验证设计对小麦农艺性状进行基因组预测。
Theor Appl Genet. 2021 Jan;134(1):381-398. doi: 10.1007/s00122-020-03703-z. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
10
GWAS Based on RNA-Seq SNPs and High-Throughput Phenotyping Combined with Climatic Data Highlights the Reservoir of Valuable Genetic Diversity in Regional Tomato Landraces.基于 RNA-Seq SNPs 和高通量表型与气候数据的 GWAS 突出了区域番茄地方品种宝贵遗传多样性的蕴藏。
Genes (Basel). 2020 Nov 23;11(11):1387. doi: 10.3390/genes11111387.

引用本文的文献

1
AI-Powered Plant Science: Transforming Forestry Monitoring, Disease Prediction, and Climate Adaptation.人工智能助力植物科学:变革林业监测、疾病预测与气候适应。
Plants (Basel). 2025 May 26;14(11):1626. doi: 10.3390/plants14111626.
2
Integration of machine learning and genome-wide association study to explore the genomic prediction accuracy of agronomic trait in oats (Avena sativa L.).整合机器学习与全基因组关联研究以探究燕麦(Avena sativa L.)农艺性状的基因组预测准确性。
Plant Genome. 2025 Mar;18(1):e20549. doi: 10.1002/tpg2.20549.
3
Hybrid Prediction in Horticulture Crop Breeding: Progress and Challenges.

本文引用的文献

1
Genomic selection with fixed-effect markers improves the prediction accuracy for Capsaicinoid contents in .使用固定效应标记的基因组选择提高了辣椒素含量的预测准确性。
Hortic Res. 2022 Sep 13;9:uhac204. doi: 10.1093/hr/uhac204. eCollection 2022.
2
Genomic prediction of morphometric and colorimetric traits in Solanaceous fruits.茄科果实形态测量和比色特征的基因组预测
Hortic Res. 2022 Mar 23;9:uhac072. doi: 10.1093/hr/uhac072. eCollection 2022.
3
Tomato genomic prediction for good performance under high-temperature and identification of loci involved in thermotolerance response.
园艺作物育种中的杂交预测:进展与挑战
Plants (Basel). 2024 Oct 4;13(19):2790. doi: 10.3390/plants13192790.
番茄在高温下良好表现的基因组预测及耐热性响应相关基因座的鉴定
Hortic Res. 2021 Oct 1;8(1):212. doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00647-3.
4
Genome-wide association study identifies QTL for eight fruit traits in cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.).全基因组关联研究确定了栽培番茄(Solanum lycopersicum L.)八个果实性状的数量性状基因座。
Hortic Res. 2021 Sep 1;8(1):203. doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00638-4.
5
Integrated genomic selection for rapid improvement of crops.用于作物快速改良的综合基因组选择
Genomics. 2021 May;113(3):1070-1086. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
6
Applications of Support Vector Machine in Genomic Prediction in Pig and Maize Populations.支持向量机在猪和玉米群体基因组预测中的应用
Front Genet. 2020 Dec 3;11:598318. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.598318. eCollection 2020.
7
Genomic Selection for Prediction of Fruit-Related Traits in Pepper ( spp.).用于预测辣椒( 属)果实相关性状的基因组选择
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Oct 28;11:570871. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.570871. eCollection 2020.
8
Genome-wide association studies and whole-genome prediction reveal the genetic architecture of KRN in maize.全基因组关联研究和全基因组预测揭示了玉米 KRN 的遗传结构。
BMC Plant Biol. 2020 Oct 27;20(1):490. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02676-x.
9
Genome-wide association study and genomic selection for soybean chlorophyll content associated with soybean cyst nematode tolerance.全基因组关联研究和基因组选择在与大豆胞囊线虫耐性相关的大豆叶绿素含量方面的应用。
BMC Genomics. 2019 Nov 27;20(1):904. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6275-z.
10
Improving grain yield, stress resilience and quality of bread wheat using large-scale genomics.利用大规模基因组学提高面包小麦的产量、抗逆性和品质。
Nat Genet. 2019 Oct;51(10):1530-1539. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0496-6. Epub 2019 Sep 23.