• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于电子健康记录数据的机器学习算法预测术后并发症的性能及移动平台报告。

Performance of a Machine Learning Algorithm Using Electronic Health Record Data to Predict Postoperative Complications and Report on a Mobile Platform.

机构信息

Intelligent Critical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville.

Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Renal Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2211973. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.11973.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.11973
PMID:35576007
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9112066/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Predicting postoperative complications has the potential to inform shared decisions regarding the appropriateness of surgical procedures, targeted risk-reduction strategies, and postoperative resource use. Realizing these advantages requires that accurate real-time predictions be integrated with clinical and digital workflows; artificial intelligence predictive analytic platforms using automated electronic health record (EHR) data inputs offer an intriguing possibility for achieving this, but there is a lack of high-level evidence from prospective studies supporting their use.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether the MySurgeryRisk artificial intelligence system has stable predictive performance between development and prospective validation phases and whether it is feasible to provide automated outputs directly to surgeons' mobile devices.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this prognostic study, the platform used automated EHR data inputs and machine learning algorithms to predict postoperative complications and provide predictions to surgeons, previously through a web portal and currently through a mobile device application. All patients 18 years or older who were admitted for any type of inpatient surgical procedure (74 417 total procedures involving 58 236 patients) between June 1, 2014, and September 20, 2020, were included. Models were developed using retrospective data from 52 117 inpatient surgical procedures performed between June 1, 2014, and November 27, 2018. Validation was performed using data from 22 300 inpatient surgical procedures collected prospectively from November 28, 2018, to September 20, 2020.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Algorithms for generalized additive models and random forest models were developed and validated using real-time EHR data. Model predictive performance was evaluated primarily using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values.

RESULTS

Among 58 236 total adult patients who received 74 417 major inpatient surgical procedures, the mean (SD) age was 57 (17) years; 29 226 patients (50.2%) were male. Results reported in this article focus primarily on the validation cohort. The validation cohort included 22 300 inpatient surgical procedures involving 19 132 patients (mean [SD] age, 58 [17] years; 9672 [50.6%] male). A total of 2765 patients (14.5%) were Black or African American, 14 777 (77.2%) were White, 1235 (6.5%) were of other races (including American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, and multiracial), and 355 (1.9%) were of unknown race because of missing data; 979 patients (5.1%) were Hispanic, 17 663 (92.3%) were non-Hispanic, and 490 (2.6%) were of unknown ethnicity because of missing data. A greater number of input features was associated with stable or improved model performance. For example, the random forest model trained with 135 input features had the highest AUROC values for predicting acute kidney injury (0.82; 95% CI, 0.82-0.83); cardiovascular complications (0.81; 95% CI, 0.81-0.82); neurological complications, including delirium (0.87; 95% CI, 0.87-0.88); prolonged intensive care unit stay (0.89; 95% CI, 0.88-0.89); prolonged mechanical ventilation (0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.91); sepsis (0.86; 95% CI, 0.85-0.87); venous thromboembolism (0.82; 95% CI, 0.81-0.83); wound complications (0.78; 95% CI, 0.78-0.79); 30-day mortality (0.84; 95% CI, 0.82-0.86); and 90-day mortality (0.84; 95% CI, 0.82-0.85), with accuracy similar to surgeons' predictions. Compared with the original web portal, the mobile device application allowed efficient fingerprint login access and loaded data approximately 10 times faster. The application output displayed patient information, risk of postoperative complications, top 3 risk factors for each complication, and patterns of complications for individual surgeons compared with their colleagues.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, automated real-time predictions of postoperative complications with mobile device outputs had good performance in clinical settings with prospective validation, matching surgeons' predictive accuracy.

摘要

重要性:预测术后并发症有可能为手术程序的适当性、有针对性的降低风险策略以及术后资源使用提供信息共享决策。要实现这些优势,需要将准确的实时预测与临床和数字工作流程相结合;使用自动化电子健康记录(EHR)数据输入的人工智能预测分析平台为此提供了一种有趣的可能性,但缺乏来自前瞻性研究的高级别的证据支持其使用。

目的:研究 MySurgeryRisk 人工智能系统在开发和前瞻性验证阶段的预测性能是否稳定,以及是否可以直接将自动化输出提供给外科医生的移动设备。

设计、地点和参与者:在这项预测研究中,该平台使用自动化 EHR 数据输入和机器学习算法来预测术后并发症,并向外科医生提供预测,以前是通过网络门户,现在是通过移动设备应用程序。纳入 2014 年 6 月 1 日至 2020 年 9 月 20 日期间接受任何类型的住院手术(总共 74417 例手术,涉及 58236 名患者)的 18 岁及以上的所有患者。模型使用 2014 年 6 月 1 日至 2018 年 11 月 27 日期间进行的 52117 例住院手术的回顾性数据进行开发。2018 年 11 月 28 日至 2020 年 9 月 20 日期间收集的 22300 例住院手术前瞻性数据进行验证。

主要结果和措施:使用实时 EHR 数据开发和验证了广义加性模型和随机森林模型的算法。主要使用接收者操作特征曲线(AUROC)值评估模型预测性能。

结果:在总共接受 74417 例主要住院手术的 58236 名成年患者中,平均(SD)年龄为 57(17)岁;29226 名患者(50.2%)为男性。本文主要关注验证队列。验证队列包括 22300 例住院手术,涉及 19132 名患者(平均[SD]年龄为 58[17]岁;506%为男性)。2765 名患者(14.5%)为黑人或非裔美国人,14777 名(77.2%)为白人,1235 名(6.5%)为其他种族(包括美国印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民、亚洲人、夏威夷原住民或太平洋岛民和多种族),355 名(1.9%)因数据缺失而无法确定种族;979 名患者(5.1%)为西班牙裔,17663 名(92.3%)为非西班牙裔,490 名(2.6%)因数据缺失而无法确定种族。更多的输入特征与稳定或改善的模型性能相关。例如,用 135 个输入特征训练的随机森林模型在预测急性肾损伤(0.82;95%CI,0.82-0.83)、心血管并发症(0.81;95%CI,0.81-0.82)、包括谵妄在内的神经并发症(0.87;95%CI,0.87-0.88)、重症监护病房延长停留时间(0.89;95%CI,0.88-0.89)、机械通气延长时间(0.91;95%CI,0.90-0.91)、脓毒症(0.86;95%CI,0.85-0.87)、静脉血栓栓塞症(0.82;95%CI,0.81-0.83)、伤口并发症(0.78;95%CI,0.78-0.79)、30 天死亡率(0.84;95%CI,0.82-0.86)和 90 天死亡率(0.84;95%CI,0.82-0.85)方面的表现与外科医生的预测相当。与原始网络门户相比,移动设备应用程序允许通过指纹登录访问,并且加载数据的速度快约 10 倍。应用程序输出显示患者信息、术后并发症风险、每种并发症的前 3 个风险因素以及与同事相比单个外科医生的并发症模式。

结论:在这项前瞻性验证研究中,具有移动设备输出的自动化实时术后并发症预测在临床环境中具有良好的性能,与外科医生的预测准确性相匹配。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e35/9112066/6ed13f3c16a7/jamanetwopen-e2211973-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e35/9112066/6ed13f3c16a7/jamanetwopen-e2211973-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e35/9112066/6ed13f3c16a7/jamanetwopen-e2211973-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Performance of a Machine Learning Algorithm Using Electronic Health Record Data to Predict Postoperative Complications and Report on a Mobile Platform.基于电子健康记录数据的机器学习算法预测术后并发症的性能及移动平台报告。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2211973. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.11973.
2
Machine-learning Models Predict 30-Day Mortality, Cardiovascular Complications, and Respiratory Complications After Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty.机器学习模型预测无菌翻修全关节置换术后 30 天死亡率、心血管并发症和呼吸系统并发症。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Nov 1;480(11):2137-2145. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002276. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
3
Development and validation of machine learning models to identify high-risk surgical patients using automatically curated electronic health record data (Pythia): A retrospective, single-site study.使用自动整理的电子健康记录数据(Pythia)开发和验证机器学习模型以识别高风险手术患者:一项回顾性、单站点研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 27;15(11):e1002701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002701. eCollection 2018 Nov.
4
The Development and Validation of Simplified Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Prognosis of Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: Multicenter, Retrospective Study.中文译文:简化机器学习算法预测 COVID-19 住院患者预后的开发和验证:多中心回顾性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 21;24(1):e31549. doi: 10.2196/31549.
5
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Identify Patients Before Surgery at High Risk for Postoperative Adverse Events.开发和验证一种机器学习模型,以识别手术前术后不良事件风险较高的患者。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2322285. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.22285.
6
Use of Machine Learning to Develop and Evaluate Models Using Preoperative and Intraoperative Data to Identify Risks of Postoperative Complications.使用机器学习,结合术前和术中数据开发和评估模型,以识别术后并发症的风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e212240. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.2240.
7
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
8
Added Value of Intraoperative Data for Predicting Postoperative Complications: The MySurgeryRisk PostOp Extension.术中数据对预测术后并发症的附加价值:MySurgeryRisk术后扩展研究
J Surg Res. 2020 Oct;254:350-363. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
9
MySurgeryRisk: Development and Validation of a Machine-learning Risk Algorithm for Major Complications and Death After Surgery.MySurgeryRisk:一种用于手术主要并发症和死亡风险预测的机器学习算法的开发和验证。
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):652-662. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002706.
10
Optimizing predictive strategies for acute kidney injury after major vascular surgery.优化大血管手术后急性肾损伤的预测策略。
Surgery. 2021 Jul;170(1):298-303. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.01.030. Epub 2021 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Time-sequential prediction of postoperative complications after gastric cancer surgery using machine learning: a multicenter cohort study.使用机器学习对胃癌手术后的术后并发症进行时间序列预测:一项多中心队列研究。
Gastric Cancer. 2025 Sep 9. doi: 10.1007/s10120-025-01658-y.
2
Postoperative anterior knee pain in robot assisted total knee arthroplasty: a propensity score matching analysis.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术后膝前疼痛:倾向评分匹配分析
Surg Pract Sci. 2025 Aug 5;22:100301. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2025.100301. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3
Artificial intelligence and digital health in vascular surgery: a 2-decade bibliometric analysis of research landscapes and evolving frontiers.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Postoperative Undertriage to Hospital Wards With Mortality and Morbidity.术后分诊不当与医院病房死亡率和发病率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2131669. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.31669.
2
Extended vertical lists for temporal pattern mining from multivariate time series.用于从多变量时间序列中挖掘时间模式的扩展垂直列表
Expert Syst. 2019 Oct;36(5). doi: 10.1111/exsy.12448. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
3
Hidden in Plain Sight - Reconsidering the Use of Race Correction in Clinical Algorithms.隐匿于众目睽睽之下——重新审视临床算法中种族校正的应用
血管外科中的人工智能与数字健康:对研究格局和前沿进展的二十年文献计量分析
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 6;19(1):453. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02583-z.
4
Federated Learning for Predicting Major Postoperative Complications.用于预测主要术后并发症的联邦学习
Ann Surg Open. 2025 May 2;6(2):e573. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000573. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Postoperative sepsis-associated neurocognitive disorder: mechanisms, predictive strategies, and treatment approaches.术后脓毒症相关神经认知障碍:机制、预测策略及治疗方法。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 3;12:1513833. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1513833. eCollection 2025.
6
Predicting high-risk factors for postoperative inadequate analgesia and adverse reactions in cesarean delivery surgery: a prospective study.预测剖宫产手术术后镇痛不足及不良反应的高危因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Int J Surg. 2025 Jun 1;111(6):3859-3875. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002354. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
7
Predicting 30-Day Postoperative Mortality and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Using Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models: Development and Validation Study.使用检索增强大语言模型预测术后30天死亡率和美国麻醉医师协会身体状况:开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 3;27:e75052. doi: 10.2196/75052.
8
A Risk Prediction Model (CMC-AKIX) for Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury Using Machine Learning: Algorithm Development and Validation.一种使用机器学习的术后急性肾损伤风险预测模型(CMC-AKIX):算法开发与验证
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 9;27:e62853. doi: 10.2196/62853.
9
Predicting postoperative complications after pneumonectomy using machine learning: a 10-year study.使用机器学习预测肺切除术后并发症:一项为期10年的研究。
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2487636. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2487636. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
10
Development and validation of an ensemble learning risk model for sepsis after abdominal surgery.腹部手术后脓毒症的集成学习风险模型的开发与验证
Arch Med Sci. 2024 Jun 6;21(1):138-152. doi: 10.5114/aoms/189505. eCollection 2025.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 27;383(9):874-882. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms2004740. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
4
Improved predictive models for acute kidney injury with IDEA: Intraoperative Data Embedded Analytics.利用 IDEA(术中数据嵌入式分析)改进急性肾损伤的预测模型。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 4;14(4):e0214904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214904. eCollection 2019.
5
Comparing clinical judgment with the MySurgeryRisk algorithm for preoperative risk assessment: A pilot usability study.比较临床判断与 MySurgeryRisk 算法在术前风险评估中的应用:一项初步可用性研究。
Surgery. 2019 May;165(5):1035-1045. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
6
DeepSOFA: A Continuous Acuity Score for Critically Ill Patients using Clinically Interpretable Deep Learning.深度 SOFA:使用临床可解释深度学习的危重症患者连续敏锐度评分
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 12;9(1):1879. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38491-0.
7
ACS-NSQIP risk calculator predicts cohort but not individual risk of complication following colorectal resection.ACS-NSQIP 风险计算器预测队列但不能预测结直肠切除术后并发症的个体风险。
Am J Surg. 2019 Jul;218(1):131-135. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.11.017. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
8
Comparison of Gaussian Processes Methods to Linear methods for Imputation of Sparse Physiological Time Series.用于稀疏生理时间序列插补的高斯过程方法与线性方法的比较
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018 Jul;2018:4106-4109. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513303.
9
Use of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator During Preoperative Risk Discussion: The Patient Perspective.美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划手术风险计算器在术前风险讨论中的应用:患者视角。
Anesth Analg. 2019 Apr;128(4):643-650. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003718.
10
Eye of the beholder: Risk calculators and barriers to adoption in surgical trainees.旁观者之眼:手术受训者采用风险计算器的障碍。
Surgery. 2018 Nov;164(5):1117-1123. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Aug 24.