Barry Tasmin, Holliday Mark, Sparks Jenny, Biggs Rowan, Colman Atalie, Lamb Rebekah, Oldfield Karen, Shortt Nick, Kerse Kyley, Martindale John, Eathorne Allie, Walton Michaela, Black Bianca, Harwood Matire, Bruce Pepa, Semprini Ruth, Bush Andrew, Fleming Louise, Byrnes Catherine A, McNamara David, Hatter Lee, Dalziel Stuart R, Weatherall Mark, Beasley Richard
Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
ERJ Open Res. 2024 Apr 8;10(2). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00897-2023. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Asthma is the most common chronic childhood respiratory condition globally. Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-formoterol reliever-based regimens reduce the risk of asthma exacerbations compared with conventional short-acting β-agonist (SABA) reliever-based regimens in adults and adolescents. The current limited evidence for anti-inflammatory reliever therapy in children means it is unknown whether these findings are also applicable to children. High-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are needed.
The study aim is to determine the efficacy and safety of budesonide-formoterol reliever alone or maintenance and reliever therapy (MART) compared with standard therapy: budesonide or budesonide-formoterol maintenance, both with terbutaline reliever, in children aged 5 to 11 years with mild, moderate and severe asthma.
A 52-week, multicentre, open-label, parallel group, phase III, two-sided superiority RCT will recruit 400 children aged 5 to 11 years with asthma. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to either budesonide-formoterol 100/6 µg Turbuhaler reliever alone or MART; or budesonide or budesonide-formoterol Turbuhaler maintenance, with terbutaline Turbuhaler reliever. The primary outcome is moderate and severe asthma exacerbations as rate per participant per year. Secondary outcomes are asthma control, lung function, exhaled nitric oxide and treatment step change. Assessment of Turbuhaler technique and cost-effectiveness analysis are also planned.
This will be the first RCT to compare the efficacy and safety of a step-wise budesonide-formoterol reliever alone or MART regimen with conventional inhaled ICS or ICS-long-acting β-agonist maintenance plus SABA reliever in children. The results will provide a much-needed evidence base for the treatment of asthma in children.
哮喘是全球最常见的儿童慢性呼吸道疾病。与成人和青少年中基于传统短效β受体激动剂(SABA)缓解剂的治疗方案相比,基于吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)-福莫特罗缓解剂的治疗方案可降低哮喘急性发作的风险。目前关于儿童抗炎缓解剂治疗的证据有限,这意味着这些研究结果是否也适用于儿童尚不清楚。因此需要高质量的随机对照试验(RCT)。
本研究旨在确定在5至11岁患有轻度、中度和重度哮喘的儿童中,单独使用布地奈德-福莫特罗缓解剂或维持与缓解联合疗法(MART)与标准疗法(布地奈德或布地奈德-福莫特罗维持治疗,均联合特布他林缓解剂)相比的疗效和安全性。
一项为期52周、多中心、开放标签、平行组、III期、双侧优效性RCT将招募400名5至11岁的哮喘儿童。参与者将按1:1随机分为单独使用布地奈德-福莫特罗100/6μg都保缓解剂或MART;或布地奈德或布地奈德-福莫特罗都保维持治疗,联合特布他林都保缓解剂。主要结局是中度和重度哮喘急性发作的发生率(每年每名参与者的发作次数)。次要结局包括哮喘控制情况、肺功能、呼出一氧化氮和治疗步骤变化。还计划评估都保装置的使用技术和成本效益分析。
这将是第一项比较单独使用逐步递增的布地奈德-福莫特罗缓解剂或MART方案与传统吸入性ICS或ICS-长效β受体激动剂维持治疗加SABA缓解剂在儿童中的疗效和安全性的RCT。研究结果将为儿童哮喘治疗提供急需的证据基础。