Xiong Changjun, Zuo Yunzhou, Yan Xiaokang, Wang Guan, Fu Hao, Jiang Xueming
Department of Joint Surgery, Wuhan Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, Wuhan Hubei, 430079, P. R. China.
Department of Joint Surgery, Wuhan Sports University Affiliated Hospital, Wuhan Hubei, 430079, P. R. China.
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 May 15;38(5):576-582. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202401001.
To investigate the accuracy and effectiveness of acetabular cup placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA) after lumbar fusion applying of modified acetabular anteversion and inclination angles test system.
A clinical data of 45 patients undergoing THA for osteoarthritis between January 2018 and June 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. All patients had previously received lumbar fusion. The modified acetabular anteversion and inclination angle test system was used in 26 cases (observation group) and not used in 19 cases (control group) during THA. There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, body mass index, operative side, number of lumbar fusion segments, and preoperative Harris score between the two groups ( >0.05). The position of acetabular prosthesis, hip function (Harris score), and incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.
In the observation group, all acetabular cups were in the safe zone (anteversion angle, 25°-30°) during operation, and 1 acetabular cup (3.85%) was not in the safe zone after operation. In the control group, 9 acetabular cups (47.37%) were not in the safe zone. The postoperative difference between the two groups was significant ( <0.05). There was no significant difference between intra- and post-operative acetabular inclination angles in the observation group ( >0.05), and the postoperative acetabular inclination angle was significantly smaller in the observation group than in the control group ( <0.05). All incisions healed by first intention and no infection occurred. All patients were followed up 6 months. There was no significant difference in Harris score between the two groups at different time point ( >0.05), and there were significant differences between different time points in the two groups ( 0.05). No joint dislocation occurred in the observation group during follow-up, while dislocation occurred in 2 cases and femoral impingement syndrome occurred in 1 case of the control group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups ( >0.05).
For THA patients with lumbar fusion, the ideal placement angle of the acetabular cup can be obtained by using the modified acetabular anteversion and inclination angles test system during operation.
应用改良髋臼前倾角和倾斜角测试系统,探讨腰椎融合术后全髋关节置换术(THA)中髋臼杯置入的准确性和有效性。
回顾性分析2018年1月至2023年6月期间45例行THA治疗骨关节炎患者的临床资料。所有患者此前均接受过腰椎融合术。THA期间,26例患者(观察组)使用改良髋臼前倾角和倾斜角测试系统,19例患者(对照组)未使用。两组患者的性别、年龄、体重指数、手术侧、腰椎融合节段数及术前Harris评分等基线数据比较,差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。比较两组髋臼假体位置、髋关节功能(Harris评分)及并发症发生率。
观察组术中所有髋臼杯均位于安全区(前倾角25°-30°),术后1例髋臼杯(3.85%)不在安全区。对照组9例髋臼杯(47.37%)不在安全区。两组术后差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。观察组术中与术后髋臼倾斜角比较,差异无统计学意义(>0.05),且观察组术后髋臼倾斜角明显小于对照组(<0.05)。所有切口均一期愈合,无感染发生。所有患者均随访6个月。两组不同时间点Harris评分比较,差异无统计学意义(>0.05),两组不同时间点比较,差异有统计学意义(0.05)。随访期间观察组无关节脱位发生,对照组2例发生脱位,1例发生股骨撞击综合征。两组并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。
对于腰椎融合术后行THA的患者,术中使用改良髋臼前倾角和倾斜角测试系统可获得理想的髋臼杯置入角度。