• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三氧化矿物凝聚体、生物活性玻璃和环氧树脂类封闭剂的抗菌效果:一项干预性研究。

Antibacterial Efficacy of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Bioactive Glass and Epoxy-Resin Based Sealer: An Interventional Study.

作者信息

Dutta Saurav Kumar, Singh Chandra Vijay, Hans Manoj Kumar, Bathla Saurav, Singh Varnika, Mishra Soumya

机构信息

Post Graduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Institute of Dental Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Institute of Dental Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Feb;16(Suppl 1):S619-S622. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_901_23. Epub 2024 Feb 29.

DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_901_23
PMID:38595478
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11000902/
Abstract

AIM

The aim and objective of this study was to evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of mineral trioxide aggregate, bioactive glass sealer, and epoxy-resin-based sealer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the present study, 22 Mueller Hinton agar (MH agar) plates were employed and equally divided into two groups. Three holes were made by removal of agar at equidistant points and filled with root canal sealers. The strains of the bacteria used in this study were (ATCC 6538) and (ATCC 10231) and were divided into two groups and root canal sealers were divided into three subgroups: mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) fillapex Sealer, Nishika Bioactive Glass sealer, and Syntex Epoxy Resin base sealer. For , peptone water was placed in a 2 mL test tube and bacteria were extracted from blood agar plates using a nichrome wire loop and poured into the peptone water-containing test tube and incubated for 2 hours and for , fungi were grown at 37°C for 24 hours in MH Broth and seeded into MH agar to produce turbidity of 0.5 on the McFarland scale, which corresponds to a concentration of 10 CFU/mL. This MH broth was used as a second layer. The seeded agar was then added over the plates immediately after the insertion of sealer cement. After incubation, the diameters of zones of inhibition around the plates were measured.

RESULTS

The results of this study showed that the highest inhibition was recorded in Syntex sealer against followed by MTA fillapex sealer and Nishika sealer, whereas MTA fillapex showed the highest inhibition against followed by Syntex sealer and Nishika sealer.

CONCLUSION

Syntex sealer exhibits better antibacterial efficacy against and MTA fillapex exhibit better antibacterial efficacy against .

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估三氧化矿物凝聚体、生物活性玻璃封闭剂和环氧树脂基封闭剂的抗菌效果。

材料与方法

在本研究中,使用了22个穆勒-欣顿琼脂(MH琼脂)平板,并将其平均分为两组。通过在等距点去除琼脂制作三个孔,并用根管封闭剂填充。本研究中使用的细菌菌株为(ATCC 6538)和(ATCC 10231),并分为两组,根管封闭剂分为三个亚组:三氧化矿物凝聚体(MTA)Fillapex封闭剂、Nishika生物活性玻璃封闭剂和Syntex环氧树脂基封闭剂。对于,将蛋白胨水置于2 mL试管中,使用镍铬合金丝环从血琼脂平板中提取细菌并倒入含蛋白胨水的试管中,孵育2小时,对于,真菌在MH肉汤中于37°C培养24小时,然后接种到MH琼脂中,使其在麦氏比浊管上产生0.5的浊度,这相当于浓度为10 CFU/mL。该MH肉汤用作第二层。在插入封闭剂水泥后,立即将接种的琼脂添加到平板上。孵育后,测量平板周围抑菌圈的直径。

结果

本研究结果表明,Syntex封闭剂对的抑菌效果最高,其次是MTA Fillapex封闭剂和Nishika封闭剂,而MTA Fillapex对的抑菌效果最高,其次是Syntex封闭剂和Nishika封闭剂。

结论

Syntex封闭剂对表现出更好的抗菌效果,而MTA Fillapex对表现出更好的抗菌效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3f0/11000902/be316820c646/JPBS-16-619-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3f0/11000902/be316820c646/JPBS-16-619-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3f0/11000902/be316820c646/JPBS-16-619-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Antibacterial Efficacy of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Bioactive Glass and Epoxy-Resin Based Sealer: An Interventional Study.三氧化矿物凝聚体、生物活性玻璃和环氧树脂类封闭剂的抗菌效果:一项干预性研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Feb;16(Suppl 1):S619-S622. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_901_23. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
2
An Invitro Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy and Flow Characteristics for AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, CRCS and Gutta Flow 2 Root Canal Sealer.AH Plus、MTA Fillapex、CRCS和Gutta Flow 2根管封闭剂抗菌效果及流动性的体外评估
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Aug;10(8):ZC104-8. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/20885.8351. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
3
Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Endodontic Sealers against : An Study.不同根管封闭剂的抗菌效果:一项研究。 (你提供的原文似乎不完整,“against”后面缺少具体内容)
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2018 Mar-Apr;8(2):104-109. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_29_18. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
4
Short-Term Antibacterial Efficacy of Three Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers Against Biofilms.三种生物陶瓷根管封闭剂对生物膜的短期抗菌效果
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2020 Mar;54(1):3-9. doi: 10.15644/asc54/1/1.
5
Assessment of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Bioceramic Sealer, Epiphany Self-etch Sealer, and AH-Plus Sealer against : An Study.生物陶瓷封闭剂、Epiphany自酸蚀封闭剂和AH-Plus封闭剂对抗菌效果的评估:一项研究。
Niger J Surg. 2020 Jul-Dec;26(2):104-109. doi: 10.4103/njs.NJS_60_19. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
6
In vitro antimicrobial activity of Fill Canal, Sealapex, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Portland cement and EndoRez.根管充填剂、Sealapex、三氧化矿物凝聚体、波特兰水泥和EndoRez的体外抗菌活性
Int Endod J. 2005 Aug;38(8):539-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00984.x.
7
antimicrobial effect of different root canal sealers against oral pathogens.不同根管封闭剂对口腔病原菌的抗菌作用。
Curr Med Mycol. 2017 Jun;3(2):7-12. doi: 10.18869/acadpub.cmm.3.2.7.
8
Antimicrobial efficacy of calcium silicate-based bioceramic sealers against and - An study.硅酸钙基生物陶瓷封闭剂对……和……的抗菌效果——一项……研究 (原文中部分内容缺失,导致翻译不够完整准确)
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Jul;27(7):737-742. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_215_24. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
9
Comparative Evaluation of Antifungal Efficacy of Five Root Canal Sealers against Clinical Isolates of : A Microbiological Study.五种根管封闭剂对临床分离株抗真菌疗效的比较评价:一项微生物学研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Mar-Apr;13(2):119-123. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1718.
10
A Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability of New MTA Based Sealers with Conventional Resin Based Sealer: An In-vitro Study.新型基于MTA的封闭剂与传统树脂基封闭剂封闭能力的比较评估:一项体外研究。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jul;10(7):ZC76-9. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18909.8194. Epub 2016 Jul 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Antifungal Efficacy of Five Root Canal Sealers against Clinical Isolates of : A Microbiological Study.五种根管封闭剂对临床分离株抗真菌疗效的比较评价:一项微生物学研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Mar-Apr;13(2):119-123. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1718.
2
Bioactive Glass-Based Endodontic Sealer as a Promising Root Canal Filling Material without Semisolid Core Materials.基于生物活性玻璃的根管封闭剂作为一种有前景的不含半固体核心材料的根管充填材料。
Materials (Basel). 2019 Nov 29;12(23):3967. doi: 10.3390/ma12233967.
3
Antibacterial Activity of MTA Fillapex and AH 26 Root Canal Sealers at Different Time Intervals.
MTA Fillapex和AH 26根管封闭剂在不同时间间隔的抗菌活性
Iran Endod J. 2016 Summer;11(3):192-7. doi: 10.7508/iej.2016.03.009. Epub 2016 May 1.
4
Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers.5种根管封闭剂的物理性能
J Endod. 2013 Oct;39(10):1281-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.012. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
5
Evaluation of the biocompatibility of resin-based root canal sealers in rat periapical tissue.评价树脂基根管封闭剂在大鼠根尖周组织中的生物相容性。
Dent Mater J. 2013;32(3):413-9. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2012-218.
6
Antibacterial activity of two MTA-based root canal sealers.两种基于 MTA 的根管封闭剂的抗菌活性。
Int Endod J. 2011 Dec;44(12):1128-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01931.x. Epub 2011 Sep 5.
7
Bacterial leakage with mineral trioxide aggregate or a resin-modified glass ionomer used as a coronal barrier.使用三氧化矿物凝聚体或树脂改性玻璃离子作为冠部屏障时的细菌渗漏。
J Endod. 2004 Nov;30(11):782-4. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200411000-00008.
8
The antimicrobial activity of endodontic sealers to anaerobic bacteria.根管封闭剂对厌氧菌的抗菌活性。
Int Endod J. 1996 Jul;29(4):280-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01382.x.
9
The physical properties of four endodontic sealer cements.
J Endod. 1982 Mar;8(3):126-30. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(82)80248-3.
10
Biologic effects of dental materials. 3. Toxicity and antimicrobial effect of endodontic antiseptics in vitro.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1973 Dec;36(6):856-71. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(73)90338-1.