Department of Sociology and Legal Studies and School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2024 Sep 20;36(3). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzae089.
Health inequity between Indigenous (First Nations, Inuit, and Métis) peoples and other citizens is an important policy concern in Canada, as in other colonial countries. Racism in healthcare has been identified as contributing to poorer care and to worse outcomes. Despite a large literature regarding racism in other healthcare contexts, the dimensions of the existing literature on anti-Indigenous racism in Canadian healthcare are unclear. A scoping review examined the evidence of anti-Indigenous racist experiences in healthcare in the research literature, including the types of racist behaviours identified, settings studied, and Indigenous populations and geographic regions included. We identified English and French language journal articles on anti-Indigenous racism in Canadian healthcare settings in Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, and the Bibliography of Indigenous Peoples in North America, and grey literature reports. A total of 2250 journal articles and 9 grey literature reports published since 2000 were included in screening, and 66 studies were included in the final review. Most used qualitative interviews with patients, but a large proportion included healthcare providers. Most were conducted in urban settings, a majority in Ontario or British Columbia, with mixed Indigenous populations. The largest proportion focussed on patient experiences with healthcare in general, rather than specific clinical contexts. Most racist experiences identified were 'covert' racism, including patients feeling treated differently from non-Indigenous patients, being ignored, treated more slowly, or not believed. Stereotyping of Indigenous peoples as substance users, poor patients, or poor parents was also commonly reported. 'Overt racism', including the use of racist slurs, was not widely found. Some quantitative studies did use standardized or validated instruments to capture racist experiences, but most did not result in generalizable estimates of their prevalence. The few studies linking racism to health outcomes found that experiencing racism was related to reluctance to seek healthcare, potentially leading to higher unmet healthcare needs. Gender was the intersecting dimension most identified as shaping healthcare experiences, with Indigenous women and girls at risk to specific stereotypes. Some papers suggested that socio-economically disadvantaged Indigenous people were at the highest risk to experiencing racism. Types of anti-Indigenous racism identified in Canadian healthcare appear similar to those reported in other jurisdictions. Indigenous peoples facing multiple dimensions of disadvantage, especially gender and social class, may be the most likely to experience racism. It is likely that the experience of racism in healthcare has implications for Indigenous peoples' health, mainly by reducing healthcare access.
在加拿大和其他殖民国家,原住民(第一民族、因纽特人和梅蒂斯人)与其他公民之间的健康不平等是一个重要的政策关注点。医疗保健中的种族主义被认为是导致护理质量下降和结果恶化的原因之一。尽管关于其他医疗保健背景下的种族主义有大量文献,但加拿大医疗保健中反原住民种族主义的现有文献的维度尚不清楚。一项范围审查检查了研究文献中医疗保健中反原住民种族主义经历的证据,包括确定的种族主义行为类型、研究的环境以及包括的原住民人口和地理区域。我们在 Scopus、PubMed、CINAHL 和北美原住民文献目录中,以及灰色文献报告中,确定了关于加拿大医疗保健环境中反原住民种族主义的英文和法文期刊文章。自 2000 年以来,共有 2250 篇期刊文章和 9 篇灰色文献报告进入筛选,66 项研究进入最终审查。大多数使用了与患者的定性访谈,但很大一部分包括医疗保健提供者。大多数研究是在城市环境中进行的,大部分在安大略省或不列颠哥伦比亚省,涉及混合的原住民人口。最大比例的研究侧重于患者对一般医疗保健的体验,而不是特定的临床背景。大多数确定的种族主义经历是“隐性”种族主义,包括患者感到与非原住民患者不同对待、被忽视、治疗速度较慢或不被信任。将原住民刻板化为药物使用者、贫困患者或贫困父母的情况也经常被报道。“显性”种族主义,包括使用种族诽谤,并不常见。一些定量研究确实使用了标准化或经过验证的工具来捕捉种族主义经历,但大多数研究没有得出其普遍性的患病率估计。少数将种族主义与健康结果联系起来的研究发现,经历种族主义与不愿寻求医疗保健有关,这可能导致未满足的医疗保健需求增加。性别是最被确定为影响医疗保健体验的交叉维度,原住民妇女和女孩面临着特定的刻板印象的风险。一些论文表明,在社会经济上处于不利地位的原住民面临遭受种族主义的风险最高。在加拿大医疗保健中确定的反原住民种族主义类型与其他司法管辖区报告的类型相似。面临多种劣势的原住民,特别是性别和社会阶层,最有可能经历种族主义。医疗保健中的种族主义经历很可能对原住民的健康产生影响,主要是通过减少获得医疗保健的机会。