• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会疼痛问卷波斯语版本的心理测量学特性及项目反应理论分析

Psychometric properties and item response theory analysis of the Persian version of the social pain questionnaire.

作者信息

Sepehrinia Mahya, Farahani Hojjatollah, Watson Peter, Amini Nasim

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 12;15:1372229. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1372229. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1372229
PMID:38680284
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11050036/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Social pain is an emotional reaction which is triggered by social exclusion and has been extensively investigated in the literature. The Social Pain Questionnaire (SPQ) is a self-report instrument which is the only scale for measuring social pain as a dispositional factor. The current study aimed at examining the psychometric properties of the SPQ in an Iranian sample.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A sample of participants ( = 400) was recruited in a cross-sectional validation study. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) as well as Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were conducted. The Item Response Theory (IRT) model parameters were evaluated and item response category curves were presented. Convergent and divergent validities as well as the reliability (by using Cronbach's alpha coefficient) were also assessed.

RESULTS

The SPQ's unidimensionality was affirmed (RMSEA = 0.078; CFI = 0.915; TLI = 0.99) and its internal consistency was robust (Cronbach's α = 0.94). The correlation between the SPQ and the following measures endorsed its divergent and convergent validity: Self-esteem ( = -0.424), Perceived Social Support ( = -0.161), and Interpersonal Sensitivity ( = 0.636). Finally, Item Response Theory Analysis emphasized the effectiveness of the SPQ items in discerning various levels of social pain. The theta level ranged between -1 and + 1.2 and the IRT-based marginal reliability was 0.92 for the total score.

DISCUSSION

The Persian SPQ stands as a reliable and valid measure for evaluating social pain. This scale has the potential to stimulate further research in the field for both clinical and non-clinical settings.

CONCLUSION

By employing Item Response Theory (IRT) analysis, we have transcended the theoretical psychometric evaluation of the SPQ scale and demonstrated that SPQ is a unidimensional, valid and reliable measurement tool.

摘要

引言

社会疼痛是一种由社会排斥引发的情绪反应,在文献中已得到广泛研究。社会疼痛问卷(SPQ)是一种自我报告工具,是测量作为一种特质因素的社会疼痛的唯一量表。本研究旨在检验SPQ在伊朗样本中的心理测量特性。

材料与方法

在一项横断面验证研究中招募了400名参与者作为样本。进行了探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)。评估了项目反应理论(IRT)模型参数并呈现了项目反应类别曲线。还评估了聚合效度和区分效度以及信度(使用克朗巴哈α系数)。

结果

确认了SPQ的单维度性(RMSEA = 0.078;CFI = 0.915;TLI = 0.99),其内部一致性较强(克朗巴哈α = 0.94)。SPQ与以下测量指标之间的相关性支持了其区分效度和聚合效度:自尊(r = -0.424)、感知社会支持(r = -0.161)和人际敏感性(r = 0.636)。最后,项目反应理论分析强调了SPQ项目在区分不同水平社会疼痛方面的有效性。θ水平在-1至 +1.2之间,基于IRT的总分边际信度为0.92。

讨论

波斯语版SPQ是评估社会疼痛的可靠有效测量工具。该量表有可能促进该领域在临床和非临床环境中的进一步研究。

结论

通过采用项目反应理论(IRT)分析,我们超越了对SPQ量表的理论心理测量评估,并证明SPQ是一种单维度、有效且可靠的测量工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d6/11050036/52084b00a1e5/fpsyg-15-1372229-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d6/11050036/78e8756d2359/fpsyg-15-1372229-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d6/11050036/7b3d63d7bf74/fpsyg-15-1372229-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d6/11050036/6b717d37e668/fpsyg-15-1372229-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d6/11050036/3575c8641281/fpsyg-15-1372229-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d6/11050036/52084b00a1e5/fpsyg-15-1372229-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d6/11050036/78e8756d2359/fpsyg-15-1372229-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d6/11050036/7b3d63d7bf74/fpsyg-15-1372229-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d6/11050036/6b717d37e668/fpsyg-15-1372229-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d6/11050036/3575c8641281/fpsyg-15-1372229-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d6/11050036/52084b00a1e5/fpsyg-15-1372229-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties and item response theory analysis of the Persian version of the social pain questionnaire.社会疼痛问卷波斯语版本的心理测量学特性及项目反应理论分析
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 12;15:1372229. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1372229. eCollection 2024.
2
Examining psychometric properties of the Iranian version of exclusive breastfeeding social support scale (EBFSS).考察伊朗版纯母乳喂养社会支持量表(EBFSS)的心理测量特性。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Aug 16;11(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01262-8.
3
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
4
Psychometric properties of the educational leadership scale for nursing students.护理专业学生教育领导力量表的心理测量学特性
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 6;25(1):656. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07269-6.
5
The translation and validation of the surgical anxiety questionnaire into the modern standard Arabic language: results from classical test theory and item response theory analyses.将手术焦虑问卷翻译成现代标准阿拉伯语并进行验证:来自经典测试理论和项目反应理论分析的结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 16;24(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06142-y.
6
Assessment of the validity and reliability of the nurses' professional values scale-revised in Persian version among nursing students.评估波斯语版修订后的护士职业价值观量表在护理专业学生中的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 25;25(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06677-y.
7
Development and Preliminary Validation of the Physical Education-Study Process Questionnaire : Insights for Physical Education University Students.《体育-学习过程问卷的编制与初步验证:对体育专业大学生的启示》。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 17;10:856167. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.856167. eCollection 2022.
8
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Social Participation Questionnaire: A Methodological and Cross-Sectional Study.社会参与问卷的编制与心理计量学评估:一种方法学和横断面研究。
Am J Health Promot. 2025 Jan;39(1):28-38. doi: 10.1177/08901171241258808. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
9
A psychometric study of the Flourishing Scale for people living with dementia.一项针对痴呆症患者的蓬勃发展量表的心理测量学研究。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025 May 24;11(2):e70097. doi: 10.1002/trc2.70097. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
10
Persian version of the brief Older People's Quality of Life questionnaire (OPQOL-brief): the evaluation of the psychometric properties.简要老年人生活质量问卷(OPQOL-brief)的波斯语版本:心理测量特性评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 7;18(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01586-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Pain in the brain: Psychological correlates of chronic pain and fibromyalgia.脑部疼痛:慢性疼痛和纤维肌痛的心理关联
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 11;20(6):e0324457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324457. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Mental Imagery and Social Pain in Adolescents-Analysis of Imagery Characteristics and Perspective-A Pilot Study.青少年的心理意象与社会疼痛——意象特征与视角分析——一项初步研究
Children (Basel). 2021 Dec 8;8(12):1160. doi: 10.3390/children8121160.
2
Development and validation of a new instrument to measure social pain.一种用于测量社会疼痛的新工具的开发与验证。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 15;11(1):8283. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87351-3.
3
Social exclusion reliably engages the default network: A meta-analysis of Cyberball.社会排斥可靠地激活默认网络:对赛博球实验的元分析。
Neuroimage. 2021 Feb 15;227:117666. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117666. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
4
Coping with social wounds: How social pain and social anxiety influence access to social rewards.应对社会创伤:社会痛苦和社会焦虑如何影响社会奖励的获取。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;68:101572. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2020.101572. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
5
Social support modulates the neural correlates underlying social exclusion.社会支持调节社会排斥的神经相关因素。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 Aug 7;14(6):633-643. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsz033.
6
Alleviating Social Pain: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Forgiveness and Acetaminophen.缓解社会痛苦:宽恕和对乙酰氨基酚的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Ann Behav Med. 2019 Nov 9;53(12):1045-1054. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaz015.
7
Does Self-Esteem Have an Interpersonal Imprint Beyond Self-Reports? A Meta-Analysis of Self-Esteem and Objective Interpersonal Indicators.自尊是否具有自我报告之外的人际印记?自尊和客观人际指标的元分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2019 Feb;23(1):73-102. doi: 10.1177/1088868318756532. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
8
The psychometric properties of the Persian version of Interpersonal Sensitivity Measure.人际敏感性测量波斯语版本的心理测量特性。
J Res Med Sci. 2017 Jan 27;22:10. doi: 10.4103/1735-1995.199093. eCollection 2017.
9
Patients Are Socially Excluded When Their Pain Has No Medical Explanation.当患者的疼痛无法得到医学解释时,他们会在社会层面受到排斥。
J Pain. 2016 Sep;17(9):1028-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
10
The push of social pain: Does rejection's sting motivate subsequent social reconnection?社会痛苦的推动:拒绝的刺痛是否会激发随后的社会重新连接?
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Jun;16(3):541-50. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0412-9.