Wang F M, Tsai L C, Chang Z N, Han S H, Tsao D
Proc Natl Sci Counc Repub China B. 1985 Apr;9(2):119-25.
The concentration of serum CA19-9TM in 101 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC), and 109 patients with carcinomas of lung, breast, stomach and pancreas and hepatoma, and 40 normal healthy controls including an equal number of smokers and nonsmokers were determined by solid phase radioimmunoassay of CA19-9 assay kits (Centocor). Of the normal sera, only 1 out of 40 (2.5%) was over 37.6 U/ml. No significant difference of CA19-9 levels was found between smokers (14.4 +/- 9.0 U/ml) and non-smokers (16.0 +/- 10.2 U/ml) of normal control. In patients sera, the mean value of CA19-9 levels was significantly higher in patients with Dukes B (P less than 0.05) and in patients with Dukes C and D (P less than 0.001) than the normal healthy control (15.2 +/- 10.2 U/ml). Analysis of serum CEA concentrations has shown a similar result in patients with all Dukes staged CRC. The CA19-9 levels was also significantly elevated in patients with gastric carcinoma, lung carcinoma, hepatoma, and especially in patients with pancreatic carcinoma (P less than 0.0001). The levels of CA19-9 elevated in 50% (22/44) of patients with advanced CRC while the elevation was 8 of 43 (18.6%) patients with localized CRC. A comparison of CA19-9 and CEA assays showed no correlation (r = 0.125) between the two assays. Although the CA19-9 assay (26.4%) was less sensitive than the CEA assay (51.7%), the specificity of CA19-9 assay (97.5%) was better than that of CEA assay (87.5%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
采用CA19-9检测试剂盒(Centocor公司)的固相放射免疫分析法,测定了101例结肠腺癌(CRC)患者、109例肺癌、乳腺癌、胃癌、胰腺癌及肝癌患者以及40名正常健康对照者(吸烟者和非吸烟者各20名)血清CA19-9TM的浓度。在正常血清中,40例仅有1例(2.5%)超过37.6 U/ml。正常对照的吸烟者(14.4±9.0 U/ml)和非吸烟者(16.0±10.2 U/ml)之间CA19-9水平无显著差异。在患者血清中,Dukes B期患者(P<0.05)以及Dukes C期和D期患者(P<0.001)的CA19-9水平平均值显著高于正常健康对照者(15.2±10.2 U/ml)。对所有Dukes分期的CRC患者血清CEA浓度的分析显示了类似结果。胃癌、肺癌、肝癌患者的CA19-9水平也显著升高,尤其是胰腺癌患者(P<0.0001)。晚期CRC患者中50%(22/44)的CA19-9水平升高,而局限性CRC患者中43例有8例(18.6%)升高。CA19-9和CEA检测的比较显示两种检测方法之间无相关性(r=0.125)。尽管CA19-9检测(26.4%)的敏感性低于CEA检测(51.7%),但CA19-9检测的特异性(97.5%)优于CEA检测(87.5%)。(摘要截选至250字)