• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Design and psychometric evaluation of the collaborative coping with infertility questionnaire in candidate of assisted reproductive techniques.辅助生殖技术候选者协作应对不孕问卷的设计及心理计量学评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 11;14(1):10804. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61607-0.
2
Psychometric properties of revised version of the fertility adjustment scale in infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology.改良版生育调整量表在接受辅助生殖技术的不孕夫妇中的心理测量特性。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Dec;243:16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.10.006. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
3
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Copenhagen Multi-Centre Psychosocial Infertility-Fertility Problem Stress Scales.《哥本哈根多中心心理社会不孕-生育问题应激量表中文版的信度和效度》。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2024 Oct;30(5):e13219. doi: 10.1111/ijn.13219. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
4
Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the FertiQoL measure in couples undergoing infertility treatment.西班牙语版 FertiQoL 量表在接受不孕治疗的夫妇中的心理测量特性。
J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2024 Sep;42(5):827-841. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2023.2180623. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
5
Factor Analysis of the Persian Version of the Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire.嗓音残疾应对问卷波斯语版本的因子分析
J Voice. 2020 Nov;34(6):965.e1-965.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
6
Effectiveness of a mixed lifestyle program in couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology: a study protocol.辅助生殖技术治疗中夫妇混合生活方式方案的有效性:研究方案。
Reprod Health. 2023 Aug 1;20(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01652-6.
7
The relations between marital quality, social support, social acceptance and coping strategies among the infertile Iranian couples.伊朗不孕夫妇的婚姻质量、社会支持、社会接纳与应对策略之间的关系。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 May;200:58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.02.034. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
8
Comparison of three infertility-specific measures in men and women going through assisted reproductive technology treatment.比较三种在接受辅助生殖技术治疗的男性和女性中特定于不孕的措施。
J Health Psychol. 2019 May;24(6):738-749. doi: 10.1177/1359105316678669. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
9
Measuring self-efficacy to deal with infertility: Psychometric properties and confirmatory factor analysis of the Portuguese version of the infertility self-efficacy scale.测量应对不孕的自我效能:葡萄牙版不孕自我效能量表的心理测量特性和验证性因素分析。
Res Nurs Health. 2013 Feb;36(1):65-74. doi: 10.1002/nur.21516. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
10
Design and psychometric properties of a questionnaire for assessing sexual and reproductive health needs of married adolescent women: an exploratory sequential mixed methods study.一份用于评估已婚青春期女性性与生殖健康需求的问卷的设计及心理测量特性:一项探索性序贯混合方法研究
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Oct;42(7):3172-3180. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2109132. Epub 2022 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationships between couple collaboration, well-being, and psychological health of infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive treatment.接受辅助生殖治疗的不孕夫妇中夫妇协作、幸福感和心理健康之间的关系。
Reprod Health. 2024 Aug 16;21(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01857-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Infertility-related stress, social support, and coping of women experiencing infertility in Vietnam.越南不孕女性的不孕相关压力、社会支持及应对方式
Health Psychol Rep. 2022 Feb 22;10(2):129-138. doi: 10.5114/hpr.2022.113437. eCollection 2022.
2
Coping, social support and medical factors on psychosocial impact in couples experiencing infertility.应对方式、社会支持及医学因素对不孕夫妇心理社会影响的作用。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2024;50(2):197-215. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2023.2269983. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
3
The effect of stigma on level of ınfertility-related psychological distress in women with infertility.耻辱感对不孕女性与不孕相关心理困扰程度的影响。
Afr J Reprod Health. 2022 Feb;26(2):13-25. doi: 10.29063/ajrh2022/v26i2.2.
4
Establishing appropriate sample size for developing and validating a questionnaire in nursing research.在护理研究中确定用于开发和验证问卷的合适样本量。
Belitung Nurs J. 2021 Oct 28;7(5):356-360. doi: 10.33546/bnj.1927. eCollection 2021.
5
Spouse's coping strategies mediate the relationship between women's coping strategies and their psychological health among infertile couples.配偶的应对策略在女性应对策略与不孕夫妇心理健康之间起中介作用。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 1;13(1):10675. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37380-x.
6
Assisted Reproductive Treatments, Quality of Life, and Alexithymia in Couples.夫妻的辅助生殖治疗、生活质量与述情障碍
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 4;11(7):1026. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11071026.
7
Lived experiences and coping strategies of persons seeking infertility treatment in the Kumasi metropolis: a descriptive phenomenological study.寻求不孕治疗的人在库马西大都市的生活经历和应对策略:一项描述性现象学研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Feb 20;23(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02194-6.
8
Does prevalence of sexual dysfunction differ among the most common causes of infertility? A cross-sectional study.性功能障碍的患病率在最常见的不孕原因中是否存在差异?一项横断面研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Apr 27;22(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01708-y.
9
Perceived Partner's Self-Control and Social Support Effects on Relationship Satisfaction in Couples Experiencing Infertility or Miscarriage: Dyadic Analyses.在经历不孕或流产的夫妇中,感知伴侣的自我控制和社会支持对关系满意度的影响:对偶分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 10;19(4):1970. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19041970.
10
Infertility-related stress: A concept analysis.不孕相关压力:一项概念分析
Nurs Forum. 2022 May;57(3):437-445. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12683. Epub 2021 Dec 6.

辅助生殖技术候选者协作应对不孕问卷的设计及心理计量学评估。

Design and psychometric evaluation of the collaborative coping with infertility questionnaire in candidate of assisted reproductive techniques.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.

Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Reproductive Health Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 May 11;14(1):10804. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61607-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-61607-0
PMID:38734723
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11088645/
Abstract

Evaluating couples' coping with infertility and its impact on their mental health is valuable in designing supportive programs. Since infertility is a shared problem in married life, coping with it requires collaborative coping strategies. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to design and psychometrically evaluate the collaborative coping with infertility questionnaire (CCIQ) in candidates of assisted reproductive techniques (ART). The exploratory factor analysis of a 27-item questionnaire designed based on the Likert scale in the Persian language was evaluated through the principal component analysis method in a cross-sectional study conducted on 200 couples who volunteered for ART. The cut-off point of factor loadings was considered 0.4. Furthermore, the criterion validity of the questionnaire was evaluated using a 12-item revised Fertility Adjustment Scale (R-FAS) and its relationship with the score of the CCIQ. Moreover, the internal consistency of the questionnaire was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha correlation coefficient. In the exploratory factor analysis, 20 items with a factor loading above 0.4 were extracted under three factors. The three extracted factors with a value above one explained 43.78% of the variance of CCIQ. The factor loading of the accepted items ranged between 0.402 and 0.691. External reliability was confirmed with Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.98. The relationship between CCIQ and R-FAS score was significant (p < 0.0001). The results of the study showed that the 20-item CCIQ enjoyed acceptable validity and reliability in the three dimensions of 'dynamic interaction,' 'reorganizing married life goals,' and 'perception about infertility,' which can be used to evaluate collaborative coping with infertility questionnaire in ART candidates.

摘要

评估夫妇应对不孕不育及其对心理健康的影响对于设计支持性计划很有价值。由于不孕不育是已婚生活中的共同问题,因此应对它需要协作应对策略。因此,本研究的目的是设计并心理测量评估辅助生殖技术(ART)候选者的协作应对不孕不育问卷(CCIQ)。在一项横断面研究中,通过主成分分析方法评估了基于波斯语李克特量表设计的 27 项问卷的探索性因子分析,该研究招募了 200 对自愿接受 ART 的夫妇。因子负荷的截止值被认为是 0.4。此外,还使用修订后的生育调整量表(R-FAS)的 12 项和与 CCIQ 评分的关系评估了问卷的标准有效性。此外,还使用 Cronbach 的 alpha 相关系数评估了问卷的内部一致性。在探索性因子分析中,在三个因素下提取了 20 个因子负荷大于 0.4 的项目。三个提取因子的价值大于一,解释了 CCIQ 变异的 43.78%。接受项目的因子负荷范围在 0.402 到 0.691 之间。通过 Cronbach 的 alpha 系数 0.98 验证了外部可靠性。CCIQ 与 R-FAS 评分之间的关系具有统计学意义(p<0.0001)。研究结果表明,20 项 CCIQ 在“动态互动”、“重新组织婚姻生活目标”和“对不孕不育的认知”三个维度上具有可接受的有效性和可靠性,可用于评估 ART 候选者的协作应对不孕不育问卷。