• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

斜视等眼科疾病患儿的点状视力筛查仪重测

Test-Retest of the Spot Vision Screener among Children with Ophthalmological Diseases including Strabismus.

作者信息

Ichimura Mika, Ueki Satoshi, Fukuchi Takeo

机构信息

Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.

出版信息

J Ophthalmol. 2024 May 6;2024:2173860. doi: 10.1155/2024/2173860. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1155/2024/2173860
PMID:38741691
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11090673/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The spot vision screener (SVS) has been widely used for eye health examinations of infants and young children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of two SVS measurements in children with ophthalmological diseases.

METHODS

29 patients aged 15 years or younger who visited our hospital for refraction examinations with SVS before and at least 60 minutes after administration of 2 drops of 1% cyclopentolate ophthalmic solution (before and after cycloplegia) were included in this study. Two SVS measurements were made before and after cycloplegia, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman analysis for spherical, spherical equivalent (SE), cylindrical, J0, and J45 values before and after cycloplegia were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age ± standard deviation (SD) of the 29 patients was 7.6 ± 2.4 years. There were 11 males and 18 females. The mean spherical values based on the SVS before and after cycloplegia were 0.42 ± 1.67 diopter (D), and 1.47 ± 2.23 D for the first measurement and 0.60 ± 1.74 D, and 1.42 ± 2.27 D for the second measurement, respectively. The mean cylindrical values based on SVS before and after cycloplegia were -1.45 ± 0.96 D and -1.65 ± 0.89 D for the first measurement and -1.58 ± 1.13 D and -1.66 ± 0.91 D for the second measurement, respectively. The ICCs for the first and second spherical, SE, cylindrical, J0, and J45 values before cycloplegia were 0.95, 0.98, 0.83, 0.86, and 0.86, respectively. The ICCs for the first and second spherical, SE, cylindrical, J0, and J45 values after cycloplegia were 0.99, 0.99, 0,87, 0.73, and 0.80, respectively. The Bland-Altman analysis of the first and second spherical and SE values before cycloplegia showed fan-shaped variation as hyperopia increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Two consecutive SVS refraction measurements have a high degree of reproducibility for spherical and SE values but a low degree for cylindrical, J0, and J45 values. From these results, multiple measurements are required to obtain reliable results for cylindrical values.

摘要

背景

点状视力筛查仪(SVS)已广泛用于婴幼儿的眼部健康检查。本研究的目的是评估在患有眼科疾病的儿童中两次SVS测量的可重复性。

方法

本研究纳入了29例15岁及以下的患者,这些患者在我院使用SVS进行验光检查,在滴入2滴1%环喷托酯滴眼液之前(散瞳前)和至少60分钟后(散瞳后)分别进行了两次SVS测量。分别在散瞳前后进行两次SVS测量。分析了散瞳前后球镜、等效球镜(SE)、柱镜、J0和J45值的组内相关系数(ICC)和Bland-Altman分析。

结果

29例患者的平均年龄±标准差(SD)为7.6±2.4岁。男性11例,女性18例。基于SVS的散瞳前和散瞳后第一次测量的平均球镜值分别为0.42±1.67屈光度(D)和1.47±2.23 D,第二次测量分别为0.60±1.74 D和1.42±2.27 D。基于SVS的散瞳前和散瞳后第一次测量的平均柱镜值分别为-1.45±0.96 D和-1.65±0.89 D,第二次测量分别为-1.58±1.13 D和-1.66±0.91 D。散瞳前第一次和第二次球镜、SE、柱镜、J0和J45值的ICC分别为0.95、0.98、0.83、0.86和0.86。散瞳后第一次和第二次球镜、SE、柱镜、J0和J45值的ICC分别为0.99、0.99、0.87、0.73和0.80。散瞳前第一次和第二次球镜及SE值的Bland-Altman分析显示,随着远视度数增加呈扇形变化。

结论

连续两次SVS验光测量对于球镜和SE值具有高度可重复性,但对于柱镜、J0和J45值可重复性较低。根据这些结果,对于柱镜值需要进行多次测量以获得可靠结果。

相似文献

1
Test-Retest of the Spot Vision Screener among Children with Ophthalmological Diseases including Strabismus.斜视等眼科疾病患儿的点状视力筛查仪重测
J Ophthalmol. 2024 May 6;2024:2173860. doi: 10.1155/2024/2173860. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison of Spot Vision Screener and Tabletop Autorefractometer with Retinoscopy in the Pediatric Population.小儿群体中Spot视力筛查仪和桌面式自动验光仪与视网膜检影法的比较
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr 19;54(2):56-62. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2024.93607.
3
Clinical evaluation of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in Chinese school-aged children: a cross-sectional study.中国学龄儿童散瞳与不散瞳状态下自动验光与主观验光的临床评估:一项横断面研究
Transl Pediatr. 2022 Jun;11(6):933-946. doi: 10.21037/tp-22-226.
4
Does astigmatism alter with cycloplegia?散光在睫状肌麻痹状态下会发生改变吗?
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun 24;28(3):131-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2016.05.003. eCollection 2016 Sep.
5
Spot Refractive Screening With or Without Maximum Atropine Cycloplegia in Preschool Chinese Children.学龄前中国儿童的点瞳折射筛查(伴或不伴最大阿托品睫状肌麻痹)。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2021 May-Jun;58(3):146-153. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20210128-01. Epub 2021 May 1.
6
Measurement Accuracy When Using Spot Vision Screener With or Without Cycloplegia in Young Adults.在年轻成年人中使用点视力筛查仪时有无睫状肌麻痹的测量准确性。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov 21;17:3543-3548. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S431202. eCollection 2023.
7
Accuracy of Photorefraction and Wavefront-Based Autorefraction in Children Under 3 Years of Age.3岁以下儿童的摄影验光和基于波前的自动验光的准确性。
Beyoglu Eye J. 2021 Feb 13;6(1):54-61. doi: 10.14744/bej.2021.09825. eCollection 2021.
8
Comparing School-Aged Refraction Measurements Using the 2WIN-S Portable Refractor in Relation to Cycloplegic Retinoscopy: A Cross-Sectional Study.使用2WIN-S便携式验光仪与睫状肌麻痹视网膜检影法比较学龄儿童的屈光测量:一项横断面研究。
J Ophthalmol. 2021 May 21;2021:6612476. doi: 10.1155/2021/6612476. eCollection 2021.
9
Effect of cycloplegia on the measurement of refractive error in Chinese children.睫状肌麻痹对中国儿童屈光不正测量的影响。
Clin Exp Optom. 2019 Mar;102(2):160-165. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12829. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
10
Overestimation of hyperopia with autorefraction compared with retinoscopy under cycloplegia in school-age children.睫状肌麻痹下自动验光与视网膜检影相比高估了学龄儿童远视。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec;102(12):1717-1722. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311594. Epub 2018 Feb 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Photorefraction with Spot Vision Screener versus Visual Acuity Testing as Community-Based Preschool Vision Screening at the Age of 3.5 Years in Japan.日本社区在 3.5 岁时使用点状视力筛查仪进行光折射与视力测试作为学龄前儿童视力筛查的对比研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 16;19(14):8655. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148655.
2
Instrument Referral Criteria for PlusoptiX, SPOT and 2WIN Targeting 2021 AAPOS Guidelines.针对2021年美国小儿眼科与斜视学会指南的PlusoptiX、SPOT和2WIN仪器转诊标准。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb 25;16:489-505. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S342666. eCollection 2022.
3
A Comparative Study of Two Photoscreening Devices With Manual Vision Screening Involving Preschool Children.
两种照片筛查设备与涉及学龄前儿童的手动视力筛查的比较研究。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2022 Jan-Feb;59(1):46-52. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20210610-01. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
4
Community based vision screening in preschool children; performance of the Spot Vision Screener and optotype testing.社区为基础的学龄前儿童视力筛查;Spot 视力筛查仪和视力表测试的表现。
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2022 Aug;29(4):417-425. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2021.1962918. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
5
Does the Accuracy and Repeatability of Refractive Error Estimates Depend on the Measurement Principle of Autorefractors?自动折射仪的测量原理是否会影响屈光不正估计的准确性和可重复性?
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Jan 5;10(1):2. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.1.2. eCollection 2021 Jan.
6
Comparison of refractive value and pupil size under monocular and binocular conditions between the Spot Vision Screener and binocular open-field autorefractor.单眼和双眼状态下,眼底照相机与双目开放式自动验光仪的屈光值和瞳孔大小比较。
Strabismus. 2020 Dec;28(4):186-193. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2020.1832542. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
7
Clinical Performance of the Spot Vision Photo Screener before and after Induction of Cycloplegia in Children.儿童睫状肌麻痹前后Spot视力筛查仪的临床性能
J Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr 11;2019:5329121. doi: 10.1155/2019/5329121. eCollection 2019.
8
The Repeatability of Values Measured Using the Spot Vision Screener in Healthy Children and Children with Refractive Errors.使用点视力筛查仪测量健康儿童和屈光不正儿童所获数值的可重复性。
J Binocul Vis Ocul Motil. 2019 Apr-Jun;69(2):82-86. doi: 10.1080/2576117X.2019.1618690. Epub 2019 May 22.
9
A Comparison of Three Different Photoscreeners in Children.三种不同儿童视网膜成像筛查仪的比较
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2018 Sep 20;55(5):306-311. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20180405-03. Epub 2018 May 29.
10
Does astigmatism alter with cycloplegia?散光在睫状肌麻痹状态下会发生改变吗?
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun 24;28(3):131-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2016.05.003. eCollection 2016 Sep.