Sharma Anita, Rana Shelly, Gupta Bhanu, Ranaut Aditi, Khanoria Rita, Bhardwaj Neha
Department of Anaesthesiology, Dr. R.P. Government Medical College, Tanda, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Indian J Anaesth. 2024 Apr;68(4):323-328. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_258_23. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
Peri-capsular nerve group (PENG) block is a novel ultrasound (US)-guided technique to achieve regional analgesia in hip fractures. We compared the effectiveness of two doses of 0.25% bupivacaine (20 mL and 15 mL) in the US-guided PENG block for positioning patients for sub-arachnoid block (SAB) during hip fracture surgery.
The randomised trial included 60 patients aged 40-90 years undergoing hip fracture surgery under SAB. PENG block was given by a US-guided approach with the patient in a supine position 20 minutes before SAB, and a total of 20 mL and 15 mL of bupivacaine (0.25%) were given in groups A and B, respectively. The primary outcome was to measure and compare the ease of positioning (EOP) of patients for the conduct of SAB. The secondary outcome was the pain assessment at rest and 15° leg raise position at baseline and 10 and 20 minutes post block using the verbal analogue scale (VAS). Continuous variables were compared using the -test, and categorical variables were analysed using Pearson's Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.
The mean (standard deviation) grade of EOP for SAB was significantly better in group A (2.47 (0.73) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.19-2.69)) than in group B (1.86 (0.62) (95% CI: 1.65-2.1)) ( = 0.001). The decrease in VAS scores was significantly higher in group A compared to group B at resting and 15° leg raise position at all-time points ( < 0.05).
A dose of 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine shows better outcomes than 15 mL regarding the patient's positioning during the SAB.
关节囊周围神经组(PENG)阻滞是一种新型的超声引导技术,用于在髋部骨折中实现区域镇痛。我们比较了两种剂量的0.25%布比卡因(20毫升和15毫升)在超声引导下PENG阻滞中,对髋部骨折手术患者蛛网膜下腔阻滞(SAB)定位的有效性。
这项随机试验纳入了60例年龄在40 - 90岁、接受SAB下髋部骨折手术的患者。在SAB前20分钟,患者仰卧位,采用超声引导进行PENG阻滞,A组和B组分别给予20毫升和15毫升的布比卡因(0.25%)。主要结局是测量并比较患者进行SAB时的定位 ease of positioning(EOP)。次要结局是使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)在基线、阻滞后10分钟和20分钟时,评估静息时以及腿部抬高15°位置的疼痛情况。连续变量采用t检验进行比较,分类变量采用Pearson卡方检验或Fisher精确检验进行分析。
A组SAB的EOP平均(标准差)评分(2.47(0.73)(95%置信区间[CI]:2.19 - 2.69))显著优于B组(1.86(0.62)(95%CI:1.65 - 2.1))(P = 0.001)。在所有时间点的静息和腿部抬高15°位置,A组的VAS评分下降幅度均显著高于B组(P < 0.05)。
在SAB期间患者定位方面,20毫升0.25%布比卡因的剂量比15毫升显示出更好的效果。