• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区卫生环境下选择架构和邮寄结直肠癌筛查外展的随机试验。

A Randomized Trial of Choice Architecture and Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach in a Community Health Setting.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Health Care Innovation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Health Care Innovation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Oct;22(10):2117-2124.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.04.003. Epub 2024 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2024.04.003
PMID:38697235
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11424265/
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Mailed outreach for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening increases uptake but it is unclear how to offer the choice of testing. We evaluated if the active choice between colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical test (FIT), or FIT alone, increased response compared with colonoscopy alone.

METHODS

This pragmatic, randomized, controlled trial at a community health center included patients between ages 50 and 74 who were not up to date with CRC screening. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to the following: (1) colonoscopy only, (2) active choice of colonoscopy or FIT, or (3) FIT only. Patients received an outreach letter with instructions for testing (colonoscopy referral and/or an enclosed FIT kit), a reminder letter at 2 months, and another reminder at 3 to 5 months via text message or automated voice recording. The primary outcome was CRC screening completion within 6 months.

RESULTS

Among 738 patients in the final analysis, the mean age was 58.7 years (SD, 6.2 y); 48.6% were insured by Medicaid and 24.3% were insured by Medicare; and 71.7% were White, 16.9% were Black, and 7.3% were Hispanic/Latino. At 6 months, 5.6% (95% CI, 2.8-8.5) completed screening in the colonoscopy-only arm, 12.8% (95% CI, 8.6-17.0) in the active-choice arm, and 11.3% (95% CI, 7.4-15.3) in the FIT-only arm. Compared with colonoscopy only, there was a significant increase in screening in active choice (absolute difference, 7.1%; 95% CI, 2.0-12.2; P = .006) and FIT only (absolute difference, 5.7%; 95% CI, 0.8-10.6; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Both choice of testing and FIT alone increased response and may align with patient preferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov NCT04711473.

摘要

背景与目的

邮寄结直肠癌(CRC)筛查外展服务可提高筛查参与率,但目前尚不清楚如何提供检测选择。我们评估了与单独进行结肠镜检查相比,主动选择结肠镜检查和粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)或仅进行 FIT 是否会增加响应率。

方法

这项在社区卫生中心开展的实用、随机、对照试验纳入了年龄在 50 至 74 岁之间且未进行 CRC 筛查的患者。患者按 1:1:1 的比例随机分配至以下三组:(1)仅结肠镜检查;(2)主动选择结肠镜检查或 FIT,或(3)仅 FIT。患者收到了一封带有检测说明的外展信(结肠镜检查转诊和/或随附的 FIT 试剂盒),2 个月时收到提醒信,3 至 5 个月时通过短信或自动语音记录进行再次提醒。主要结局是在 6 个月内完成 CRC 筛查。

结果

在最终分析的 738 例患者中,平均年龄为 58.7 岁(标准差,6.2 岁);48.6%有医疗保险,24.3%有医疗保险;71.7%为白人,16.9%为黑人,7.3%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔。在 6 个月时,结肠镜检查组中有 5.6%(95%CI,2.8-8.5)完成了筛查,主动选择组中有 12.8%(95%CI,8.6-17.0),FIT 组中有 11.3%(95%CI,7.4-15.3)。与单独结肠镜检查相比,主动选择检测(绝对差异,7.1%;95%CI,2.0-12.2;P =.006)和仅 FIT(绝对差异,5.7%;95%CI,0.8-10.6;P =.02)的筛查率均显著增加。

结论

检测选择和仅 FIT 均可提高响应率,并且可能符合患者的偏好。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov NCT04711473。

相似文献

1
A Randomized Trial of Choice Architecture and Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach in a Community Health Setting.社区卫生环境下选择架构和邮寄结直肠癌筛查外展的随机试验。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Oct;22(10):2117-2124.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.04.003. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
2
Effect of Sequential or Active Choice for Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach: A Randomized Clinical Trial.序贯或主动选择用于结直肠癌筛查推广的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e1910305. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10305.
3
Centralized Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.在联邦合格健康中心开展集中结直肠癌筛查外展活动:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2446693. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46693.
4
Mailed Outreach and Patient Navigation for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Rural Medicaid Enrollees: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.针对农村医疗补助计划参保者的结直肠癌筛查邮件外展与患者导航服务:一项整群随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250928. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0928.
5
Effect of Colonoscopy Outreach vs Fecal Immunochemical Test Outreach on Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.结肠镜检查外展与粪便免疫化学检测外展对结直肠癌筛查完成率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2017 Sep 5;318(9):806-815. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11389.
6
Comparative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test outreach, colonoscopy outreach, and usual care for boosting colorectal cancer screening among the underserved: a randomized clinical trial.在服务不足人群中提高结直肠癌筛查率的粪便免疫化学试验外展、结肠镜外展与常规护理的效果比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Oct 14;173(18):1725-32. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9294.
7
Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics: The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.社区健康诊所中邮寄式结直肠癌筛查推广项目的效果:STOP CRC 整群随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Sep 1;178(9):1174-1181. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3629.
8
Effect of Patient Portal Messaging Before Mailing Fecal Immunochemical Test Kit on Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates: A Randomized Clinical Trial.患者门户消息传递对邮寄粪便免疫化学检测试剂盒前后对结直肠癌筛查率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2146863. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46863.
9
Comparative effectiveness of mailed reminders with and without fecal immunochemical tests for Medicaid beneficiaries at a large county health department: A randomized controlled trial.邮寄提醒与粪便免疫化学试验联合应用与单纯邮寄提醒对大型县级卫生部门医疗补助受益人的比较效果:一项随机对照试验。
Cancer. 2018 Aug;124(16):3346-3354. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31566. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
10
Effect of Financial Incentives on Patient Use of Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests: A Randomized Clinical Trial.经济激励对邮寄结直肠癌筛查试验患者使用的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e191156. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1156.

引用本文的文献

1
Population Health Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies in Adults Aged 45 to 49 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial.45至49岁成年人的群体健康结直肠癌筛查策略:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2025 Aug 4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.12049.
2
Disparities in Cancer Screening Among the Foreign-Born Population in the United States: A Narrative Review.美国外国出生人口的癌症筛查差异:一项叙述性综述。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 8;17(4):576. doi: 10.3390/cancers17040576.

本文引用的文献

1
Participation in Competing Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Health Services Study (PICCOLINO Study).参与结直肠癌筛查的竞争策略:一项随机卫生服务研究(PICCOLINO 研究)。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Mar;160(4):1097-1105. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.11.049. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
2
Effect of Sequential or Active Choice for Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach: A Randomized Clinical Trial.序贯或主动选择用于结直肠癌筛查推广的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e1910305. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10305.
3
Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.评估旨在提高美国结直肠癌筛查率的干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1645-1658. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4637.
4
Active Choice and Financial Incentives to Increase Rates of Screening Colonoscopy-A Randomized Controlled Trial.增加结肠镜筛查率的主动选择和经济激励措施——一项随机对照试验
Gastroenterology. 2017 Nov;153(5):1227-1229.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.07.015. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
5
Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌筛查:美国多学会专家组对医生和患者的建议。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul;112(7):1016-1030. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.174. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
6
Cancer Statistics, 2017.《2017 年癌症统计》
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
7
Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in reducing the risk of death from right and left colon cancer: a large community-based study.筛查结肠镜检查在降低左右结肠癌死亡风险中的有效性:一项基于社区的大型研究。
Gut. 2018 Feb;67(2):291-298. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312712. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
8
Race/Ethnicity and Adoption of a Population Health Management Approach to Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Community-Based Healthcare System.种族/族裔与社区医疗系统中采用人群健康管理方法进行结直肠癌筛查
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Nov;31(11):1323-1330. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3792-1. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
9
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2564-2575. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5989.
10
Adherence to Competing Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening Over 3 Years.三年内对结直肠癌筛查竞争策略的依从性
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;111(1):105-14. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.367. Epub 2015 Nov 3.