• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心力衰竭患者中风患病率的种族/民族差异。

Racial-Ethnic disparities in stroke prevalence among patients with heart failure.

机构信息

Division of Stroke, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Neurology, Division of Neurology Clinical Outcomes Research and Population Science and the Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2024 May;123:173-178. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.03.035. Epub 2024 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2024.03.035
PMID:38583373
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11045301/
Abstract

Racial-ethnic disparities exist in the prevalence and outcomes of heart failure (HF) and are presumed to be related to differences in cardiovascular risk factor burden and control. There is little data on stroke disparities among patients with HF or the factors responsible. We hypothesized disparities in stroke prevalence exist among patients with HF in a manner not fully explained by burden of cardiovascular disease. We analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2014). Cardiovascular profiles were compared by race/ethnicity. Using survey-weighted models, effect modification of the relationship between HF and stroke by race/ethnicity was examined adjusting for cardiovascular profiles. Of 40,437 participants, 2.5 % had HF. The HF cohort had a greater proportion of White and Black participants (77 % vs 74 % and 15 % vs 12 %, respectively) and fewer participants of Hispanic ethnicity (8 % vs 14 %). Stroke was 8 times more prevalent in HF (19.6 % vs 2.3 %, <0.001). Among individuals with HF, race-ethnic differences were identified in the prevalence and mean values of vascular risk factors but were largely driven by higher rates in Black participants. There was significant interaction between HF and race/ethnicity; HF increased the odds of stroke over 7-fold in participants of Hispanic ethnicity (aOR: 7.84; 95 % CI: 4.11-15.0) but to a lesser extent in Black and White participants (Black aOR: 2.49; 95 % CI: 1.72-3.60; White aOR: 3.36; 95 % CI: 2.57-4.40). People of Hispanic ethnicity with HF have a disproportionately higher risk of stroke in a manner not fully explained by differences in vascular risk profiles.

摘要

在心力衰竭(HF)的患病率和结局方面存在种族和民族差异,据推测与心血管危险因素负担和控制方面的差异有关。关于 HF 患者中风差异以及导致这些差异的因素的数据很少。我们假设 HF 患者中风的患病率存在差异,这种差异不能完全用心血管疾病负担来解释。我们分析了 1999-2014 年全国健康和营养调查(National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey)的数据。按种族/民族比较心血管特征。使用调查加权模型,调整心血管特征后,检查 HF 与中风之间的关系是否存在种族/民族的效应修饰。在 40437 名参与者中,有 2.5%患有 HF。HF 队列中白人和黑人参与者的比例更高(分别为 77%和 15%,而 74%和 12%),西班牙裔参与者的比例较低(8%和 14%)。HF 患者中风的患病率高 8 倍(19.6%和 2.3%,<0.001)。在 HF 患者中,血管危险因素的患病率和平均值存在种族和民族差异,但主要是由于黑人参与者的比例较高。HF 和种族/民族之间存在显著的相互作用;西班牙裔参与者的 HF 使中风的几率增加了 7 倍以上(优势比[aOR]:7.84;95%可信区间[CI]:4.11-15.0),而黑人和白人参与者的程度较小(黑人 aOR:2.49;95% CI:1.72-3.60;白人 aOR:3.36;95% CI:2.57-4.40)。患有 HF 的西班牙裔人群的中风风险不成比例地升高,这种风险升高的程度不能完全用血管风险特征的差异来解释。

相似文献

1
Racial-Ethnic disparities in stroke prevalence among patients with heart failure.心力衰竭患者中风患病率的种族/民族差异。
J Clin Neurosci. 2024 May;123:173-178. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.03.035. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
2
Race-ethnicity, age, and heart failure in ischemic stroke.种族-民族、年龄与缺血性脑卒中的心衰。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024 Aug;33(8):107809. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107809. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
3
Disparities in heart failure between White, Black, and Hispanic young adults: insights from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.白种人、黑种人和西班牙裔年轻成年人心力衰竭的差异:来自全国健康和营养检查调查的见解。
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Jan-Dec;18:17539447241239814. doi: 10.1177/17539447241239814.
4
Racial and ethnic disparities in cardiovascular disease - analysis across major US national databases.心血管疾病的种族和民族差异——对美国主要国家数据库的分析。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2024 Jun;116(3):258-270. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2024.01.022. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
5
Impact of Body Mass Index on Heart Failure by Race/Ethnicity From the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) Registry.从 Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure(GWTG-HF)注册研究看体质指数对心力衰竭的影响:按种族/民族划分。
JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Mar;6(3):233-242. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.11.011. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
6
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Referral to Outpatient Heart Failure Management at Hospital Discharge: A Get With The Guidelines Analysis.出院时门诊心力衰竭管理转诊中的种族和民族差异:一项遵循指南分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Mar 18;14(6):e036900. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036900. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
7
Evaluating the Reliability and Robustness of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities in Cardiometabolic Disease in NHANES, NHIS, and BRFSS (2015-2021).评估美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)、美国国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)和美国行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS,2015 - 2021年)中心血管代谢疾病方面种族和族裔健康差异的可靠性和稳健性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Mar 4;14(5):e040029. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.040029. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
8
Racial and ethnic differences in outcomes in older patients with acute ischemic stroke.老年急性缺血性卒中患者预后的种族和民族差异。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 May 1;6(3):284-92. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000211. Epub 2013 May 16.
9
Racial and ethnic differences in perception of provider cultural competence among patients with depression and anxiety symptoms: a retrospective, population-based, cross-sectional analysis.抑郁和焦虑症状患者感知提供者文化能力的种族和民族差异:一项回顾性、基于人群、横断面分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;8(11):957-968. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00285-6. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
10
Differences in Cardiovascular Health at the Intersection of Race, Ethnicity, and Sexual Identity.种族、民族和性认同交叉点的心血管健康差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e249060. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.9060.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiovascular Disease Patterns, Mortality, and Hospitalization Trends in Adults Over 18: Insights From the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Database.18岁以上成年人的心血管疾病模式、死亡率及住院趋势:来自行为危险因素监测系统数据库的见解
Cureus. 2024 Aug 10;16(8):e66604. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66604. eCollection 2024 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Historical Redlining, Social Determinants of Health, and Stroke Prevalence in Communities in New York City.历史上的红线政策、健康的社会决定因素与纽约市社区中风的患病率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e235875. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.5875.
2
Stroke Prevention After Cryptogenic Stroke.不明原因卒中后的卒中预防。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021 Oct 16;23(12):174. doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01604-1.
3
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.心脏病与中风统计-2021 更新:美国心脏协会报告。
Circulation. 2021 Feb 23;143(8):e254-e743. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
4
Trends in the Prevalence of Self-reported Heart Failure by Race/Ethnicity and Age From 2001 to 2016.2001 年至 2016 年按种族/民族和年龄划分的自我报告心力衰竭患病率趋势。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Dec 1;5(12):1425-1429. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.3654.
5
Race and Ethnic Disparities in Stroke Incidence in the Northern Manhattan Study.北方曼哈顿研究中的中风发病率的种族和民族差异。
Stroke. 2020 Apr;51(4):1064-1069. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028806. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
6
Black/Hispanic Disparities in a Vulnerable Post-Stroke Home Care Population.脆弱的脑卒中后居家护理人群中的黑人和西班牙裔差异。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019 Jun;6(3):525-535. doi: 10.1007/s40615-018-00551-y. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
7
Vital Signs: Recent Trends in Stroke Death Rates - United States, 2000-2015.生命体征:美国2000 - 2015年中风死亡率的近期趋势
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Sep 8;66(35):933-939. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6635e1.
8
National Differences in Trends for Heart Failure Hospitalizations by Sex and Race/Ethnicity.按性别和种族/族裔划分的心力衰竭住院趋势的国家差异。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Jul;10(7). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003552.
9
Racial Disparities in Risks of Stroke.中风风险中的种族差异。
N Engl J Med. 2017 May 25;376(21):2089-2090. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1616085.
10
Heart Failure Hospitalization by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Age in California: Implications for Prevention.加利福尼亚州按种族/民族、性别和年龄划分的心力衰竭住院情况:对预防的影响。
Ethn Dis. 2016 Jul 21;26(3):345-54. doi: 10.18865/ed.26.3.345.