Suppr超能文献

基于格拉姆角差场和改进双注意力残差网络的滚动轴承智能故障诊断

Intelligent Fault Diagnosis of Rolling Bearing Based on Gramian Angular Difference Field and Improved Dual Attention Residual Network.

作者信息

Tong Anshi, Zhang Jun, Xie Liyang

机构信息

School of Mechanical Engineering, Shenyang University, Shenyang 110044, China.

School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2024 Mar 27;24(7):2156. doi: 10.3390/s24072156.

Abstract

With the rapid development of smart manufacturing, data-driven deep learning (DL) methods are widely used for bearing fault diagnosis. Aiming at the problem of model training crashes when data are imbalanced and the difficulty of traditional signal analysis methods in effectively extracting fault features, this paper proposes an intelligent fault diagnosis method of rolling bearings based on Gramian Angular Difference Field (GADF) and Improved Dual Attention Residual Network (IDARN). The original vibration signals are encoded as 2D-GADF feature images for network input; the residual structures will incorporate dual attention mechanism to enhance the integration ability of the features, while the group normalization (GN) method is introduced to overcome the bias caused by data discrepancies; and then the model is trained to complete the classification of faults. In order to verify the superiority of the proposed method, the data obtained from Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) bearing data and bearing fault experimental equipment were compared with other popular DL methods, and the proposed model performed optimally. The method eventually achieved an average identification accuracy of 99.2% and 97.9% on two different types of datasets, respectively.

摘要

随着智能制造的快速发展,数据驱动的深度学习(DL)方法被广泛用于轴承故障诊断。针对数据不均衡时模型训练崩溃的问题以及传统信号分析方法难以有效提取故障特征的难题,本文提出了一种基于格拉姆角差分场(GADF)和改进型双注意力残差网络(IDARN)的滚动轴承智能故障诊断方法。原始振动信号被编码为二维格拉姆角差分场特征图像作为网络输入;残差结构将融入双注意力机制以增强特征的融合能力,同时引入组归一化(GN)方法来克服数据差异导致的偏差;然后对模型进行训练以完成故障分类。为验证所提方法的优越性,将从美国凯斯西储大学(CWRU)轴承数据和轴承故障实验设备获取的数据与其他流行的深度学习方法进行比较,所提模型表现最优。该方法最终在两种不同类型的数据集上分别实现了99.2%和97.9%的平均识别准确率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73be/11014029/717a48afa950/sensors-24-02156-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验