• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测五国高血压患者使用单片复方制剂治疗的长期益处。

Projecting the long-term benefits of single pill combination therapy for patients with hypertension in five countries.

作者信息

Borghi Claudio, Wang Jiguang, Rodionov Anton V, Rosas Martin, Sohn Il Suk, Alcocer Luis, Valentine William J, Deroche-Chibedi Daniela, Granados Denis, Croce Davide

机构信息

University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2021 Aug 8;10:200102. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2021.200102. eCollection 2021 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcrp.2021.200102
PMID:35112114
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8790100/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To project the 10-year clinical outcomes associated with single pill combination (SPC) therapies compared with multi-pill regimens for the management of hypertension in five countries (Italy, Russia, China, South Korea and Mexico).

METHODS

A microsimulation model was designed to project health outcomes between 2020 and 2030 for populations with hypertension managed according to four different treatment pathways: current treatment practices (CTP), single drug with dosage titration then sequential addition of other agents (start low and go slow, SLGS), free choice combination with multiple pills (FCC) and combination therapy in the form of a single pill (SPC). Model inputs were derived from the Global Burden of Disease 2017 dataset. Simulated outcomes of mortality, chronic kidney disease (CKD), stroke, ischemic heart disease (IHD), and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were estimated for 1,000,000 patients on each treatment pathway.

RESULTS

SPC therapy was projected to improve clinical outcomes over SLGS, FCC and CTP in all countries. SPC reduced mortality by 5.4% in Italy, 4.9% in Russia, 4.5% in China, 2.3% in South Korea and 3.6% in Mexico versus CTP and showed greater reductions in mortality than SLGS and FCC. The projected incidence of clinical events was reduced by 11.5% in Italy, 9.2% in Russia, 8.4% in China, 4.9% in South Korea and 6.7% in Mexico for SPC versus CTP.

CONCLUSIONS

Ten-year projections indicated that combination therapies (FCC and SPC) are likely to reduce the burden of hypertension compared with conventional management approaches, with SPC showing the greatest overall benefits due to improved adherence.

摘要

目的

预测在五个国家(意大利、俄罗斯、中国、韩国和墨西哥)使用单片复方制剂(SPC)疗法与多片联合方案治疗高血压的10年临床结局。

方法

设计了一个微观模拟模型,以预测2020年至2030年期间,按照四种不同治疗途径管理的高血压人群的健康结局:当前治疗实践(CTP)、先单药滴定剂量然后依次加用其他药物(起始剂量低、逐步加量,SLGS)、自由选择多片联合用药(FCC)以及单片复方制剂形式的联合治疗(SPC)。模型输入数据源自《2017年全球疾病负担》数据集。对每种治疗途径下的100万名患者估计了死亡率、慢性肾脏病(CKD)、中风、缺血性心脏病(IHD)以及伤残调整生命年(DALY)的模拟结局。

结果

预计SPC疗法在所有国家均能比SLGS、FCC和CTP改善临床结局。与CTP相比,SPC在意大利使死亡率降低5.4%,在俄罗斯降低4.9%,在中国降低4.5%,在韩国降低2.3%,在墨西哥降低3.6%,并且在降低死亡率方面比SLGS和FCC表现更优。与CTP相比,SPC在意大利使临床事件预计发生率降低11.5%,在俄罗斯降低9.2%,在中国降低8.4%,在韩国降低4.9%,在墨西哥降低6.7%。

结论

10年预测表明,与传统管理方法相比,联合治疗(FCC和SPC)可能减轻高血压负担,由于依从性提高,SPC显示出最大的总体益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c4/8790100/fcce3e50fc6d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c4/8790100/33d8bac3b4a9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c4/8790100/9886c1e7444e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c4/8790100/fcce3e50fc6d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c4/8790100/33d8bac3b4a9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c4/8790100/9886c1e7444e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c4/8790100/fcce3e50fc6d/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Projecting the long-term benefits of single pill combination therapy for patients with hypertension in five countries.预测五国高血压患者使用单片复方制剂治疗的长期益处。
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2021 Aug 8;10:200102. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2021.200102. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
Estimating the impact of single pill combination therapy for hypertension: projections of patient outcomes in Italy.评估单片复方制剂治疗高血压的影响:对意大利患者结局的预测。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2023 Oct 1;24(10):714-720. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001494. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
3
Cost-effectiveness of single-pill and separate-pill administration of antihypertensive triple combination therapy: a population-based microsimulation study.基于人群的微观模拟研究:降压三联复方单片与分药治疗的成本效果比较。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 6;24(1):1808. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19346-4.
4
Single Pill Regimen Leads to Better Adherence and Clinical Outcome in Daily Practice in Patients Suffering from Hypertension and/or Dyslipidemia: Results of a Meta-Analysis.单片复方制剂在高血压和/或血脂异常患者的日常实践中可带来更好的依从性和临床结局:一项荟萃分析的结果
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2020 Apr;27(2):157-164. doi: 10.1007/s40292-020-00370-5. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
5
A Retrospective Observational Real-Word Analysis of the Adherence, Healthcare Resource Consumption and Costs in Patients Treated with Bisoprolol/Perindopril as Single-Pill or Free Combination.一项回顾性观察性真实世界分析:比较比索洛尔/培哚普利单药治疗与自由联合治疗患者的依从性、医疗资源消耗和成本。
Adv Ther. 2024 Jan;41(1):182-197. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02707-7. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
6
Adherence and related cardiovascular outcomes to single pill vs. separate pill administration of antihypertensive triple-combination therapy.单片与分开服用降压三联复方制剂的依从性及相关心血管结局。
J Hypertens. 2023 Sep 1;41(9):1466-1473. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003497. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
7
The Effects of Single Pill Combinations on Adherence and Blood Pressure Control in Hypertensive Patients.单片复方制剂对高血压患者依从性和血压控制的影响
Mater Sociomed. 2022 Jun;34(2):130-135. doi: 10.5455/msm.2022.34.130-135.
8
Adherence to triple-component antihypertensive regimens is higher with single-pill than equivalent two-pill regimens: A randomized controlled trial.与等效的两片固定复方制剂相比,单片复方制剂的三联抗高血压治疗方案的依从性更高:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Transl Sci. 2021 May;14(3):1185-1192. doi: 10.1111/cts.12979. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
9
Impact of single-pill combinations versus free-equivalent combinations on adherence and persistence in patients with hypertension and dyslipidemia: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.单片复方制剂与自由等效复方制剂对高血压和血脂异常患者依从性和持久性的影响:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Sep;24(7):817-827. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2293199. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
10
Comparison of real-world adherence, healthcare resource utilization and costs for newly initiated valsartan/amlodipine single-pill combination versus angiotensin receptor blocker/calcium channel blocker free-combination therapy.比较新起始缬沙坦/氨氯地平单片复方与血管紧张素受体阻滞剂/钙通道阻滞剂自由联合治疗的真实世界依从性、医疗资源利用和成本。
J Med Econ. 2011;14(5):576-83. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.596873. Epub 2011 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Providers' Behaviors, Attitudes, and Preferences on the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension With Endothelin Receptor Antagonist (ERA) + Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors (PDE5i).探索医疗服务提供者在使用内皮素受体拮抗剂(ERA)联合磷酸二酯酶-5抑制剂(PDE5i)治疗肺动脉高压方面的行为、态度和偏好。
Pulm Circ. 2025 Jun 22;15(2):e70113. doi: 10.1002/pul2.70113. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
The relationship between frailty syndrome and quality of life in patients with hypertension: a multidimensional analysis.高血压患者衰弱综合征与生活质量的关系:多维分析
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jan 9;25(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05669-9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Hypertension Awareness, Treatment, and Control in US Adults: Trends in the Hypertension Control Cascade by Population Subgroup (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2016).美国成年人的高血压知晓率、治疗率和控制率:按人口亚组分析高血压控制级联的趋势(1999-2016 年国家健康和营养调查)。
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Dec 31;188(12):2165-2174. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz177.
2
Population and fertility by age and sex for 195 countries and territories, 1950-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.1950-2017 年 195 个国家和地区按年龄和性别划分的人口和生育率:2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1995-2051. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32278-5. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
3
Efficacy of Olmesartan/Amlodipine Single-Pill Combination on 24-h Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Monitoring in Non-Responders to Valsartan or Candesartan Monotherapy.
奥美沙坦/氨氯地平单片复方制剂对缬沙坦或坎地沙坦单药治疗无反应者动态监测的24小时平均收缩压的疗效。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2025 Jan;27(1):e14929. doi: 10.1111/jch.14929. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
4
Comparing scale up of status quo hypertension care against dual combination therapy as separate pills or single pill combinations: an economic evaluation in 24 low- and middle-income countries.比较现状高血压护理与作为分开药丸或单片复方制剂的双重联合疗法的扩大规模情况:24个低收入和中等收入国家的经济评估。
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Aug 27;75:102778. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102778. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
Effect of a single pill concept on clinical and pharmacoeconomic outcomes in cardiovascular diseases.单片复方制剂概念对心血管疾病临床及药物经济学结局的影响。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2025 Jan 11;10(8):686-693. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae059.
6
Differences in Antihypertensive Medication Prescription Profiles Between 2009 and 2021: A Retrospective Cohort Study of CARTaGENE.2009年至2021年抗高血压药物处方概况的差异:CARTaGENE的一项回顾性队列研究
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2024 Apr 9;11:20543581241234729. doi: 10.1177/20543581241234729. eCollection 2024.
7
A real-world analysis of outcomes and healthcare costs of patients on perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine single-pill vs. multiple-pill combination in Italy.在意大利,对培哚普利/吲达帕胺/氨氯地平单片与多片联合治疗的患者的实际结局和医疗成本进行的分析。
J Hypertens. 2024 Jan 1;42(1):136-142. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003570. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
8
Estimating the impact of single pill combination therapy for hypertension: projections of patient outcomes in Italy.评估单片复方制剂治疗高血压的影响:对意大利患者结局的预测。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2023 Oct 1;24(10):714-720. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001494. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.
全球、区域和国家 84 种行为、环境、职业和代谢风险以及 195 个国家和地区 1990 至 2017 年风险簇的比较风险评估:全球疾病负担研究 2017 系统分析。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1923-1994. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32225-6. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
4
Initial Antihypertensive Treatment Strategies and Therapeutic Inertia.初始抗高血压治疗策略和治疗惰性。
Hypertension. 2018 Oct;72(4):846-853. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11308.
5
Combination therapy in the treatment of hypertension.高血压治疗中的联合疗法。
Drugs Context. 2018 Jun 6;7:212531. doi: 10.7573/dic.212531. eCollection 2018.
6
Polypill, hypertension and medication adherence: The solution strategy?复方药丸、高血压和药物依从性:解决方案策略?
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Feb 1;252:181-186. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.11.075. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
7
Cost-effectiveness Analyses of Antihypertensive Medicines: A Systematic Review.抗高血压药物的成本效益分析:系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Dec;53(6S2):S131-S142. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.06.020.
8
'Drugs don't work in patients who don't take them' (C. Everett Koop, MD, US Surgeon General, 1985).“药物对不服药的患者不起作用”(美国卫生局局长C. 埃弗雷特·库普医学博士,1985年)。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Nov;19(11):1412-1413. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.920. Epub 2017 Sep 10.
9
Practical Applications for Single Pill Combinations in the Cardiovascular Continuum.单片复方制剂在心血管疾病全程管理中的实际应用
Card Fail Rev. 2017 Apr;3(1):40-45. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2017:5:1.
10
Association between medication regimen complexity and pharmacotherapy adherence: a systematic review.药物治疗方案复杂性与药物治疗依从性之间的关联:一项系统综述
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Nov;73(11):1475-1489. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2315-2. Epub 2017 Aug 4.