• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

3D打印钛合金椎间融合器在前外侧腰椎椎间融合治疗退变性腰椎疾病中的应用

3D-printed titanium alloy cage in anterior and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease.

作者信息

Donaldson Christopher, Santro Tomislav, Awad Mohammed, Morokoff Andrew

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Department of Radiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

J Spine Surg. 2024 Mar 20;10(1):22-29. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-120. Epub 2024 Mar 14.

DOI:10.21037/jss-23-120
PMID:38567003
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10982926/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The most commonly used cages for intervertebral disc replacement in lumbar fusion procedures are made predominantly from polyetheretherketone (PEEK). There is sufficient data studying their subsidence and failure rates from a variety of approaches. A novel implant is now available for commercial use, 3D-printed porous titanium (3DppTi) alloy cages, which have recently become available for use in spinal procedures. They have been shown in ovine models to have superior efficacy and fusion rates compared to traditional cages. However, there is limited data on their use in clinical practice and long-term outcomes associated with them.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed, of all patients in a single institution who underwent lumbar spine fusion surgery via an anterior or lateral approach with a 3D-printed titanium alloy cage, between January 2020 and February 2021. Clinic letters, imaging and operation reports were independently reviewed to assess for fusion, or evidence of subsidence on follow-up.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were identified as meeting inclusion criteria, with a total of 66 operative levels. Of these operative levels, 32 were via an anterior approach and 34 via a lateral approach. One patient demonstrated a Marchi grade 0 subsidence, with recurrence of radiculopathy 2 months after an anterior approach, requiring posterior decompression and stabilization. A second patient demonstrated a Marchi grade 1 subsidence after a lateral approach, but did not require further surgery as they were asymptomatic at 2 years of follow-up. This study demonstrated an overall subsidence rate of 3.03%. There was a median follow-up time of 11.3 months for all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

3D-printed titanium alloy cages demonstrate a lower subsidence rate compared to historically published rates for alternative intervertebral cages, in anterior and lateral lumbar spine fusion surgery.

摘要

背景

腰椎融合手术中最常用的椎间盘置换椎间融合器主要由聚醚醚酮(PEEK)制成。有足够的数据从多种方法研究其下沉率和失败率。一种新型植入物现已可供商业使用,即3D打印多孔钛(3DppTi)合金椎间融合器,最近已可用于脊柱手术。在绵羊模型中,它们已被证明与传统椎间融合器相比具有更高的疗效和融合率。然而,关于它们在临床实践中的使用以及与之相关的长期结果的数据有限。

方法

对2020年1月至2021年2月期间在单一机构接受前路或侧路3D打印钛合金椎间融合器腰椎融合手术的所有患者进行回顾性病历审查。独立审查临床信件、影像学和手术报告,以评估融合情况或随访时的下沉证据。

结果

确定50例患者符合纳入标准,共有66个手术节段。在这些手术节段中,32个通过前路,34个通过侧路。1例患者表现为马尔基0级下沉,前路手术后2个月出现神经根病复发,需要后路减压和固定。第2例患者在侧路手术后表现为马尔基1级下沉,但由于在2年随访时无症状,无需进一步手术。本研究显示总体下沉率为3.03%。所有患者的中位随访时间为11.3个月。

结论

在腰椎前路和侧路融合手术中,3D打印钛合金椎间融合器的下沉率低于历史上公布的其他椎间融合器的下沉率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6a2/10982926/e9eb4aaab90c/jss-10-01-22-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6a2/10982926/3d0b722b1645/jss-10-01-22-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6a2/10982926/e9eb4aaab90c/jss-10-01-22-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6a2/10982926/3d0b722b1645/jss-10-01-22-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6a2/10982926/e9eb4aaab90c/jss-10-01-22-f2.jpg

相似文献

1
3D-printed titanium alloy cage in anterior and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease.3D打印钛合金椎间融合器在前外侧腰椎椎间融合治疗退变性腰椎疾病中的应用
J Spine Surg. 2024 Mar 20;10(1):22-29. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-120. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
2
Subsidence after lateral lumbar interbody fusion using a 3D-printed porous titanium interbody cage: single-institution case series.使用3D打印多孔钛椎间融合器行腰椎侧方椎间融合术后的沉降:单机构病例系列
J Neurosurg Spine. 2022 May 20;37(5):663-669. doi: 10.3171/2022.4.SPINE2245. Print 2022 Nov 1.
3
Evaluation of cage subsidence in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: novel 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage.评估单纯侧路腰椎间融合术中的 cage 沉降:新型 3D 打印钛网与聚醚醚酮(PEEK) cage 的比较。
Eur Spine J. 2021 Aug;30(8):2377-2384. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06912-2. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
4
PEEK versus titanium cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis of subsidence.PEEK 与钛笼在腰椎侧路椎间融合术中的比较:沉降的分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Sep;49(3):E10. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.FOCUS20367.
5
Graft subsidence and reoperation after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a propensity score-matched and cost analysis of polyetheretherketone versus 3D-printed porous titanium interbodies.侧路腰椎椎体间融合术后移植物沉降和再次手术:聚醚醚酮与 3D 打印多孔钛椎间融合器的倾向评分匹配和成本分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 May 12;39(2):187-195. doi: 10.3171/2023.4.SPINE22492. Print 2023 Aug 1.
6
Comparison of Lumbar Interbody Fusion with 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Cage Versus Polyetheretherketone Cage in Treating Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.3D打印多孔钛笼与聚醚醚酮笼用于腰椎椎间融合治疗腰椎退行性疾病的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
World Neurosurg. 2024 Mar;183:144-156. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.12.111. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
7
Comparison between Three-Dimensional Printed Titanium and PEEK Cages for Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial.三维打印钛笼与 PEEK cage 用于颈椎和腰椎椎间融合的比较:一项前瞻性对照试验。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Nov;15(11):2889-2900. doi: 10.1111/os.13896. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
8
Bilateral implantation of low-profile interbody fusion cages: subsidence, lordosis, and fusion analysis.双侧植入低轮廓椎间融合器:下沉、前凸及融合分析。
Spine J. 2003 Sep-Oct;3(5):377-87. doi: 10.1016/s1529-9430(03)00145-1.
9
Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Versus Polyetheretherketone Cages for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review of Comparative In Vitro, Animal, and Human Studies.用于腰椎椎间融合的三维打印钛笼与聚醚醚酮笼:体外、动物和人体对比研究的系统评价
Neurospine. 2023 Jun;20(2):451-463. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346244.122. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
10
Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model.3D 打印多孔钛合金的骨内生长潜力:体内羊腰椎融合模型中椎间笼材料的直接比较。
Spine J. 2018 Jul;18(7):1250-1260. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Efficacy of a Novel Titanium Cage System in ALIF and LLIF: A Retrospective Clinical and Radiographic Analysis.评估新型钛笼系统在经前路腰椎椎间融合术(ALIF)和斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(LLIF)中的疗效:一项回顾性临床和影像学分析。
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 17;14(16):5814. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165814.
2
Anterior lumbar interbody fusion implants: a narrative review of current trends and future directions.腰椎前路椎间融合植入物:当前趋势与未来方向的叙述性综述
J Spine Surg. 2025 Jun 27;11(2):328-338. doi: 10.21037/jss-24-114. Epub 2025 May 6.
3
Radiological evaluation of fusion patterns after Lateral Lumbar Interbody fusion with 3D-printed porous titanium cages vs. conventional titanium cages.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison between Three-Dimensional Printed Titanium and PEEK Cages for Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial.三维打印钛笼与 PEEK cage 用于颈椎和腰椎椎间融合的比较:一项前瞻性对照试验。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Nov;15(11):2889-2900. doi: 10.1111/os.13896. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
2
Comparison of Fusion, Subsidence, and Clinical Results Between 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Cage and Polyetheretherketone Cage in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Minimum of 2 Years Follow-Up.3D打印多孔钛笼与聚醚醚酮笼在腰椎后路椎间融合术中融合、沉降及临床结果的比较:至少2年随访
World Neurosurg. 2023 Sep;177:e732-e741. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.06.132. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
3
3D打印多孔钛笼与传统钛笼用于腰椎侧方椎间融合术后融合模式的影像学评估
Front Surg. 2024 Oct 15;11:1446792. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1446792. eCollection 2024.
Graft subsidence and reoperation after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a propensity score-matched and cost analysis of polyetheretherketone versus 3D-printed porous titanium interbodies.
侧路腰椎椎体间融合术后移植物沉降和再次手术:聚醚醚酮与 3D 打印多孔钛椎间融合器的倾向评分匹配和成本分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 May 12;39(2):187-195. doi: 10.3171/2023.4.SPINE22492. Print 2023 Aug 1.
4
Subsidence Rates Associated With Porous 3D-Printed Versus Solid Titanium Cages in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中多孔3D打印与实心钛笼相关的沉降率
Global Spine J. 2024 Sep;14(7):1889-1898. doi: 10.1177/21925682231157762. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
5
Fusion assessment in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages.独立式腰椎椎间融合术中的融合评估:3D打印钛笼与聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合器的比较
J Spine Surg. 2022 Sep;8(3):323-332. doi: 10.21037/jss-22-17.
6
Comparison Between 3-Dimensional-Printed Titanium and Polyetheretherketone Cages: 1-Year Outcome After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.三维打印钛笼与聚醚醚酮椎间融合器的比较:微创经椎间孔椎间融合术后1年的结果
Neurospine. 2022 Sep;19(3):524-532. doi: 10.14245/ns.2244140.070. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
7
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Silicon Nitride and Biomaterial Modulus as it Relates to Subsidence Risk in Spinal Fusion Surgery.一项关于氮化硅与生物材料模量及其与脊柱融合手术沉降风险关系的系统评价和荟萃分析。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2022 Sep 9;12:100168. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100168. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
Subsidence after lateral lumbar interbody fusion using a 3D-printed porous titanium interbody cage: single-institution case series.使用3D打印多孔钛椎间融合器行腰椎侧方椎间融合术后的沉降:单机构病例系列
J Neurosurg Spine. 2022 May 20;37(5):663-669. doi: 10.3171/2022.4.SPINE2245. Print 2022 Nov 1.
9
Comparison of Short-Term Radiographical and Clinical Outcomes After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With a 3D Porous Titanium Alloy Cage and a Titanium-Coated PEEK Cage.采用三维多孔钛合金椎间融合器和钛涂层聚醚醚酮椎间融合器行腰椎后路椎间融合术后短期影像学和临床疗效的比较
Global Spine J. 2022 Jun;12(5):931-939. doi: 10.1177/2192568220972334. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
10
PEEK versus titanium cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis of subsidence.PEEK 与钛笼在腰椎侧路椎间融合术中的比较:沉降的分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Sep;49(3):E10. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.FOCUS20367.