Ivensky Victoria, Zonga Pitchou, Dallaire Gabriel, Desbiens Louis-Charles, Nadeau-Fredette Annie-Claire, Rousseau Guy, Goupil Rémi
Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal, QC, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, QC, Canada.
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2024 Apr 9;11:20543581241234729. doi: 10.1177/20543581241234729. eCollection 2024.
Although blood pressure (BP) control is critical to prevent cardiovascular diseases, hypertension control rates in Canada are in decline.
To assess this issue, we sought to evaluate the differences in antihypertensive medication prescription profiles in the province of Quebec between 2009 and 2021.
This is a retrospective cohort study.
We used data from the CARTaGENE population-based cohort linked to administrative health databases.
Participants with any drug claim in the 6 months prior to the end of follow-up were included.
Guideline-recommended antihypertensive drug prescription profiles were assessed at the time of enrollment (2009-2010) and end of follow-up (March 2021).
Prescriptions practices from the 2 time periods were compared using Pearson's chi-square tests. A sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding participants in which antihypertensive drugs may not have been prescribed solely to treat hypertension (presence of atrial fibrillation/flutter, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, or migraines documented prior to or during follow-up).
Of 8447 participants included in the study, 31.4% and 51.3% filled prescriptions for antihypertensive drugs at the beginning and end of follow-up. In both study periods, guideline-recommended monotherapy was applied in most participants with hypertension (77.9% vs 79.5%, .3), whereas optimal 2 and 3-drug combinations were used less frequently (62.0% vs 61.4%, .77, 51.9% vs 46.7%, .066, respectively). Only the use of long-acting thiazide-like diuretics (9.5% vs 27.7%, < .001) and spironolactone as a fourth-line agent (8.3% vs 15.9%, .054) increased with time but nonetheless remained infrequent. Results were similar in the sensitivity analysis.
Specific indication of the prescribed antihypertensive medications and follow-up BP data was not available.
Application of hypertension guidelines for the choice of antihypertensive drugs remains suboptimal, highlighting the need for education initiatives. This may be an important step to raise BP control rates in Canada.
尽管血压控制对于预防心血管疾病至关重要,但加拿大的高血压控制率却在下降。
为评估此问题,我们试图评估2009年至2021年魁北克省抗高血压药物处方概况的差异。
这是一项回顾性队列研究。
我们使用了与行政健康数据库相关联的基于CARTaGENE人群的队列数据。
纳入在随访结束前6个月内有任何药物报销记录的参与者。
在入组时(2009 - 2010年)和随访结束时(2021年3月)评估指南推荐的抗高血压药物处方概况。
使用Pearson卡方检验比较两个时间段的处方做法。通过排除那些抗高血压药物可能并非仅用于治疗高血压的参与者(随访前或随访期间有记录的心房颤动/扑动、缺血性心脏病、心力衰竭、慢性肾病或偏头痛)进行敏感性分析。
在纳入研究的8447名参与者中,31.4%和51.3%在随访开始和结束时开具了抗高血压药物处方。在两个研究时间段内,大多数高血压参与者都采用了指南推荐的单药治疗(分别为77.9%和79.5%,P =.3),而最佳的两药和三药联合使用频率较低(分别为62.0%和61.4%,P =.77,51.9%和46.7%,P =.066)。只有长效噻嗪类利尿剂的使用(9.5%对27.7%,P <.001)和螺内酯作为四线药物的使用(8.3%对15.9%,P =.054)随时间增加,但仍然不常见。敏感性分析结果相似。
无法获得所开具抗高血压药物的具体适应症和随访血压数据。
在选择抗高血压药物方面,高血压指南的应用仍未达到最佳状态,这凸显了开展教育举措的必要性。这可能是提高加拿大血压控制率的重要一步。