• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

已诊断痴呆症的患病率及决定因素:一项登记关联研究——将基于人群的HUNT研究中的痴呆症诊断与挪威初级保健机构和医院的痴呆症登记诊断相联系

Prevalence and Determinants of Diagnosed Dementia: A Registry Linkage Study Linking Diagnosis of Dementia in the Population-Based HUNT Study to Registry Diagnosis of Dementia in Primary Care and Hospitals in Norway.

作者信息

Gjøra Linda, Strand Bjørn Heine, Bergh Sverre, Bosnes Ingunn, Johannessen Aud, Livingston Gill, Skjellegrind Håvard Kjesbu, Selbæk Geir

机构信息

The Norwegian National Centre for Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.

Department of Psychiatry, Levanger Hospital, Nord-Trøndelag Hospital Trust, Levanger, Norway.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;99(1):363-375. doi: 10.3233/JAD-240037.

DOI:10.3233/JAD-240037
PMID:38701153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11091616/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A timely diagnosis of dementia can be beneficial for providing good support, treatment, and care, but the diagnostic rate remains unknown and is probably low.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the dementia diagnostic rate and to describe factors associated with diagnosed dementia.

METHODS

This registry linkage study linked information on research-based study diagnoses of all-cause dementia and subtypes of dementias, Alzheimer's disease, and related dementias, in 1,525 participants from a cross-sectional population-based study (HUNT4 70+) to dementia registry diagnoses in both primary-care and hospital registries. Factors associated with dementia were analyzed with multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among those with research-based dementia study diagnoses in HUNT4 70+, 35.6% had a dementia registry diagnosis in the health registries. The diagnostic rate in registry diagnoses was 19.8% among home-dwellers and 66.0% among nursing home residents. Of those with a study diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, 35.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 32.6-39.0) had a registry diagnosis; for those with a study diagnosis of vascular dementia, the rate was 25.8% (95% CI 19.2-33.3) and for Lewy body dementias and frontotemporal dementia, the diagnosis rate was 63.0% (95% CI 48.7-75.7) and 60.0% (95% CI 43.3-75.1), respectively. Factors associated with having a registry diagnosis included dementia in the family, not being in the youngest or oldest age group, higher education, more severe cognitive decline, and greater need for help with activities of daily living.

CONCLUSIONS

Undiagnosed dementia is common, as only one-third of those with dementia are diagnosed. Diagnoses appear to be made at a late stage of dementia.

摘要

背景

及时诊断痴呆症有助于提供良好的支持、治疗和护理,但诊断率仍然未知且可能较低。

目的

确定痴呆症诊断率并描述与确诊痴呆症相关的因素。

方法

这项登记链接研究将基于研究的全因痴呆症及痴呆症亚型、阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症的诊断信息,从一项基于人群的横断面研究(HUNT4 70+)中的1525名参与者,与初级保健和医院登记处的痴呆症登记诊断信息进行了链接。使用多元逻辑回归分析与痴呆症相关的因素。

结果

在HUNT4 70+中基于研究诊断为痴呆症的人群中,35.6%在健康登记处有痴呆症登记诊断。登记诊断在家居者中的诊断率为19.8%,在养老院居民中为66.0%。在研究诊断为阿尔茨海默病的人群中,35.8%(95%置信区间(CI)32.6 - 39.0)有登记诊断;研究诊断为血管性痴呆的人群中,这一比例为25.8%(95% CI 19.2 - 33.3),路易体痴呆和额颞叶痴呆的诊断率分别为63.0%(95% CI 48.7 - 75.7)和60.0%(95% CI 43.3 - 75.1)。与有登记诊断相关的因素包括家族中有痴呆症、不在最年轻或最年长年龄组、高等教育、更严重的认知衰退以及在日常生活活动中更需要帮助。

结论

未诊断出的痴呆症很常见,因为只有三分之一的痴呆症患者被诊断出来。诊断似乎是在痴呆症的晚期进行的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96cc/11091616/6d43abfaa082/jad-99-jad240037-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96cc/11091616/32681bece5ce/jad-99-jad240037-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96cc/11091616/6d43abfaa082/jad-99-jad240037-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96cc/11091616/32681bece5ce/jad-99-jad240037-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96cc/11091616/6d43abfaa082/jad-99-jad240037-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Prevalence and Determinants of Diagnosed Dementia: A Registry Linkage Study Linking Diagnosis of Dementia in the Population-Based HUNT Study to Registry Diagnosis of Dementia in Primary Care and Hospitals in Norway.已诊断痴呆症的患病率及决定因素:一项登记关联研究——将基于人群的HUNT研究中的痴呆症诊断与挪威初级保健机构和医院的痴呆症登记诊断相联系
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;99(1):363-375. doi: 10.3233/JAD-240037.
2
Survival and years of life lost in various aetiologies of dementia, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and subjective cognitive decline (SCD) in Norway.挪威各种病因导致的痴呆、轻度认知障碍(MCI)和主观认知下降(SCD)患者的生存和寿命损失情况。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 21;13(9):e0204436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204436. eCollection 2018.
3
Current and Future Prevalence Estimates of Mild Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, and Its Subtypes in a Population-Based Sample of People 70 Years and Older in Norway: The HUNT Study.挪威基于人群的 70 岁及以上人群中轻度认知障碍、痴呆及其亚型的当前和未来流行率估计:HUNT 研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;79(3):1213-1226. doi: 10.3233/JAD-201275.
4
Diagnosis of Dementia in the Specialist Setting: A Comparison Between the Swedish Dementia Registry (SveDem) and the Registry of Dementias of Girona (ReDeGi).专科环境下痴呆症的诊断:瑞典痴呆症登记处(SveDem)与赫罗纳痴呆症登记处(ReDeGi)的比较
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Jul 1;53(4):1341-51. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160098.
5
6
The Tuscany experimental registry for Alzheimer's disease and other dementias: how many demented people does it capture?托斯卡纳阿尔茨海默病及其他痴呆症实验登记处:它涵盖了多少痴呆患者?
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2007 Oct;19(5):390-3. doi: 10.1007/BF03324719.
7
[Differences among dementias according to onset age: study based on dementia registry data].[根据发病年龄划分的痴呆症差异:基于痴呆症登记数据的研究]
Neurologia. 2008 Apr;23(3):145-51.
8
Challenges in surveillance of dementias in New York State.纽约州痴呆症监测面临的挑战。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2004 Jan;1(1):A08. Epub 2003 Dec 15.
9
Association between blood pressure and Alzheimer disease measured up to 27 years prior to diagnosis: the HUNT Study.诊断前长达27年的血压与阿尔茨海默病之间的关联:HUNT研究。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2017 May 31;9(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13195-017-0262-x.
10
Mortality risk after dementia diagnosis by dementia type and underlying factors: a cohort of 15,209 patients based on the Swedish Dementia Registry.根据痴呆类型和潜在因素诊断痴呆后的死亡风险:基于瑞典痴呆症登记处的15209名患者队列研究
J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;41(2):467-77. doi: 10.3233/JAD-131856.

引用本文的文献

1
Web-Based Assessment of Cognition and Dementia Risk Factors in Over 3000 Norwegian Adults Aged 50 Years and Older: Cross-Sectional PROTECT Norge Study.基于网络对3000多名50岁及以上挪威成年人认知及痴呆风险因素的评估:横断面PROTECT挪威研究
JMIR Aging. 2025 Aug 25;8:e69867. doi: 10.2196/69867.
2
Change over time in characteristics and survival of residents newly admitted to nursing homes: an analysis of health insurance claims data from 2011 to 2020 in Germany.养老院新入住居民特征及生存情况随时间的变化:对德国2011年至2020年医疗保险理赔数据的分析
Eur J Ageing. 2025 Jul 21;22(1):34. doi: 10.1007/s10433-025-00871-z.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Disease-specific health spending by age, sex, and type of care in Norway: a national health registry study.挪威按年龄、性别和护理类型划分的特定疾病卫生支出:一项国家健康登记研究。
BMC Med. 2023 Jun 6;21(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02896-6.
2
Dementia prevention in memory clinics: recommendations from the European task force for brain health services.记忆门诊中的痴呆症预防:欧洲脑健康服务特别工作组的建议
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Jan 31;26:100576. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100576. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Cohort Profile Update: The HUNT Study, Norway.
A head-to-head comparison of the validity and predictive ability for health outcomes of diagnosis versus medication-based comorbidity indices.
基于诊断与药物治疗的共病指数对健康结局的有效性和预测能力的直接比较。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 May 27;37(1):172. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-03073-w.
4
Focus groups on digital cognitive assessment in the context of Alzheimer's disease.关于阿尔茨海默病背景下数字认知评估的焦点小组讨论。
Digit Health. 2025 Feb 12;11:20552076251318903. doi: 10.1177/20552076251318903. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
Comparing Different Implementation Strategies for Collaborative Dementia Care Management in Terms of Patients' Characteristics, Unmet Needs, and the Impact on Quality of Life and Costs in Germany.从患者特征、未满足的需求以及对德国生活质量和成本的影响方面比较协作性痴呆症护理管理的不同实施策略。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2025 Mar;9(2):271-282. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00548-w. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
6
Outcomes of different anesthesia techniques in nonagenarians treated with mechanical thrombectomy for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion: An inverse probability weighting analysis.机械取栓治疗前循环大血管闭塞的非agenarians不同麻醉技术的结果:逆概率加权分析。 注:这里“nonagenarians”可能有误,正常应该是“nonagenarian”,意思是“九十多岁的人” 。正确译文为:九十多岁患者接受机械取栓治疗前循环大血管闭塞时不同麻醉技术的结果:逆概率加权分析。
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Oct 30:23969873241293009. doi: 10.1177/23969873241293009.
队列简介更新:挪威HUNT研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Feb 8;52(1):e80-e91. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac095.
4
Combining education and income into a socioeconomic position score for use in studies of health inequalities.将教育和收入结合为一个社会经济地位评分,用于研究健康不平等问题。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 13;22(1):969. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13366-8.
5
Characteristics of people living with undiagnosed dementia: findings from the CFAS Wales study.未确诊痴呆症患者的特征:威尔士认知功能障碍综合评估研究的结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 May 10;22(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03086-4.
6
Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.2019 年全球痴呆症患病率估计及 2050 年预测患病率:2019 年全球疾病负担研究分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Feb;7(2):e105-e125. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00249-8. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
7
Time to Diagnosis in Young Onset Alzheimer's Disease: A Population-Based Study from Central Norway.早发性阿尔茨海默病的诊断时间:来自挪威中部的一项基于人群的研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;82(3):965-974. doi: 10.3233/JAD-210090.
8
Association of Socioeconomic Status With Dementia Diagnosis Among Older Adults in Denmark.丹麦老年人社会经济地位与痴呆诊断的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2110432. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10432.
9
Current and Future Prevalence Estimates of Mild Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, and Its Subtypes in a Population-Based Sample of People 70 Years and Older in Norway: The HUNT Study.挪威基于人群的 70 岁及以上人群中轻度认知障碍、痴呆及其亚型的当前和未来流行率估计:HUNT 研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;79(3):1213-1226. doi: 10.3233/JAD-201275.
10
Time from diagnosis to institutionalization and death in people with dementia.痴呆患者从确诊到住院和死亡的时间。
Alzheimers Dement. 2020 Apr;16(4):662-671. doi: 10.1002/alz.12063. Epub 2020 Feb 18.