Merz Sibille, Aksakal Tuğba, Hibtay Ariam, Yücesoy Hilâl, Fieselmann Jana, Annaç Kübra, Yılmaz-Aslan Yüce, Brzoska Patrick, Tezcan-Güntekin Hürrem
Faculty of Health and Education, Alice Salomon University of Applied Sciences, Alice-Salomon-Platz 5, 12627, Berlin, Germany.
Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Health Services Research Unit. Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50, 58448, Witten, Germany.
Int J Equity Health. 2024 May 2;23(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02156-w.
Racism in the healthcare system has become a burgeoning focus in health policy-making and research. Existing research has shown both interpersonal and structural forms of racism limiting access to quality healthcare for racialised healthcare users. Nevertheless, little is known about the specifics of racism in the inpatient sector, specifically hospitals and rehabilitation facilities. The aim of this scoping review is therefore to map the evidence on racial discrimination experienced by people receiving treatment in inpatient settings (hospitals and rehabilitation facilities) or their caregivers in high-income countries, focusing specifically on whether intersectional axes of discrimination have been taken into account when describing these experiences.
Based on the conceptual framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley, this scoping review surveyed existing research on racism and racial discrimination in inpatient care in high-income countries published between 2013 and 2023. The software Rayyan was used to support the screening process while MAXQDA was used for thematic coding.
Forty-seven articles were included in this review. Specifics of the inpatient sector included different hospitalisation, admission and referral rates within and across hospitals; the threat of racial discrimination from other healthcare users; and the spatial segregation of healthcare users according to ethnic, religious or racialised criteria. While most articles described some interactions between race and other social categories in the sample composition, the framework of intersectionality was rarely considered explicitly during analysis.
While the USA continue to predominate in discussions, other high-income countries including Canada, Australia and the UK also examine racism in their own healthcare systems. Absent from the literature are studies from a wider range of European countries as well as of racialised and disadvantaged groups other than refugees or recent immigrants. Research in this area would also benefit from an engagement with approaches to intersectionality in public health to produce a more nuanced understanding of the interactions of racism with other axes of discrimination. As inpatient care exhibits a range of specific structures, future research and policy-making ought to consider these specifics to develop targeted interventions, including training for non-clinical staff and robust, transparent and accessible complaint procedures.
医疗保健系统中的种族主义已成为卫生政策制定和研究中一个迅速发展的焦点。现有研究表明,人际层面和结构性的种族主义形式限制了被种族化的医疗保健使用者获得高质量医疗保健的机会。然而,对于住院部门,特别是医院和康复设施中种族主义的具体情况却知之甚少。因此,本范围综述的目的是梳理高收入国家住院环境(医院和康复设施)中接受治疗的患者或其护理人员所经历的种族歧视证据,特别关注在描述这些经历时是否考虑到交叉歧视轴。
基于阿克西和奥马利开发的概念框架进行本范围综述,对2013年至2023年期间发表的关于高收入国家住院护理中种族主义和种族歧视的现有研究进行了调查。使用Rayyan软件支持筛选过程,而MAXQDA用于主题编码。
本综述纳入了47篇文章。住院部门的具体情况包括医院内部和不同医院之间不同的住院、入院和转诊率;来自其他医疗保健使用者的种族歧视威胁;以及根据种族、宗教或种族化标准对医疗保健使用者进行空间隔离。虽然大多数文章描述了样本构成中种族与其他社会类别之间的一些相互作用,但在分析过程中很少明确考虑交叉性框架。
虽然美国在相关讨论中仍占主导地位,但包括加拿大、澳大利亚和英国在内的其他高收入国家也在审视其自身医疗保健系统中的种族主义。文献中缺乏来自更广泛欧洲国家的研究,以及除难民或新移民之外的其他被种族化和弱势群体的研究。该领域的研究也将受益于与公共卫生领域交叉性方法的结合,以便更细致入微地理解种族主义与其他歧视轴之间的相互作用。由于住院护理呈现出一系列特定结构,未来的研究和政策制定应考虑这些具体情况,以制定有针对性的干预措施,包括对非临床工作人员的培训以及健全、透明且便于使用的投诉程序。