• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响意大利1918年流感大流行期间公众遵守感染控制措施水平的社会文化因素:一种历史研究方法

The Socio-Cultural Factors Influencing the Level of Public Compliance with Infection Control Measures during the 1918 Influenza Pandemic in Italy: A Historical Approach.

作者信息

Tognotti Eugenia, Dettori Marco

机构信息

Center for Anthropological, Paleopathological and Historical Studies of Sardinian and the Mediterranean Populations, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy.

Department of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 20;12(6):694. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060694.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare12060694
PMID:38540658
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10969780/
Abstract

During health emergencies, non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are adopted in various combinations until a vaccine can be produced and widely administered. Containment strategies, including the closure of schools, churches, and dance halls; banning of mass gatherings; mandatory mask wearing; isolation; and disinfection/hygiene measures, require reasonable compliance to be successfully implemented. But what are the most effective measures? To date, few systematic studies have been conducted on the effects of various interventions used in past epidemics/pandemics. Important contributions to our understanding of these questions can be obtained by investigating the historical data from the great influenza pandemic of 1918, an event widely considered one of the greatest natural disasters in human history. Taking on particular importance is the study of the possible role played by the behaviour of the population and the lack of public obedience to the non-pharmaceutical interventions in a Mediterranean country like Italy-one of the most affected countries in Europe-during that pandemic, with special attention paid to the weight of the socio-cultural factors which hindered the ultimate goal of containing the spread of the virus and preventing excess deaths in the country.

摘要

在突发卫生事件期间,会采取各种组合的非药物干预措施(NPIs),直到能够生产并广泛接种疫苗。防控策略包括关闭学校、教堂和舞厅;禁止大规模集会;强制佩戴口罩;隔离;以及消毒/卫生措施,这些措施需要民众合理配合才能成功实施。但哪些措施最为有效呢?迄今为止,针对过去流行病/大流行中所采用的各种干预措施的效果,几乎没有进行过系统性研究。通过调查1918年大流感大流行的历史数据,可以为我们理解这些问题做出重要贡献,这一事件被广泛认为是人类历史上最严重的自然灾害之一。尤其重要的是研究在意大利这样一个地中海国家,在那次大流行期间民众行为以及对非药物干预措施缺乏公众服从可能起到的作用,意大利是欧洲受影响最严重的国家之一,特别要关注阻碍该国控制病毒传播和防止超额死亡这一最终目标的社会文化因素的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a767/10969780/ab01bbb3f7f8/healthcare-12-00694-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a767/10969780/4fc8372317ff/healthcare-12-00694-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a767/10969780/ab01bbb3f7f8/healthcare-12-00694-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a767/10969780/4fc8372317ff/healthcare-12-00694-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a767/10969780/ab01bbb3f7f8/healthcare-12-00694-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Socio-Cultural Factors Influencing the Level of Public Compliance with Infection Control Measures during the 1918 Influenza Pandemic in Italy: A Historical Approach.影响意大利1918年流感大流行期间公众遵守感染控制措施水平的社会文化因素:一种历史研究方法
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 20;12(6):694. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060694.
2
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.物理干预措施以阻断或减少呼吸道病毒的传播。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 30;1(1):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6.
3
First Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy: Data and Evidence.意大利的 COVID-19 大流行第一波:数据和证据。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1353:91-113. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-85113-2_6.
4
The effectiveness of governmental nonpharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 at controlling seasonal influenza transmission: an ecological study.政府非药物干预措施对 COVID-19 控制季节性流感传播的效果:一项生态学研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Apr 4;22(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07317-2.
5
Lifting non-pharmaceutical interventions following the COVID-19 pandemic - the quiet before the storm?解除新冠肺炎大流行后的非药物干预措施——暴风雨前的宁静?
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2022 Nov;21(11):1541-1553. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2022.2117693. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
6
Behavioural responses to influenza pandemics: what do we know?对流感大流行的行为反应:我们了解什么?
PLoS Curr. 2009 Sep 9;1:RRN1037. doi: 10.1371/currents.rrn1037.
7
Community Mitigation Guidelines to Prevent Pandemic Influenza - United States, 2017.《2017年美国预防大流行性流感的社区缓解指南》
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2017 Apr 21;66(1):1-34. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6601a1.
8
Estimating the effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions to mitigate COVID-19 spread in Saudi Arabia.估计非药物干预措施对减轻沙特阿拉伯 COVID-19 传播的影响。
BMC Med. 2022 Feb 7;20(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02232-4.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Pandemic preparedness: perceptions of vulnerable migrants in Thailand towards WHO-recommended non-pharmaceutical interventions: a cross-sectional study.大流行防范:泰国弱势移民对世卫组织推荐的非药物干预措施的认知:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jun 28;14:665. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-665.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in Excess Winter Mortality (EWM) from 1900/01 to 2019/20-Evidence for a Complex System of Multiple Long-Term Trends.从 1900/01 年到 2019/20 年的冬季超额死亡率(EWM)趋势——多个长期趋势的复杂系统证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 14;19(6):3407. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063407.
2
Reassessing the Global Mortality Burden of the 1918 Influenza Pandemic.重新评估 1918 年流感大流行的全球死亡负担。
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Dec 1;187(12):2561-2567. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy191.
3
Lessons from the history of quarantine, from plague to influenza A.
从鼠疫到甲型流感,隔离历史中的经验教训。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2013 Feb;19(2):254-9. doi: 10.3201/eid1902.120312.
4
Estimated imported infections of Chikungunya and Dengue in Italy, 2008 to 2011.2008 年至 2011 年意大利估计输入性基孔肯雅热和登革热感染病例。
J Travel Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;19(5):294-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2012.00640.x. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
5
Mortality burden of the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic in Europe.1918 - 1919年欧洲流感大流行的死亡负担。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2009 May;3(3):99-106. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2009.00080.x.
6
Nonpharmaceutical interventions implemented during the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic.1918 - 1919年流感大流行期间实施的非药物干预措施。
JAMA. 2007 Nov 21;298(19):2260-1; author reply 2261. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.19.2260-b.
7
Nonpharmaceutical interventions implemented by US cities during the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic.美国各城市在1918 - 1919年流感大流行期间实施的非药物干预措施。
JAMA. 2007 Aug 8;298(6):644-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.6.644.
8
Pandemic influenza: studying the lessons of history.大流行性流感:汲取历史教训
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 1;104(18):7313-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702659104. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
9
Public health interventions and epidemic intensity during the 1918 influenza pandemic.1918年流感大流行期间的公共卫生干预措施与疫情强度
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 1;104(18):7582-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610941104. Epub 2007 Apr 6.
10
The effect of public health measures on the 1918 influenza pandemic in U.S. cities.公共卫生措施对美国城市1918年流感大流行的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 1;104(18):7588-93. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611071104. Epub 2007 Apr 6.