Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Department of Surgery, H. S. U. Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Apr 13;28(1):46. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02920-8.
Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) is considered to be the gold standard for managing rectal prolapse. Nevertheless, concerns have been expressed about the use of this procedure in elderly patients. The aim of the current study was to examine the perioperative safety of primary LVMR operations in the oldest old in comparison to younger individuals and to assess our hospital policy of offering LVMR to all patients, regardless of age and morbidity.
A retrospective study analysed demographic information, operation notes, meshes utilised, operation times, lengths of hospital stay (LOS) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores of patients who underwent LVMR at Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital between 2012 and 2023.
Eighty-seven female patients underwent LVMR. Nineteen patients were 80 years of age or older (OLD group); the remaining 65 patients were under the age of 80 (YOUNG group). The difference between the groups in terms of age was statistically significant. ASA scores were not significantly different. No mortality was observed. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of LOS, operation time or morbidity. Moreover, the postoperative morbidity profile was excellent in both groups.
LVMR seems to be a safe operation for the "oldest old" patients with comorbidity, despite a single-centre, retrospective trial with limited follow-up. The present study suggests abandoning the dogma that "frail patients with rectal prolapse are not suitable for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy."
腹腔镜下腹膜前直肠固定术(LVMR)被认为是治疗直肠脱垂的金标准。然而,人们对该手术在老年患者中的应用表示担忧。本研究旨在比较高龄患者与年轻患者初次 LVMR 手术的围手术期安全性,并评估我们医院对所有患者(无论年龄和合并症情况如何)均提供 LVMR 的治疗政策。
回顾性研究分析了 2012 年至 2023 年期间在 Elisabeth-TweeSteden 医院接受 LVMR 的患者的人口统计学信息、手术记录、使用的网片、手术时间、住院时间(LOS)和美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分。
87 名女性患者接受了 LVMR。19 名患者年龄在 80 岁或以上(OLD 组);其余 65 名患者年龄在 80 岁以下(YOUNG 组)。两组间的年龄差异具有统计学意义。ASA 评分无显著差异。无死亡病例。两组间 LOS、手术时间或发病率无统计学差异。此外,两组患者的术后发病率均较好。
尽管是一项单中心、回顾性研究,随访时间有限,但 LVMR 对于合并症的“最年长”患者似乎是一种安全的手术。本研究表明,放弃“患有直肠脱垂的虚弱患者不适合接受腹腔镜下腹膜前直肠固定术”的观点是合理的。