• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在模拟器上从自动驾驶到手动驾驶的紧急接管中年龄和性别差异。

Age and gender differences in emergency takeover from automated to manual driving on simulator.

机构信息

Center for Injury Research and Prevention, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup2):S163-S165. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1661677. Epub 2019 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1080/15389588.2019.1661677
PMID:31663790
Abstract

The objective of this study was to explore how age and sex impact the ability to respond to an emergency when in a self-driving vehicle. For this study, 60 drivers (male: 48%, female: 52%) of different age groups (teens: aged 16-19, 32%, adults: aged 35-54, 37%, seniors: aged 65+, 32%) were recruited to share their perspectives on self-driving technology. They were invited to ride in a driving simulator that mimicked a vehicle in autopilot mode (longitudinal and lateral control). In a scenario where the automated vehicle unexpectedly drives toward a closed highway exit, 21% of drivers did not react at all. For this event, where drivers had 6.2 s to avoid a crash, 40% of drivers crashed. Adults aged 35-54 crashed less than other age groups (33% crash rate), whereas teens crashed more (47% crash rate). Seniors had the highest crash rate (50% crash rate). Males (38% crash rate) crashed less than females (43% crash rate). All participants with a reaction time less than 4 s were able to avoid the crash. The results from the simulation drives show that humans lose focus when they do not actively drive so that their response in an emergency does not allow them to reclaim control quickly enough to avoid a crash.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨年龄和性别如何影响自动驾驶车辆中应对紧急情况的能力。为此,本研究招募了 60 名不同年龄组(青少年:16-19 岁,占 32%;成年人:35-54 岁,占 37%;老年人:65 岁以上,占 32%)的司机(男性:48%,女性:52%),分享他们对自动驾驶技术的看法。他们被邀请乘坐驾驶模拟器,模拟自动驾驶模式下的车辆(纵向和横向控制)。在一个自动驾驶车辆意外驶向关闭的高速公路出口的场景中,21%的司机没有做出任何反应。对于这个事件,司机有 6.2 秒的时间来避免碰撞,40%的司机发生了碰撞。35-54 岁的成年人比其他年龄组(33%的碰撞率)的碰撞率更低,而青少年的碰撞率更高(47%的碰撞率)。老年人的碰撞率最高(50%的碰撞率)。男性(38%的碰撞率)的碰撞率低于女性(43%的碰撞率)。所有反应时间少于 4 秒的参与者都能够避免碰撞。模拟驾驶的结果表明,当人类不主动驾驶时,他们会失去注意力,因此在紧急情况下的反应速度不够快,无法及时夺回控制权以避免碰撞。

相似文献

1
Age and gender differences in emergency takeover from automated to manual driving on simulator.在模拟器上从自动驾驶到手动驾驶的紧急接管中年龄和性别差异。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup2):S163-S165. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1661677. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
2
Analysis of near crashes among teen, young adult, and experienced adult drivers using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study.利用SHRP2自然驾驶研究对青少年、年轻成年人和经验丰富的成年驾驶员中的险些相撞事故进行分析。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 Feb 28;19(sup1):S89-S96. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1415433.
3
Advanced driver assistance systems for teen drivers: Teen and parent impressions, perceived need, and intervention preferences.针对青少年驾驶员的先进驾驶辅助系统:青少年及家长的印象、感知需求和干预偏好。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 Feb 28;19(sup1):S120-S124. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1401220.
4
Field effectiveness evaluation of advanced driver assistance systems.先进驾驶辅助系统的实地有效性评估
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(sup2):S91-S95. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1527030. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
5
Characteristics of Single Vehicle Crashes with a Teen Driver in South Carolina, 2005-2008.2005-2008 年南卡罗来纳州青少年驾驶员单车事故特征分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jan;122:325-331. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
6
The impact of sleep disorders on driving safety-findings from the Second Strategic Highway Research Program naturalistic driving study.睡眠障碍对驾驶安全的影响——来自第二战略公路研究计划自然驾驶研究的发现。
Sleep. 2018 Apr 1;41(4). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsy023.
7
Comparison of teen and adult driver crash scenarios in a nationally representative sample of serious crashes.在全国具有代表性的严重撞车事故样本中,青少年与成年驾驶员撞车场景的比较。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Nov;72:302-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.016. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
8
Age-related differences in fatal intersection crashes in the United States.美国致命交叉路口撞车事故中的年龄差异。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Feb;99(Pt A):20-29. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.10.030. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
9
Comparison of crash rates and rear-end striking crashes among novice teens and experienced adults using the SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study.利用SHRP2自然驾驶研究比较新手青少年和有经验的成年人的撞车率及追尾碰撞事故。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Sep;17 Suppl 1:48-52. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1188384.
10
Determining the validity of the AMA guide: A historical cohort analysis of the assessment of driving related skills and crash rate among older drivers.确定 AMA 指南的有效性:一项针对老年司机驾驶相关技能评估和事故率的历史队列分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Dec;61:311-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.03.020. Epub 2013 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of women's experiences and barriers in automated vehicle research.对女性在自动驾驶汽车研究中的经历与障碍的范围综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 10;20(9):e0331402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331402. eCollection 2025.
2
Exploring the impact of display types of information about autonomous driving in semi-autonomous vehicles on drivers' situation awareness and take-over performance under different driving scenarios.探索半自动驾驶车辆中自动驾驶信息显示类型在不同驾驶场景下对驾驶员态势感知和接管性能的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 22;20(8):e0329760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329760. eCollection 2025.
3
Willingness to take responsibility: Self-sacrifice versus sacrificing others in takeover decisions during autonomous driving.
承担责任的意愿:自动驾驶过程中接管决策中的自我牺牲与牺牲他人。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 16;10(9):e29616. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29616. eCollection 2024 May 15.
4
The effect of a startle-based warning, age, sex, and secondary task on takeover actions in critical autonomous driving scenarios.基于惊吓的警告、年龄、性别和次要任务对关键自动驾驶场景中接管行为的影响。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Mar 27;11:1147606. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1147606. eCollection 2023.
5
Analyzing the Influencing Factors and Workload Variation of Takeover Behavior in Semi-Autonomous Vehicles.分析半自动驾驶汽车接管行为的影响因素及工作负荷变化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 6;19(3):1834. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031834.