• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种重新设计和简化评估计划并量化影响的方法。在默克方案中的应用。

A Method to Redesign and Simplify Schedules of Assessment and Quantify the Impacts. Applications to Merck Protocols.

机构信息

San Francisco Coordinating Center, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, Mission Hall: 550-16th Street, 2nd Floor, 94143, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, Mission Hall: Box #0560 550- 16th Street, 2nd Floor, 94143, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Sep;58(5):789-795. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00666-x. Epub 2024 May 10.

DOI:10.1007/s43441-024-00666-x
PMID:38727892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11335779/
Abstract

The growing complexity of biopharmaceutical sponsored trials has adverse impacts on increased burdens on participants, clinical sites, and sponsors, including greater difficulty recruiting and retaining participants, difficulty engaging sites to participate in trials, excessive cost of trials, and increased cycle times. The schedule of assessments (SoAs) is the origin of and blueprint for complexity that is often generated by copying and pasting from previous SoAs. We developed an approach, termed Lean Design, for redesigning the assessments in SoAs that generate data, the 'Data SoA.' It starts with a simple "ground zero" SoA. Any addition is challenged using several principles of trial design. We employed a system, the Faro Trial Designer Tool, to quantify the impacts of changes in an SoA to provide real-time feedback to the team and sponsor. We applied the approach in workshops with teams for six clinical trials in various stages of design and implementation. The approach resulted in recommendation for substantial potential savings in participant and site staff time, costs, and complexity of the trials. Application of this approach to very early stages of protocol design has the potential to reduce the complexity of biopharmaceutical sponsored trials and its consequences.

摘要

生物制药赞助试验的日益复杂性对参与者、临床机构和赞助商造成了不利影响,包括招募和留住参与者的难度增加、机构参与试验的难度增加、试验成本过高以及周期延长。评估计划(SoA)是复杂性的起源和蓝图,而这种复杂性往往是通过从以前的 SoA 中复制和粘贴生成的。我们开发了一种方法,称为精益设计,用于重新设计生成数据的评估计划,即“数据 SoA”。它从一个简单的“零起点”SoA 开始。任何添加内容都将使用几个试验设计原则进行挑战。我们使用了一个名为 Faro 试验设计器工具的系统来量化 SoA 变更对团队和赞助商的实时反馈。我们在设计和实施的不同阶段的六个临床试验的团队研讨会上应用了该方法。该方法建议在参与者和现场工作人员的时间、成本和试验的复杂性方面进行大幅度的潜在节省。在方案设计的早期阶段应用这种方法有可能降低生物制药赞助试验的复杂性及其后果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2648/11335779/8bdff3bdded5/43441_2024_666_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2648/11335779/8bdff3bdded5/43441_2024_666_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2648/11335779/8bdff3bdded5/43441_2024_666_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A Method to Redesign and Simplify Schedules of Assessment and Quantify the Impacts. Applications to Merck Protocols.一种重新设计和简化评估计划并量化影响的方法。在默克方案中的应用。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Sep;58(5):789-795. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00666-x. Epub 2024 May 10.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Interventions for preventing falls in older people in care facilities.护理机构中预防老年人跌倒的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 20;8:CD016064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016064.
4
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
5
MarkVCID cerebral small vessel consortium: I. Enrollment, clinical, fluid protocols.马克 VCID 脑小血管联盟:一、入组、临床、液体方案。
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Apr;17(4):704-715. doi: 10.1002/alz.12215. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
6
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
Silicone gel sheeting for treating hypertrophic scars.硅凝胶片治疗增生性瘢痕。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 26;9(9):CD013357. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013357.pub2.
9
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
10
Individual-level interventions to reduce personal exposure to outdoor air pollution and their effects on people with long-term respiratory conditions.个体层面的干预措施以减少个人接触室外空气污染及其对长期呼吸系统疾病患者的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 9;8(8):CD013441. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013441.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Computational approaches for toxicology and Pharmacokinetic properties prediction.毒理学和药代动力学性质预测的计算方法。
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2025 Sep 4;52(5):51. doi: 10.1007/s10928-025-09999-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence Applied to clinical trials: opportunities and challenges.人工智能应用于临床试验:机遇与挑战。
Health Technol (Berl). 2023;13(2):203-213. doi: 10.1007/s12553-023-00738-2. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
2
Scoping review of the current landscape of AI-based applications in clinical trials.基于 AI 的应用在临床试验中应用现状的范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 12;10:949377. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.949377. eCollection 2022.
3
Variation in the estimated costs of pivotal clinical benefit trials supporting the US approval of new therapeutic agents, 2015-2017: a cross-sectional study.
2015-2017 年:支持美国批准新治疗药物的关键临床获益试验估计成本的变化:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 11;10(6):e038863. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038863.
4
Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Trial Design.人工智能在临床试验设计中的应用。
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2019 Aug;40(8):577-591. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
5
Estimated Costs of Pivotal Trials for Novel Therapeutic Agents Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, 2015-2016.2015-2016 年美国食品和药物管理局批准的新型治疗药物关键性试验的预估成本。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Nov 1;178(11):1451-1457. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3931.
6
How much do clinical trials cost?临床试验的成本是多少?
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017 Jun;16(6):381-382. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.70. Epub 2017 May 19.
7
Trial watch: Trends in clinical trial design complexity.试验观察:临床试验设计复杂性的趋势
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017 May;16(5):307. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.65. Epub 2017 Apr 18.