• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

培养医学四年级学生评估编写者未开发的整合专业知识。

Nurturing Untapped Integration Expertise of MS4 Assessment Writers.

作者信息

Dale Esther, Schowengerdt Bethany, Violato Claudio

机构信息

University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN USA.

University of Minnesota College of Education and Human Development, Minneapolis, MN USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2024 Jan 13;34(2):315-318. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-01974-5. eCollection 2024 Apr.

DOI:10.1007/s40670-024-01974-5
PMID:38686140
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11055828/
Abstract

Creating original, integrated multiple-choice questions (MCQs) is time-consuming and onerous for basic science and clinical faculty. We demonstrate that medical students are co-experts to overcome assessment challenges of the faculty. We recruited, trained, and motivated medical students to write 10,000 high-quality MCQs for use in the foundational courses of medical education. These students were ideal because they possessed integrated knowledge (basic sciences and clinical experience). We taught them how to write high-quality MCQs using a writing template and continuous monitoring and support by an item bank curator. The students themselves also benefitted personally and pedagogically from the experience.

摘要

对于基础科学和临床学科的教员而言,创建原创、综合的多项选择题既耗时又费力。我们证明医学生可以成为共同专家,以克服教员在评估方面面临的挑战。我们招募、培训并激励医学生编写10000道高质量的多项选择题,用于医学教育的基础课程。这些学生非常理想,因为他们具备综合知识(基础科学和临床经验)。我们教他们如何使用写作模板编写高质量的多项选择题,并由题库管理员进行持续监督和支持。学生们自身也从这段经历中在个人和学习方面有所收获。

相似文献

1
Nurturing Untapped Integration Expertise of MS4 Assessment Writers.培养医学四年级学生评估编写者未开发的整合专业知识。
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Jan 13;34(2):315-318. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-01974-5. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.一种由学生主导的新颖方法,用于生成多项选择题并创建在线数据库,同时有针对性地征求临床医生的意见。
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(2):182-8. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1011651.
3
What faculty write versus what students see? Perspectives on multiple-choice questions using Bloom's taxonomy.教师编写与学生所见?关于使用布卢姆认知目标分类学的多项选择题的观点。
Med Teach. 2021 May;43(5):575-582. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1879376. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
4
ChatGPT Knowledge Evaluation in Basic and Clinical Medical Sciences: Multiple Choice Question Examination-Based Performance.基础医学与临床医学中ChatGPT的知识评估:基于多项选择题考试的表现
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 17;11(14):2046. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11142046.
5
Will a Short Training Session Improve Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Quality by Dental School Faculty? A Pilot Study.短期培训课程能否提高牙科学院教师编写选择题的质量?一项试点研究。
J Dent Educ. 2017 Aug;81(8):948-955. doi: 10.21815/JDE.017.047.
6
Effect of Faculty Training on Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions.教师培训对多项选择题质量的影响。
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2020 Jul-Sep;10(3):210-214. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_30_20. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
7
Writing Multiple Choice Questions-Has the Student Become the Master?编写多项选择题——学生是否已经成为主人?
Teach Learn Med. 2023 Jun-Jul;35(3):356-367. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2050240. Epub 2022 May 1.
8
Efficacy of Faculty Development Training Workshops (FDTWs) on Writing High-Quality Multiple-Choice Questions at Northern Border University (NBU) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).沙特阿拉伯王国(KSA)北部边境大学(NBU)教师发展培训工作坊(FDTWs)在编写高质量多项选择题方面的成效。
Cureus. 2024 Jun 18;16(6):e62607. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62607. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Medical students create multiple-choice questions for learning in pathology education: a pilot study.医学生在病理学教育中创建多选题进行学习:一项试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Aug 22;18(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1312-1.
10
The Role of Faculty Development in Improving the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions in Dental Education.教师发展在提高牙医学教育多项选择题质量中的作用。
J Dent Educ. 2020 Mar;84(3):316-322. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.189.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive perspectives on maintaining physicians' medical expertise: II. Acquiring, maintaining, and updating cognitive skills.认知视角下的医师医疗专业技能保持:二、认知技能的习得、维持和更新。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Jul 25;8(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00497-8.
2
Motivations of assessment item writers in medical programs: a qualitative study.医学专业评估项目编写者的动机:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02229-8.
3
Multiple Choice Questions in a Nutshell: Theory, Practice, and Postexam Item Analysis.
Acad Med. 2020 Apr;95(4):659. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003096.
4
How do physicians become medical experts? A test of three competing theories: distinct domains, independent influence and encapsulation models.医生如何成为医学专家?三种竞争理论的检验:不同领域、独立影响和封装模型。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 May;23(2):249-263. doi: 10.1007/s10459-017-9784-z. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
5
The impact of item-writing flaws and item complexity on examination item difficulty and discrimination value.试题编写缺陷和试题复杂度对考试试题难度及区分度的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Sep 29;16(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0773-3.
6
Standard Setting Methods for Pass/Fail Decisions on High-Stakes Objective Structured Clinical Examinations: A Validity Study.高风险客观结构化临床考试中通过/失败决策的标准设定方法:一项效度研究
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(3):280-91. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1044749.
7
Very long-term retention of basic science knowledge in doctors after graduation.医生毕业后基础科学知识的长期保留。
Med Educ. 2011 Apr;45(4):422-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03889.x.
8
Knowledge loss of medical students on first year basic science courses at the University of Saskatchewan.萨斯喀彻温大学医学院学生在第一年基础科学课程中的知识遗忘情况。
BMC Med Educ. 2006 Jan 14;6:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-5.
9
The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education.违反标准试题编写原则对考试及学生的影响:医学教育中使用有缺陷的试题对成绩考试的后果。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2005;10(2):133-43. doi: 10.1007/s10459-004-4019-5.