• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别英国采用数字接触者追踪应用程序的障碍:对参与疫情应对的专业人员进行的半结构化访谈研究

Identifying Barriers to the Adoption of Digital Contact Tracing Apps in England: Semistructured Interview Study With Professionals Involved in the Pandemic Response.

作者信息

Palmer Anna, Sharma Shaishab, Nagpal Jayesh, Kimani Victor, Mai Florence, Ahmed Zara

机构信息

Imperial College School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2024 Aug 12;8:e56000. doi: 10.2196/56000.

DOI:10.2196/56000
PMID:39133910
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11347901/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The NHS (National Health Service) COVID-19 app was a digital contact tracing app (DCTA) used in England in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of which was to limit the spread of COVID-19 by providing exposure alerts. At the time of the pandemic, questions were raised regarding the effectiveness and cost of the NHS COVID-19 app and whether DCTAs have a role in future pandemics.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore key barriers to DCTAs in England during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

This is a qualitative study using semistructured video interviews conducted with professionals in public health, digital health, clinicians, health care law, and health executives who had an active role in the COVID-19 pandemic. These interviews aimed to explore the perspective of different experts involved in the pandemic response and gauge their opinions on the key barriers to DCTAs in England during the COVID-19 pandemic. The initial use of maximum variation sampling combined with a snowball sampling approach ensured diversity within the cohort of interviewees. Interview transcripts were then analyzed using Braun and Clarke's 6 steps for thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Key themes that acted as barriers to DCTAs were revealed by interviewees such as privacy concerns, poor communication, technological accessibility, digital literacy, and incorrect use of the NHS COVID-19 app. Interviewees believed that some of these issues stemmed from poor governmental communication and a lack of transparency regarding how the NHS COVID-19 app worked, resulting in decreased public trust. Moreover, interviewees highlighted that a lack of social support integration within the NHS COVID-19 app and delayed app notification period also contributed to the poor adoption rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Qualitative findings from interviews highlighted barriers to the NHS COVID-19 app, which can be applied to DCTAs more widely and highlight some important implications for the future use of DCTAS. There was no consensus among interviewees as to whether the NHS COVID-19 app was a success; however, all interviewees provided recommendations for improvements in creating and implementing DCTAs in the future.

摘要

背景

英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)新冠应用程序是一款数字接触者追踪应用程序(DCTA),在英国用于应对新冠疫情。其目的是通过提供接触警报来限制新冠病毒的传播。在疫情期间,人们对NHS新冠应用程序的有效性和成本以及DCTA在未来疫情中是否发挥作用提出了疑问。

目的

本研究旨在探讨新冠疫情期间英国DCTA的关键障碍。

方法

这是一项定性研究,采用半结构化视频访谈,访谈对象为在新冠疫情中发挥积极作用的公共卫生、数字健康、临床医生、医疗保健法律和卫生管理人员等专业人士。这些访谈旨在探讨参与疫情应对的不同专家的观点,并评估他们对新冠疫情期间英国DCTA关键障碍的看法。最初采用最大变异抽样结合滚雪球抽样方法,确保了受访者群体的多样性。然后使用布劳恩和克拉克的6步主题分析法对访谈记录进行分析。

结果

受访者揭示了一些成为DCTA障碍的关键主题,如隐私担忧、沟通不畅、技术可及性、数字素养以及NHS新冠应用程序的使用不当。受访者认为,其中一些问题源于政府沟通不畅以及NHS新冠应用程序的工作方式缺乏透明度,导致公众信任度下降。此外,受访者强调,NHS新冠应用程序缺乏社会支持整合以及应用程序通知期延迟也导致了采用率较低。

结论

访谈的定性结果突出了NHS新冠应用程序的障碍,这些障碍可更广泛地应用于DCTA,并对DCTA的未来使用具有一些重要启示。受访者对于NHS新冠应用程序是否成功没有达成共识;然而,所有受访者都为未来创建和实施DCTA提出了改进建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c95d/11347901/36e6c526eda0/formative_v8i1e56000_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c95d/11347901/36e6c526eda0/formative_v8i1e56000_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c95d/11347901/36e6c526eda0/formative_v8i1e56000_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying Barriers to the Adoption of Digital Contact Tracing Apps in England: Semistructured Interview Study With Professionals Involved in the Pandemic Response.识别英国采用数字接触者追踪应用程序的障碍:对参与疫情应对的专业人员进行的半结构化访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Aug 12;8:e56000. doi: 10.2196/56000.
2
Understanding Trust and Changes in Use After a Year With the NHS COVID-19 Contact Tracing App in the United Kingdom: Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study.理解信任和在英国使用 NHS COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序一年后的变化:纵向混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 14;24(10):e40558. doi: 10.2196/40558.
3
Cultural Implications Regarding Privacy in Digital Contact Tracing Algorithms: Method Development and Empirical Ethics Analysis of a German and a Japanese Approach to Contact Tracing.文化视角下数字接触追踪算法中的隐私问题:德国和日本接触追踪方法的发展与实证伦理分析
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 28;25:e45112. doi: 10.2196/45112.
4
Public Adoption of and Trust in the NHS COVID-19 Contact Tracing App in the United Kingdom: Quantitative Online Survey Study.英国国民保健制度 (NHS) COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的公众采用和信任:定量在线调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 17;23(9):e29085. doi: 10.2196/29085.
5
State of the Art in Adoption of Contact Tracing Apps and Recommendations Regarding Privacy Protection and Public Health: Systematic Review.接触者追踪应用程序的应用现状以及关于隐私保护和公共卫生的建议:系统评价
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 10;9(6):e23250. doi: 10.2196/23250.
6
The Impact of Digital Contact Tracing Apps Overuse on Prevention of COVID-19: A Normative Activation Model Perspective.数字接触追踪应用过度使用对COVID-19预防的影响:规范激活模型视角
Life (Basel). 2022 Sep 2;12(9):1371. doi: 10.3390/life12091371.
7
Factors Influencing the Adoption of Contact Tracing Applications: Systematic Review and Recommendations.影响接触者追踪应用程序采用的因素:系统评价与建议
Front Digit Health. 2022 May 3;4:862466. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.862466. eCollection 2022.
8
Performance of the Swiss Digital Contact-Tracing App Over Various SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Waves: Repeated Cross-sectional Analyses.瑞士数字化接触者追踪应用在不同 SARS-CoV-2 大流行波次中的表现:重复横断面分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Nov 11;8(11):e41004. doi: 10.2196/41004.
9
Post-COVID Public Health Surveillance and Privacy Expectations in the United States: Scenario-Based Interview Study.美国新冠疫情后公共卫生监测与隐私预期:基于情景的访谈研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Oct 5;9(10):e30871. doi: 10.2196/30871.
10
Learnings from the design and acceptance of the German COVID-19 tracing app for IS-driven crisis management: a design science research.从德国 COVID-19 追踪应用程序的设计和接受中获得的经验教训:一项面向 IS 驱动的危机管理的设计科学研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Aug 9;21(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01579-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiological impacts of the NHS COVID-19 app in England and Wales throughout its first year.英格兰和威尔士全民保健制度 COVID-19 应用程序在其第一年的流行病学影响。
Nat Commun. 2023 Feb 22;14(1):858. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36495-z.
2
The UK COVID-19 contact tracing app as both an emerging technology and public health intervention: The need to consider promissory discourses.英国 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序既是一种新兴技术,也是一种公共卫生干预措施:有必要考虑承诺话语。
Health (London). 2023 Jul;27(4):625-644. doi: 10.1177/13634593211060768. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
3
Contact tracing is an imperfect tool for controlling COVID-19 transmission and relies on population adherence.
接触者追踪是控制 COVID-19 传播的一种不完善的工具,依赖于人群的依从性。
Nat Commun. 2021 Sep 13;12(1):5412. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25531-5.
4
Intensity and frequency of extreme novel epidemics.极端新型传染病的强度和频率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 31;118(35). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2105482118.
5
Public Adoption of and Trust in the NHS COVID-19 Contact Tracing App in the United Kingdom: Quantitative Online Survey Study.英国国民保健制度 (NHS) COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的公众采用和信任:定量在线调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 17;23(9):e29085. doi: 10.2196/29085.
6
Analysis of the factors affecting the adoption and compliance of the NHS COVID-19 mobile application: a national cross-sectional survey in England.分析影响国民保健制度 COVID-19 移动应用程序采用和遵守情况的因素:英格兰全国横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 13;11(8):e053395. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053395.
7
The epidemiological impact of the NHS COVID-19 app.NHS COVID-19 应用程序的流行病学影响。
Nature. 2021 Jun;594(7863):408-412. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03606-z. Epub 2021 May 12.
8
Adoption of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: A Balance Between Privacy and Effectiveness.采用 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序:在隐私和效果之间取得平衡。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 4;23(3):e25726. doi: 10.2196/25726.
9
Public attitudes towards COVID-19 contact tracing apps: A UK-based focus group study.公众对 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的态度:基于英国的焦点小组研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):377-385. doi: 10.1111/hex.13179. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
10
Without a trace: Why did corona apps fail?毫无踪迹:新冠应用程序为何失败?
J Med Ethics. 2021 Jan 8;47(12):e83. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107061.