Li Shuting, Kempe Matthias, Brink Michel, Lemmink Koen
Department of Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Sports Med Open. 2024 May 16;10(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00724-6.
Recovery strategies are used to enhance performance and reduce injury risk in athletes. In previous systematic reviews, individual recovery strategies were investigated to clarify their effectiveness for mixed groups of athletes. However, the current evidence is ambiguous, and a clear overview of (training) recovery for endurance athletes is still lacking.
We conducted an umbrella review based on a literature search in PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science. Reviews published in English and before December 2022 were included. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were eligible if they investigated the effectiveness of one or more recovery strategies compared with a placebo or control group after a training session in endurance athletes.
Twenty-two reviews (nine systematic reviews, three meta-analyses, and ten systematic reviews with meta-analyses included) met the inclusion criteria. In total, sixty-three studies with 1100 endurance athletes were included in our umbrella review. Out of the sixty-three studies, eight provided information on training recovery time frame for data synthesis. Among them, cryotherapy and compression garments showed positive effects, while applying massage showed no effect. In general, none of the included recovery strategies showed consistent benefits for endurance athletes.
There is no particular recovery strategy that can be advised to enhance recovery between training sessions or competitions in endurance athletes. However, individual studies suggest that compression garments and cryotherapy are effective training recovery strategies. Further research should improve methodology and focus on the different time courses of the recovery process.
The review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews with the number CRD42021260509.
恢复策略用于提高运动员的表现并降低受伤风险。在以往的系统评价中,对个体恢复策略进行了研究,以阐明其对混合运动员群体的有效性。然而,目前的证据并不明确,耐力运动员(训练)恢复的清晰概述仍然缺乏。
我们基于在PubMed、Cochrane系统评价数据库和科学网进行的文献检索开展了一项伞状评价。纳入2022年12月之前发表的英文综述。如果系统评价和荟萃分析调查了耐力运动员在一次训练课后与安慰剂或对照组相比一种或多种恢复策略的有效性,则符合纳入标准。
22篇综述(9篇系统评价、3篇荟萃分析以及10篇包含荟萃分析的系统评价)符合纳入标准。我们的伞状评价总共纳入了63项涉及1100名耐力运动员的研究。在这63项研究中,8项提供了关于训练恢复时间框架的信息用于数据合成。其中,冷冻疗法和压缩衣显示出积极效果,而按摩则没有效果。总体而言,纳入的恢复策略中没有一种对耐力运动员显示出一致的益处。
没有特定的恢复策略可以被推荐用于提高耐力运动员训练课之间或比赛期间的恢复。然而,个别研究表明压缩衣和冷冻疗法是有效的训练恢复策略。进一步的研究应改进方法,并关注恢复过程的不同时间进程。
该评价方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库注册,注册号为CRD42021260509。