Dziruni Tendayi Bruce, Hutchinson Alison M, Coomer Jack, Keppich-Arnold Sandra, Bucknall Tracey
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University Geelong, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Oct;33(5):1493-1531. doi: 10.1111/inm.13347. Epub 2024 May 9.
Mental state deterioration in patients poses significant challenges in healthcare, potentially resulting in adverse outcomes for patients and continued reliance on restrictive interventions. Implementing evidence-based approaches such as a rapid response system that prioritises early identification and intervention can effectively manage adverse outcomes. However, little is known regarding the effectiveness of these interventions. The objective of this synthesis was to test and refine initial programme theories by synthesising evidence to understand what works, for whom and under what circumstances. Based on the realist synthesis methodology, we searched EMBASE, CINAHL, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and grey literature for evidence to inform contexts, mechanisms and outcomes on the functioning of a rapid response model. We identified 28 relevant sources encompassing peer-reviewed journal articles and grey literature. This synthesis identified three important elements that contribute to the effectiveness of a rapid response system for managing mental state deterioration: care processes, therapeutic practices and organisational support. Essential elements include improving confidence and clinical skills through training, timely assessment and intervention, teamwork, communication and the creation of governance structures for monitoring and evaluation. To ensure the effectiveness, an organisation must adopt a comprehensive approach that incorporates organisational support, resource allocation, training, clear communication channels and commitment to continuous quality improvement. However, implementing interventions within a complex healthcare system requires thoughtful consideration of the organisational culture and governance structures. By taking a comprehensive and holistic approach to improvement initiatives, organisations can strive to achieve optimal outcomes in managing mental state deterioration and improving patient care.
患者的精神状态恶化给医疗保健带来了重大挑战,可能给患者带来不良后果,并持续依赖限制性干预措施。实施基于证据的方法,如优先考虑早期识别和干预的快速反应系统,可以有效管理不良后果。然而,对于这些干预措施的有效性知之甚少。本综合分析的目的是通过综合证据来检验和完善初始项目理论,以了解什么有效、对谁有效以及在什么情况下有效。基于现实主义综合方法,我们在EMBASE、CINAHL、MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆和灰色文献中搜索证据,以了解快速反应模型运作的背景、机制和结果。我们确定了28个相关来源,包括同行评审的期刊文章和灰色文献。本综合分析确定了有助于快速反应系统有效管理精神状态恶化的三个重要因素:护理流程、治疗实践和组织支持。基本要素包括通过培训提高信心和临床技能、及时评估和干预、团队合作、沟通以及建立监测和评估的治理结构。为确保有效性,组织必须采取综合方法,包括组织支持、资源分配、培训、明确的沟通渠道以及对持续质量改进的承诺。然而,在复杂的医疗保健系统中实施干预措施需要认真考虑组织文化和治理结构。通过对改进举措采取全面和整体的方法,组织可以努力在管理精神状态恶化和改善患者护理方面取得最佳结果。