• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Taxonomic identity of the strains used to produce food enzymes evaluated in published EFSA opinions.用于生产在欧洲食品安全局（EFSA）已发布意见中评估的食品酶的菌株的分类学身份。
EFSA J. 2024 May 16;22(5):e8770. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8770. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Comparative genomic analysis of Bacillus paralicheniformis MDJK30 with its closely related species reveals an evolutionary relationship between B. paralicheniformis and B. licheniformis.比较巴氏芽胞杆菌 MDJK30 与其近缘种的基因组分析揭示了巴氏芽胞杆菌和地衣芽胞杆菌之间的进化关系。
BMC Genomics. 2019 Apr 11;20(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5646-9.
3
Markers to Rapidly Distinguish From the Very Close Relative, .用于快速区分与其极为相近的亲属的标志物。
Front Microbiol. 2021 Jan 11;11:596828. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.596828. eCollection 2020.
4
Urease Characteristics and Phylogenetic Status of ..的脲酶特性及系统发育地位
J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018 Dec 28;28(12):1992-1998. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1809.09030.
5
Two genes involved in clindamycin resistance of Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus paralicheniformis identified by comparative genomic analysis.通过比较基因组分析鉴定出参与地衣芽孢杆菌和类地衣芽孢杆菌克林霉素抗性的两个基因。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 9;15(4):e0231274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231274. eCollection 2020.
6
In silico exploration of Red Sea Bacillus genomes for natural product biosynthetic gene clusters.红海中芽孢杆菌基因组的天然产物生物合成基因簇的计算机探索。
BMC Genomics. 2018 May 22;19(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4796-5.
7
Putative antibiotic resistance genes present in extant Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus paralicheniformis strains are probably intrinsic and part of the ancient resistome.现存的地衣芽孢杆菌和类地衣芽孢杆菌菌株中存在的假定抗生素抗性基因可能是固有基因，是古老抗性组的一部分。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 15;14(1):e0210363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210363. eCollection 2019.
8
Bacillus paralicheniformis sp. nov., isolated from fermented soybean paste.从发酵豆酱中分离出的新种迟缓芽孢杆菌。
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015 Oct;65(10):3487-3492. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000441.
9
Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of  DSM 5749 and  DSM 5750 (BioPlus® 2B) for piglets, calves for fattening and other growing ruminants (Chr. Hansen A/S).由DSM 5749和DSM 5750（BioPlus® 2B）组成的饲料添加剂对仔猪、育肥牛犊及其他生长反刍动物（科汉森公司）的安全性和有效性。
EFSA J. 2023 Mar 7;21(3):e07859. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7859. eCollection 2023 Mar.
10
Update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 14: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2021.截至2021年3月向欧洲食品安全局（EFSA）通报的有意添加到食品或饲料中的QPS推荐生物制剂清单更新：向EFSA通报的分类单元的适用性
EFSA J. 2021 Jul 7;19(7):e06689. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6689. eCollection 2021 Jul.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Progress and Future Trends of Genomics-Based Techniques for Food Adulteration Identification.基于基因组学的食品掺假鉴定技术的当前进展与未来趋势
Foods. 2025 Mar 24;14(7):1116. doi: 10.3390/foods14071116.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme subtilisin from the non-genetically modified strain NZYM-CX.来自非转基因菌株NZYM-CX的食品酶枯草杆菌蛋白酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Nov 23;21(11):e08406. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8406. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α-amylase from the genetically modified strain NZYM-AC.来自转基因菌株NZYM-AC的食品酶α-淀粉酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Nov 24;21(11):e8393. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8393. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α-amylase from the non-genetically modified strain T74.非转基因菌株T74来源的食品酶α-淀粉酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Aug 2;21(8):e08160. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8160. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Update of the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) recommended microbiological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 17: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2022.作为向欧洲食品安全局（EFSA）通报的有意添加到食品或饲料中的合格安全推定（QPS）推荐微生物制剂清单的更新：截至2022年9月向EFSA通报的分类单元的适用性。
EFSA J. 2023 Jan 25;21(1):e07746. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7746. eCollection 2023 Jan.
5
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme phosphoinositide phospholipase C from the genetically modified strain NZYM-DI.来自转基因菌株NZYM-DI的食品酶磷酸肌醇磷脂酶C的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2022 Aug 8;20(8):e07470. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7470. eCollection 2022 Aug.
6
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme glucan 1,4-α-maltohydrolase from the genetically modified strain NZYM-FR.来自转基因菌株NZYM-FR的食品酶葡聚糖1,4-α-麦芽水解酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2022 Jun 15;20(6):e07367. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7367. eCollection 2022 Jun.
7
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme glucan 1,4-α-maltohydrolase from the genetically modified strain NZYM-CY.来自转基因菌株NZYM-CY的食品酶1,4-α-葡聚糖麦芽水解酶的安全性评估
EFSA J. 2022 Jun 16;20(6):e07366. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7366. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme glucan 1,4-α-maltohydrolase from the genetically modified strain NZYM-SD.来自转基因菌株NZYM-SD的食品酶葡聚糖1,4-α-麦芽糖水解酶的安全性评估
EFSA J. 2022 Jun 15;20(6):e07368. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7368. eCollection 2022 Jun.
9
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme pullulanase from the genetically modified strain NZYM-LU.来自转基因菌株NZYM-LU的食品酶支链淀粉酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2022 Jun 14;20(6):e07359. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7359. eCollection 2022 Jun.
10
Update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 15: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2021.向欧洲食品安全局（EFSA）通报的有意添加到食品或饲料中的QPS推荐生物制剂清单更新15：截至2021年9月向EFSA通报的分类单元的适用性
EFSA J. 2022 Jan 27;20(1):e07045. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7045. eCollection 2022 Jan.

用于生产在欧洲食品安全局（EFSA）已发布意见中评估的食品酶的菌株的分类学身份。

Taxonomic identity of the strains used to produce food enzymes evaluated in published EFSA opinions.

作者信息

Barat Baviera José Manuel, Bolognesi Claudia, Chesson Andrew, Cocconcelli Pier Sandro, Crebelli Riccardo, Gott David Michael, Grob Konrad, Lambré Claude, Lampi Evgenia, Mengelers Marcel, Mortensen Alicja, Rivière Gilles, Steffensen Inger-Lise, Tlustos Christina, Van Loveren Henk, Vernis Laurence, Zorn Holger, Herman Lieve, Aguilera Jaime, Gomes Ana, Lunardi Simone, Liu Yi, Marini Eleonora, Peluso Silvia

出版信息

EFSA J. 2024 May 16;22(5):e8770. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8770. eCollection 2024 May.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8770
PMID:38756348
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11096999/
Abstract

, a species known to produce the antimicrobial bacitracin, could be misidentified as , depending on the identification method used. For this reason, the European Commission requested EFSA to review the taxonomic identification of formerly assessed production strains. Following this request, EFSA retrieved the raw data from 27 technical dossiers submitted and found that the taxonomic identification was established by 16S rRNA gene analyses for 15 strains and by whole genome sequence analysis for 12 strains. As a conclusion, only these 12 strains could be unambiguously identified as .

摘要

一种已知能产生抗菌杆菌肽的物种，根据所使用的鉴定方法，可能会被误鉴定为 。因此，欧盟委员会要求欧洲食品安全局（EFSA）审查先前评估的 生产菌株的分类鉴定。根据这一要求，EFSA从提交的27份技术档案中检索了原始数据，发现15株菌株的分类鉴定是通过16S rRNA基因分析确定的，12株菌株是通过全基因组序列分析确定的。结论是，只有这12株菌株能够明确鉴定为 。