Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Seaman Family MR Research Centre, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Magn Reson Med. 2024 Oct;92(4):1404-1420. doi: 10.1002/mrm.30130. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
To investigate whether parallel imaging-imposed geometric coil constraints can be relaxed when using a deep learning (DL)-based image reconstruction method as opposed to a traditional non-DL method.
Traditional and DL-based MR image reconstruction approaches operate in fundamentally different ways: Traditional methods solve a system of equations derived from the image data whereas DL methods use data/target pairs to learn a generalizable reconstruction model. Two sets of head coil profiles were evaluated: (1) 8-channel and (2) 32-channel geometries. A DL model was compared to conjugate gradient SENSE (CG-SENSE) and L1-wavelet compressed sensing (CS) through quantitative metrics and visual assessment as coil overlap was increased.
Results were generally consistent between experiments. As coil overlap increased, there was a significant (p < 0.001) decrease in performance in most cases for all methods. The decrease was most pronounced for CG-SENSE, and the DL models significantly outperformed (p < 0.001) their non-DL counterparts in all scenarios. CS showed improved robustness to coil overlap and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) versus CG-SENSE, but had quantitatively and visually poorer reconstructions characterized by blurriness as compared to DL. DL showed virtually no change in performance across SNR and very small changes across coil overlap.
The DL image reconstruction method produced images that were robust to coil overlap and of higher quality than CG-SENSE and CS. This suggests that geometric coil design constraints can be relaxed when using DL reconstruction methods.
研究在使用基于深度学习(DL)的图像重建方法而不是传统的非 DL 方法时,是否可以放宽并行成像施加的几何线圈约束。
传统和基于 DL 的磁共振图像重建方法的工作方式有根本的不同:传统方法从图像数据中求解方程组,而 DL 方法则使用数据/目标对来学习可推广的重建模型。评估了两组头线圈轮廓:(1)8 通道和(2)32 通道几何形状。通过定量指标和视觉评估,将 DL 模型与共轭梯度 SENSE(CG-SENSE)和 L1 小波压缩感知(CS)进行比较,随着线圈重叠的增加。
实验结果基本一致。随着线圈重叠的增加,在大多数情况下,所有方法的性能都有显著下降(p <0.001)。CG-SENSE 的下降最为明显,DL 模型在所有情况下都明显优于(p <0.001)其非 DL 对应物。CS 与 CG-SENSE 相比,对线圈重叠和信噪比(SNR)具有更好的鲁棒性,但与 DL 相比,其重建质量较差,具有模糊性。DL 在 SNR 上的性能几乎没有变化,在线圈重叠上的变化很小。
DL 图像重建方法生成的图像对线圈重叠具有鲁棒性,并且质量优于 CG-SENSE 和 CS。这表明,当使用 DL 重建方法时,可以放宽几何线圈设计约束。