Suppr超能文献

培养医学四年级学生评估编写者未开发的整合专业知识。

Nurturing Untapped Integration Expertise of MS4 Assessment Writers.

作者信息

Dale Esther, Schowengerdt Bethany, Violato Claudio

机构信息

University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN USA.

University of Minnesota College of Education and Human Development, Minneapolis, MN USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2024 Jan 13;34(2):315-318. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-01974-5. eCollection 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Creating original, integrated multiple-choice questions (MCQs) is time-consuming and onerous for basic science and clinical faculty. We demonstrate that medical students are co-experts to overcome assessment challenges of the faculty. We recruited, trained, and motivated medical students to write 10,000 high-quality MCQs for use in the foundational courses of medical education. These students were ideal because they possessed integrated knowledge (basic sciences and clinical experience). We taught them how to write high-quality MCQs using a writing template and continuous monitoring and support by an item bank curator. The students themselves also benefitted personally and pedagogically from the experience.

摘要

对于基础科学和临床学科的教员而言,创建原创、综合的多项选择题既耗时又费力。我们证明医学生可以成为共同专家,以克服教员在评估方面面临的挑战。我们招募、培训并激励医学生编写10000道高质量的多项选择题,用于医学教育的基础课程。这些学生非常理想,因为他们具备综合知识(基础科学和临床经验)。我们教他们如何使用写作模板编写高质量的多项选择题,并由题库管理员进行持续监督和支持。学生们自身也从这段经历中在个人和学习方面有所收获。

相似文献

1
6
Effect of Faculty Training on Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions.教师培训对多项选择题质量的影响。
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2020 Jul-Sep;10(3):210-214. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_30_20. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
7
Writing Multiple Choice Questions-Has the Student Become the Master?编写多项选择题——学生是否已经成为主人?
Teach Learn Med. 2023 Jun-Jul;35(3):356-367. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2050240. Epub 2022 May 1.

本文引用的文献

3
Multiple Choice Questions in a Nutshell: Theory, Practice, and Postexam Item Analysis.
Acad Med. 2020 Apr;95(4):659. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003096.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验