Helander Anders, Andersson Annika, Villén Tomas
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Drug Test Anal. 2025 Jan;17(1):163-169. doi: 10.1002/dta.3690. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
This study evaluated an alternative routine for reporting urinary chiral amphetamine results in assessment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatment with amphetamine medications and for detecting side-use of illicit racemic amphetamine. Currently in Sweden, only enantiopure d-amphetamine-based ADHD medications (lisdexamphetamine dimesylate and dexamphetamine sulfate) are approved. It is therefore unsuitable to express the chiral result as the l/d-ratio, as before, because l-amphetamine should not be present provided treatment compliance. A new routine for LC-MS/MS chiral amphetamine testing was therefore introduced in 2020, whereby the relative proportion (%) of l-amphetamine and the total amphetamine and creatinine concentrations are reported. Evaluation of the new routine on 24,354 results from 2013 to 2023 revealed that it was useful to distinguish ADHD medication adherence from illicit drug use as the source for a positive test. The l-amphetamine proportion also reflected the enantiomeric content of the medications used. Overall, most results confirmed adherence to ADHD medication, as the l-amphetamine percentage was <1% in 76% of samples (2023) which is the recommended cutoff with enantiopure d-amphetamine medications. However, in all years, illicit drug use was indicated (>40% l-amphetamine) in 8.3%-14.5% of cases. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the clinical value and utility of a new routine for reporting urinary chiral amphetamine results to differentiate adherence to ADHD medication from illicit drug use. Unlike the l/d-amphetamine ratio, it considers differences in total amphetamine concentration and urine dilution, factors that can affect the interpretation.
本研究评估了一种用于报告尿中手性苯丙胺结果的替代程序,该程序用于评估苯丙胺类药物治疗注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的效果以及检测非法消旋苯丙胺的滥用情况。目前在瑞典,仅批准了基于对映体纯d-苯丙胺的ADHD药物(赖氨酸右旋苯丙胺二甲磺酸盐和硫酸右旋苯丙胺)。因此,像以前那样将手性结果表示为l/d-比值是不合适的,因为如果治疗依从性良好,不应存在l-苯丙胺。因此,2020年引入了一种用于液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)手性苯丙胺检测的新程序,该程序报告l-苯丙胺的相对比例(%)以及总苯丙胺和肌酐浓度。对2013年至2023年的24354个结果进行新程序评估发现,它有助于区分ADHD药物依从性与非法药物使用作为阳性检测的来源。l-苯丙胺比例还反映了所用药物的对映体含量。总体而言,大多数结果证实了ADHD药物的依从性,因为在76%的样本(来自2023年)中l-苯丙胺百分比<1%,这是对映体纯d-苯丙胺药物的推荐临界值。然而,在所有年份中,8.3%-14.5%的病例显示存在非法药物使用(l-苯丙胺>40%)。总之,本研究证明了一种用于报告尿中手性苯丙胺结果以区分ADHD药物依从性与非法药物使用的新程序的临床价值和实用性。与l/d-苯丙胺比值不同,它考虑了总苯丙胺浓度和尿液稀释的差异,这些因素会影响结果的解读。