Idjaton Babatoundé I T, Togola Anne, Ghestem Jean Philippe, Kastler Laura, Bristeau Sébastien, Ronteltap Mariska, Colombano Stéfan, Devau Nicolas, Lions Julie, van Hullebusch Eric D
BRGM, Direction Eau Environnement Procédés et Analyses, 3 av. Claude-Guillemin - BP 36009, 45060 Orléans, France; Université Paris Cité, Institut de physique du globe de Paris, CNRS, F-75005 Paris, France.
BRGM, Direction Eau Environnement Procédés et Analyses, 3 av. Claude-Guillemin - BP 36009, 45060 Orléans, France.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jul 1;932:172589. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172589. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
Emerging contaminants are a growing concern for scientists and public authorities. The group of per-polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), known as 'forever chemicals', in complex environmental liquid and solid matrices was analysed in this study. The development of global analytical methods based on combustion ion chromatography (CIC) is expected to provide accurate picture of the overall PFAS contamination level via the determination of extractable organic fluorine (EOF) and adsorbable organic fluorine (AOF). The obtained results may be put into perspective with other methods such as targeted analyses (LC-MS/MS). The impact of pH, the presence of dissolved organic carbon and suspended particles on AOF measurements were explored. The effectiveness of the washing step to remove adsorbed inorganic fluorine (IF) has been proven for samples containing up to 8 mgF.L. CIC-based methods showed good repeatability and reproducibility for the complex matrices studied. Environmental applications of these methods have been tested. AOF and EOF analyses could explain between 1 % and 23 % and 0.1 % to 2 % of total organic fluorine (TOF), respectively. The sum of PFAS compounds expressed as fluorine could explain from 0.2 % to 11 % and from 0.003 % to 5 % for AOF and EOF, respectively. These results also suggest that some fluorinated compounds are not adsorbed or extractable and/or lost by volatilisation during the application of AOF and EOF analytical procedure. These findings highlight that AOF and EOF are not entirely efficient as proxy to assess "total PFAS" for assessing environmental contamination by PFAS. However, these methods could still be applied to gain a better understanding of the sources and fate of PFAS in the environment.
新兴污染物日益引起科学家和公共当局的关注。本研究分析了复杂环境液体和固体基质中的全氟烷基物质(PFAS)组,即所谓的“永久性化学物质”。基于燃烧离子色谱法(CIC)的全球分析方法的发展有望通过测定可提取有机氟(EOF)和可吸附有机氟(AOF),提供PFAS总体污染水平的准确情况。所得结果可与其他方法(如靶向分析(LC-MS/MS))进行对比。探讨了pH值、溶解有机碳和悬浮颗粒的存在对AOF测量的影响。对于含氟量高达8mgF.L的样品,已证明洗涤步骤去除吸附的无机氟(IF)的有效性。基于CIC的方法对所研究的复杂基质显示出良好的重复性和再现性。已测试了这些方法在环境中的应用。AOF和EOF分析分别可解释总有机氟(TOF)的1%至23%和0.1%至2%。以氟表示的PFAS化合物总和分别可解释AOF的0.2%至11%和EOF的0.003%至5%。这些结果还表明,在应用AOF和EOF分析程序期间,一些氟化化合物未被吸附或提取和/或因挥发而损失。这些发现突出表明,AOF和EOF作为评估PFAS环境污染的“总PFAS”替代指标并不完全有效。然而,这些方法仍可用于更好地了解环境中PFAS的来源和归宿。