• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在大流行期间,声誉偏见如何影响信息回忆?

How does prestige bias affect information recall during a pandemic?

机构信息

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Etnobiologia e Conservação da Natureza, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil.

Laboratório de Ecologia e Evolução de Sistemas Socioecológicos, Departamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 May 16;19(5):e0303512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303512. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0303512
PMID:38753598
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11098362/
Abstract

The prestige theory of evolution states that our memory has an intrinsic bias to memorize information from someone of prestige. However, the evidence for information recall is mainly focused on content bias. Considering that the prestige bias can be advantageous in selecting information in contexts of uncertainty, this study assessed whether, in the scenario of the COVID-19 pandemic, the prestige bias would be favored over other models that do not possess the prestige spirit characteristics. The study was conducted through an online experiment, where participants were subjected to reading fictitious text, followed by a surprise recollection. Data were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model, Poisson family, and logistic regression. The results showed that prestige is only prioritized in the recall due to the family model and does not present any difference from the other models tested. However, it influenced the recall of specific information, suggesting its role as a factor of cultural attraction. Furthermore, we observed that trust in science-oriented profiles can influence the recall of information during a health crisis. Finally, this study highlights the complexity of the functioning of the human mind and how several factors can act simultaneously in the recall of information.

摘要

进化的声望理论指出,我们的记忆天生就有一种偏向,会记住有声望之人的信息。然而,有关信息回忆的证据主要集中在内容偏见上。鉴于声望偏见在不确定情况下选择信息时可能具有优势,本研究评估了在 COVID-19 大流行的情况下,声望偏见是否会优先于不具备声望精神特征的其他模型。该研究通过在线实验进行,参与者首先阅读虚构文本,然后进行惊喜回忆。使用广义线性混合模型、泊松家族和逻辑回归对数据进行分析。结果表明,声望仅因家庭模型而在回忆中受到优先考虑,与测试的其他模型没有任何区别。然而,它确实影响了特定信息的回忆,表明其作为文化吸引力因素的作用。此外,我们观察到,对以科学为导向的个人资料的信任可以影响健康危机期间的信息回忆。最后,本研究强调了人类思维运作的复杂性,以及在信息回忆中可能同时存在几种因素的情况。

相似文献

1
How does prestige bias affect information recall during a pandemic?在大流行期间,声誉偏见如何影响信息回忆?
PLoS One. 2024 May 16;19(5):e0303512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303512. eCollection 2024.
2
Does prestige bias influence the recall and transmission of COVID-19-related information? Protocol registration for an experimental study conducted online.权威偏见是否会影响对 COVID-19 相关信息的回忆和传播?一项在线进行的实验研究的方案注册。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 23;18(2):e0281991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281991. eCollection 2023.
3
Memory advantage for untrustworthy faces: Replication across lab- and web-based studies.不可信面孔的记忆优势:实验室和基于网络的研究的重复。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 17;17(2):e0264034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264034. eCollection 2022.
4
Trusting the experts: The domain-specificity of prestige-biased social learning.信任专家:威望偏向的社会学习的领域特异性。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 11;16(8):e0255346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255346. eCollection 2021.
5
Historical narratives about the COVID-19 pandemic are motivationally biased.关于 COVID-19 大流行的历史叙述存在动机偏差。
Nature. 2023 Nov;623(7987):588-593. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06674-5. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
6
The emergence and adaptive use of prestige in an online social learning task.在一项在线社会学习任务中,声望的出现和适应性使用。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 21;10(1):12095. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68982-4.
7
Media trust and infection mitigating behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA.美国 COVID-19 大流行期间的媒体信任与感染缓解行为。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003323.
8
Using the COVID-19 Pandemic to Assess the Influence of News Affect on Online Mental Health-Related Search Behavior Across the United States: Integrated Sentiment Analysis and the Circumplex Model of Affect.利用 COVID-19 大流行评估新闻情绪对美国在线心理健康相关搜索行为的影响:综合情绪分析和情绪的双因素模型。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 27;24(1):e32731. doi: 10.2196/32731.
9
Rise in Use of Digital Mental Health Tools and Technologies in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Survey Study.美国在 COVID-19 大流行期间对数字心理健康工具和技术的使用有所增加:调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 16;23(4):e26994. doi: 10.2196/26994.
10
Psychiatry in the Time of COVID: Credibility, Uncertainty, and Self-Reflection.COVID 时代的精神病学:可信度、不确定性与自我反思。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2021 Nov 1;209(11):779-782. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001404.

本文引用的文献

1
Prestige and content biases together shape the cultural transmission of narratives.声望偏差和内容偏差共同塑造了叙事的文化传播。
Evol Hum Sci. 2021 Jul 29;3:e42. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2021.37. eCollection 2021.
2
Dear Pandemic: A topic modeling analysis of COVID-19 information needs among readers of an online science communication campaign.致大流行:一项关于在线科学传播活动读者对 COVID-19 信息需求的主题建模分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 30;18(3):e0281773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281773. eCollection 2023.
3
Does prestige bias influence the recall and transmission of COVID-19-related information? Protocol registration for an experimental study conducted online.
权威偏见是否会影响对 COVID-19 相关信息的回忆和传播?一项在线进行的实验研究的方案注册。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 23;18(2):e0281991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281991. eCollection 2023.
4
Situational pathogen avoidance mediates the impact of social connectedness on preventive measures during the COVID-19 pandemic.情境病原体回避中介了社会连接对 COVID-19 大流行期间预防措施的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 10;13(1):2418. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29239-y.
5
Family still matters: Human social motivation across 42 countries during a global pandemic.家庭仍然重要:全球大流行期间42个国家的人类社会动机
Evol Hum Behav. 2022 Nov;43(6):527-535. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2022.09.003. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
6
The Emergence of Cultural Attractors: How Dynamic Populations of Learners Achieve Collective Cognitive Alignment.文化吸引子的出现:动态学习者群体如何实现集体认知一致。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Aug;46(8):e13183. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13183.
7
An anchor in troubled times: Trust in science before and within the COVID-19 pandemic.疫情时期的定海神针:新冠疫情之前和期间对科学的信任。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 9;17(2):e0262823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262823. eCollection 2022.
8
Neural systems that facilitate the representation of social rank.促进社会等级表示的神经系统。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Feb 28;377(1845):20200444. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0444. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
9
The Spread of COVID-19 Crisis Communication by German Public Authorities and Experts on Twitter: Quantitative Content Analysis.德国公共当局和专家在 Twitter 上传播 COVID-19 危机信息:定量内容分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Dec 22;7(12):e31834. doi: 10.2196/31834.
10
Trusting the experts: The domain-specificity of prestige-biased social learning.信任专家:威望偏向的社会学习的领域特异性。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 11;16(8):e0255346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255346. eCollection 2021.