Lajevardi Nazita, Oskooii Kassra A R, Walker Hannah
Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.
University of Delaware, Newark, USA.
J Public Policy. 2022 Dec;42(4):656-683. doi: 10.1017/s0143814x22000083. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
Research finds that social media platforms' peer-to-peer structures shape the public discourse and increase citizens' likelihood of exposure to unregulated, false, and prejudicial content. Here, we test whether self-reported reliance on social media as a primary news source is linked to racialised policy support, taking the case of United States Muslims, a publicly visible but understudied group about whom significant false and prejudicial content is abundant on these platforms. Drawing on three original surveys and the Nationscape dataset, we find a strong and consistent association between reliance on social media and support for a range of anti-Muslim policies. Importantly, reliance on social media is linked to policy attitudes across the partisan divide and for individuals who reported holding positive or negative feelings towards Muslims. These findings highlight the need for further investigation into the political ramification of information presented on contemporary social media outlets, particularly information related to stigmatised groups.
研究发现,社交媒体平台的对等结构塑造了公共话语,并增加了公民接触不受监管、虚假和偏见性内容的可能性。在此,我们以美国穆斯林为例,测试将社交媒体作为主要新闻来源的自我报告依赖是否与种族化的政策支持相关联。美国穆斯林是一个在公众视野中但研究不足的群体,在这些平台上充斥着大量关于他们的虚假和偏见性内容。基于三项原创调查和国家景观数据集,我们发现对社交媒体的依赖与对一系列反穆斯林政策的支持之间存在强烈且一致的关联。重要的是,对社交媒体的依赖与跨党派分歧的政策态度相关联,对于那些报告对穆斯林持有积极或消极情绪的个人也是如此。这些发现凸显了进一步调查当代社交媒体上所呈现信息的政治影响的必要性,特别是与被污名化群体相关的信息。