Department of CSE, Christian College of Engineering and Technology, Dindigul, India.
Department of AI and DS, PSNA College of Engineering and Technology, Dindigul, India.
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 29;14(1):7453. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55991-w.
The recent developments in quantum technology have opened up new opportunities for machine learning algorithms to assist the healthcare industry in diagnosing complex health disorders, such as heart disease. In this work, we summarize the effectiveness of QuEML in heart disease prediction. To evaluate the performance of QuEML against traditional machine learning algorithms, the Kaggle heart disease dataset was used which contains 1190 samples out of which 53% of samples are labeled as positive samples and rest 47% samples are labeled as negative samples. The performance of QuEML was evaluated in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, F1 score, and training time against traditional machine learning algorithms. From the experimental results, it has been observed that proposed quantum approaches predicted around 50.03% of positive samples as positive and an average of 44.65% of negative samples are predicted as negative whereas traditional machine learning approaches could predict around 49.78% of positive samples as positive and 44.31% of negative samples as negative. Furthermore, the computational complexity of QuEML was measured which consumed average of 670 µs for its training whereas traditional machine learning algorithms could consume an average 862.5 µs for training. Hence, QuEL was found to be a promising approach in heart disease prediction with an accuracy rate of 0.6% higher and training time of 192.5 µs faster than that of traditional machine learning approaches.
最近量子技术的发展为机器学习算法提供了新的机会,以协助医疗保健行业诊断复杂的健康障碍,如心脏病。在这项工作中,我们总结了 QuEML 在心脏病预测中的有效性。为了评估 QuEML 对传统机器学习算法的性能,我们使用了 Kaggle 心脏病数据集,其中包含 1190 个样本,其中 53%的样本被标记为阳性样本,其余 47%的样本被标记为阴性样本。我们根据准确性、精度、召回率、特异性、F1 分数和训练时间来评估 QuEML 对传统机器学习算法的性能。从实验结果可以看出,所提出的量子方法预测了大约 50.03%的阳性样本为阳性,平均 44.65%的阴性样本被预测为阴性,而传统的机器学习方法可以预测大约 49.78%的阳性样本为阳性,44.31%的阴性样本为阴性。此外,我们还测量了 QuEML 的计算复杂度,它的训练平均消耗 670µs,而传统的机器学习算法的训练平均消耗 862.5µs。因此,与传统的机器学习方法相比,QuEL 在心脏病预测方面是一种很有前途的方法,其准确率高出 0.6%,训练时间快 192.5µs。