• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习集成的急性A型主动脉夹层全弓置换术后主要不良结局的术前预测

Preoperative prediction of major adverse outcomes after total arch replacement in acute type A aortic dissection based on machine learning ensemble.

作者信息

Luo Hanshen, Liu Xinyi, Yang Yuehang, Tang Bing, He Pan, Ding Li, Wang Zhiwen, Shi Jiawei

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1277 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430022, China.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20930. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06936-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-06936-4
PMID:40595056
Abstract

A machine learning model was developed and validated to predict postoperative complications in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) who underwent total arch replacement combined with frozen elephant trunk (TAR + FET), with the goal of improving postoperative survival quality and guiding clinical treatment. We retrospectively analyzed data from 635 ATAAD patients who underwent TAR + FET surgery at our institution between January 2018 and October 2023. Based on the International Aortic Arch Surgery Study Group definition of Major Adverse Outcomes (MAO), the entire dataset was divided into 160 patients with MAO and 475 patients without MAO. We utilized 66 variables to train 190 machine learning models. The SHAP method identified 11 strong predictors to create a simplified model. We evaluated the predictive performance and clinical utility of both models using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, precision-recall curves (PRC), calibration plots, and clinical decision curves. The combination of Random Survival Forest (RSF) and Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) was identified as the best predictive model. Both the full model and the simplified model achieved an area under the ROC curve above 0.85 and an area under the PRC curve above 0.703. The Brier values for the simplified model's calibration outcomes in the training and validation sets were 0.124 and 0.138, respectively, with a clinical utility risk threshold probability range of 0.2 to 0.9. A web-based simplified prediction model was developed (https://pmodel.shinyapps.io/pmodel/), enabling the prediction of complication risk in ATAAD patients undergoing TAR + FET surgery, thereby guiding clinical treatment decisions. The combination model of RSF and GBM effectively predicts the risk of postoperative complications in ATAAD patients, helping surgeons identify high-risk individuals and implement personalized perioperative management.

摘要

开发并验证了一种机器学习模型,用于预测接受全弓置换联合冰冻象鼻术(TAR+FET)的急性A型主动脉夹层(ATAAD)患者的术后并发症,旨在提高术后生存质量并指导临床治疗。我们回顾性分析了2018年1月至2023年10月期间在我院接受TAR+FET手术的635例ATAAD患者的数据。根据国际主动脉弓外科学研究组对主要不良结局(MAO)的定义,将整个数据集分为160例有MAO的患者和475例无MAO的患者。我们利用66个变量训练了190个机器学习模型。SHAP方法识别出11个强预测因子以创建一个简化模型。我们使用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线、精确召回率曲线(PRC)、校准图和临床决策曲线评估了这两种模型的预测性能和临床效用。随机生存森林(RSF)和梯度提升机(GBM)的组合被确定为最佳预测模型。完整模型和简化模型的ROC曲线下面积均高于0.85,PRC曲线下面积均高于0.703。简化模型在训练集和验证集中校准结果的Brier值分别为0.124和0.138,临床效用风险阈值概率范围为0.2至0.9。开发了一个基于网络的简化预测模型(https://pmodel.shinyapps.io/pmodel/),能够预测接受TAR+FET手术的ATAAD患者的并发症风险,从而指导临床治疗决策。RSF和GBM的组合模型有效地预测了ATAAD患者术后并发症的风险,帮助外科医生识别高危个体并实施个性化的围手术期管理。

相似文献

1
Preoperative prediction of major adverse outcomes after total arch replacement in acute type A aortic dissection based on machine learning ensemble.基于机器学习集成的急性A型主动脉夹层全弓置换术后主要不良结局的术前预测
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20930. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06936-4.
2
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
3
Supervised Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury in Patients With Sepsis: Development and Validation Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症相关肝损伤的监督式机器学习模型:基于多中心队列研究的开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e66733. doi: 10.2196/66733.
4
Development and validation of a predictive model for postoperative hepatic dysfunction in Stanford type A aortic dissection.斯坦福A型主动脉夹层术后肝功能障碍预测模型的建立与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22126. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06024-7.
5
Hypothermic circulatory arrest time affects neurological outcomes of frozen elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.低温停循环时间对急性 A 型主动脉夹层的冷冻象鼻手术的神经结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Card Surg. 2021 Sep;36(9):3337-3351. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15700. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
6
Development of machine learning model for predicting prolonged operation time in lumbar stenosis undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study.用于预测接受后路腰椎椎间融合术的腰椎管狭窄症患者手术时间延长的机器学习模型的开发:一项多中心研究。
Spine J. 2025 Mar;25(3):460-473. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.10.001. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
7
Construction and validation of HBV-ACLF bacterial infection diagnosis model based on machine learning.基于机器学习的HBV-ACLF细菌感染诊断模型的构建与验证
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):847. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11199-5.
8
External validation of a machine learning prediction model for massive blood loss during surgery for spinal metastases: a multi-institutional study using 880 patients.脊柱转移瘤手术中大量失血的机器学习预测模型的外部验证:一项使用880例患者的多机构研究。
Spine J. 2025 Jul;25(7):1386-1399. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.018. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
9
Aortic remodeling, distal stent-graft induced new entry and endoleak following frozen elephant trunk: A systematic review and meta-analysis.主动脉重塑、冰冻象鼻术后远端支架移植物导致的新入口和内漏:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Card Surg. 2022 Nov;37(11):3848-3862. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16918. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
10
Classification and outcomes of extended arch repair for acute Type A aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急性A型主动脉夹层扩大弓部修复的分类与预后:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Mar 1;24(3):450-459. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw355.

本文引用的文献

1
Harnessing the power of artificial intelligence in predicting all-cause mortality in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.利用人工智能预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术全因死亡率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 May 31;11:1343210. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1343210. eCollection 2024.
2
Major adverse outcomes in patients with acute type A aortic dissection undergoing total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk procedure.行孙氏全主动脉弓替换加主动脉弓部象鼻手术的急性 A 型主动脉夹层患者的主要不良结局。
Int J Cardiol. 2024 Nov 15;415:132254. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132254. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
3
A predictive model for postoperative adverse outcomes following surgical treatment of acute type A aortic dissection based on machine learning.
基于机器学习的急性 A 型主动脉夹层手术治疗后不良结局的预测模型。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2024 Mar;26(3):251-261. doi: 10.1111/jch.14774. Epub 2024 Feb 11.
4
Predicting Colorectal Cancer Survival Using Time-to-Event Machine Learning: Retrospective Cohort Study.基于生存事件的机器学习预测结直肠癌患者生存情况:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 26;25:e44417. doi: 10.2196/44417.
5
Inflammatory risk stratification individualizes anti-inflammatory pharmacotherapy for acute type A aortic dissection.炎症风险分层使急性A型主动脉夹层的抗炎药物治疗个体化。
Innovation (Camb). 2023 May 25;4(4):100448. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100448. eCollection 2023 Jul 10.
6
Management of Thoracic Aortic Dissection.胸主动脉夹层的管理
JAMA. 2023 Mar 7;329(9):756-757. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.0265.
7
Circulating biomarker-based risk stratifications individualize arch repair strategy of acute Type A aortic dissection via the XGBoosting algorithm.基于循环生物标志物的风险分层通过XGBoosting算法个体化急性A型主动脉夹层的主动脉弓修复策略。
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022 Nov 1;3(4):587-599. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztac068. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2022 ACC/AHA 血管疾病诊断与管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec 13;80(24):e223-e393. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
9
Survival after operative repair of acute type A aortic dissection varies according to the presence and type of preoperative malperfusion.急性 A 型主动脉夹层手术后的存活率因术前存在的和类型的灌注不良而异。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Jul;168(1):37-49.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.09.034. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
10
Early Mortality in Type A Acute Aortic Dissection: Insights From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection.A型急性主动脉夹层的早期死亡率:国际急性主动脉夹层注册研究的新见解。
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Oct 1;7(10):1009-1015. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.2718.