Steensberg J
Scand J Soc Med Suppl. 1985;36:1-39.
Based on case material from the late 1970s and early 1980s from the Institution of Medical Officers of Health covering a Danish county some examples of practical indoor climate problems in day institutions for children are given. Insufficient ventilation of premises is probably the single most important factor in the development of indoor climate problems. An effective cleaning generally improves the indoor air. The study particularly illustrates the administrative and policy perspectives of the decision making process. Those that make decisions on indoor climate problems unfortunately seem to favour a narrow definition of health, i.e. the absence of overt disease; and they are not always aware that the relationship between indoor climate factors and health effects cannot be proven in an absolute sense. Experts on the scientific aspects are needed but their statements are influenced by personal values and their perception of the reasonable balance between health protection and social costs. One of the main factors influencing the indoor climate situation in Danish day institutions for children has been the lack of an adequate regulatory framework; and the central administration and responsible ministers have failed to use the already existing legislative powers to prevent problems. Decision making in cases on the indoor climate of institutions should be accelerated; we cannot wait for proof before taking preventive measures. The indoor air of institutions is a "public good" to the same extent as the ambient air and the responsible authorities have an obligation to regulate accordingly. When building regulations prove insufficient other central authorities must support local decision makers with more specific directions. Testing of building materials, hazard rating and an approval system is needed. Guidelines on indoor climate requirements for public institutions should be developed. In countries with a built-up system of child institutions and a decreasing birth rate it is especially important to improve the already existing institutions. In our regulatory and administrative practice we must restore the balance between the present concern for the health of the adult working population and the insufficient protection of children. We obviously need more research but increased attention should be paid to the administrative and political barriers that prevent improvements of the indoor air.
基于20世纪70年代末和80年代初丹麦一个郡卫生官员机构的案例材料,给出了儿童日间机构一些实际室内气候问题的例子。场所通风不足可能是室内气候问题产生的唯一最重要因素。有效的清洁通常会改善室内空气。该研究特别说明了决策过程中的行政和政策观点。不幸的是,那些对室内气候问题做出决策的人似乎倾向于对健康的狭义定义,即没有明显疾病;而且他们并不总是意识到室内气候因素与健康影响之间的关系无法得到绝对证明。需要科学方面的专家,但他们的陈述会受到个人价值观以及他们对健康保护与社会成本之间合理平衡的认知的影响。影响丹麦儿童日间机构室内气候状况的主要因素之一是缺乏适当的监管框架;中央行政部门和负责的部长未能运用现有的立法权力来预防问题。机构室内气候案件的决策应加快;我们不能等到有证据才采取预防措施。机构的室内空气与周围空气一样,在同等程度上是一种“公共物品”,负责的当局有义务进行相应监管。当建筑法规证明不足时,其他中央当局必须以更具体的指示支持地方决策者。需要对建筑材料进行测试、进行危害评级并建立审批制度。应制定公共机构室内气候要求的指导方针。在儿童机构体系完善且出生率下降的国家,改善现有机构尤为重要。在我们的监管和行政实践中,我们必须恢复当前对成年劳动人口健康的关注与对儿童保护不足之间的平衡。显然我们需要更多研究,但应更加关注阻碍室内空气质量改善的行政和政治障碍。