Pokhrel Sushant, Sharma Namrata, Aryal Suraj, Khadka Rachita, Thapa Tika Bahadur, Pandey Pawan, Joshi Govardhan
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Manmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Department of Microbiology, Nobel College, Kathmandu, Nepal.
J Pathog. 2024 May 6;2024:2342468. doi: 10.1155/2024/2342468. eCollection 2024.
The increasing antibiotic resistance and the ability to form biofilms in medical devices have become the leading cause of severe infections associated with (). Since the bacteria living in biofilms can exhibit 10- to 1,000-fold increase in antibiotic resistance and implicate chronic infectious diseases, the detection of ability to form biofilms is of great importance for managing, minimizing, and effectively treating infections caused by it. This study aimed to compare the tube and tissue culture methods to detect biofilm production and antibiotic susceptibility in MRSA and MSSA.
The isolates were identified by the examination of the colony morphology, Gram staining, and various biochemical tests. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of all isolates was performed by the modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method as recommended by CLSI guidelines. MRSA screening was performed phenotypically using a cefoxitin disc (30 g). Isolates were tested for inducible resistance using the D-test, and two phenotypic methods detected biofilm formation.
Among 982 nonrepeated clinical specimens, was isolated from 103 (10.48%). Among 103 clinical isolates of , 54 (52.42%) isolates were MRSA, and 49 (47.57%) were MSSA. Among 54 MRSA isolates, the inducible MLSB phenotype was observed in 23/54 (42.59%) with a positive D-test. By TCP method, 26 (48.1%) MRSA isolates were strong biofilm producers, whereas, among all MSSA isolates, only 6 (12.2%) were strong biofilm producers.
MRSA showed strong biofilm production in comparison with MSSA. The TCP method is a recommended reliable method to detect the biofilm among isolates, and the TM method could be useful for the screening of biofilm production in in the routine clinical laboratory.
抗生素耐药性的不断增加以及在医疗器械中形成生物膜的能力已成为与()相关的严重感染的主要原因。由于生活在生物膜中的细菌对抗生素的耐药性可提高10至1000倍,并与慢性传染病有关,因此检测生物膜形成能力对于管理、最小化和有效治疗由其引起的感染至关重要。本研究旨在比较试管法和组织培养法检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)生物膜产生情况及抗生素敏感性。
通过菌落形态检查、革兰氏染色和各种生化试验鉴定分离株。所有分离株的抗菌药物敏感性试验按照美国临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)指南推荐的改良 Kirby-Bauer 纸片扩散法进行。使用头孢西丁纸片(30 μg)进行MRSA的表型筛选。使用D试验检测分离株的诱导性耐药性,并用两种表型方法检测生物膜形成。
在982份非重复临床标本中,从103份(10.48%)标本中分离出()。在103株临床分离株中,54株(52.42%)为MRSA,49株(47.57%)为MSSA。在54株MRSA分离株中,23/54(42.59%)通过D试验呈阳性,观察到诱导型大环内酯-林可酰胺-链阳菌素B(MLSB)表型。通过试管法(TCP),26株(48.1%)MRSA分离株为强生物膜产生菌,而在所有MSSA分离株中,只有6株(12.2%)为强生物膜产生菌。
与MSSA相比,MRSA表现出更强的生物膜形成能力。试管法是检测()分离株中生物膜的推荐可靠方法,而组织培养法(TM)可用于常规临床实验室中()生物膜形成的筛选。