• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evolving availability and standardization of patient attributes for matching.用于匹配的患者属性的可用性不断发展和标准化。
Health Aff Sch. 2023 Oct 12;1(4):qxad047. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad047. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
The Building Blocks of Interoperability. A Multisite Analysis of Patient Demographic Attributes Available for Matching.互操作性的构建要素。对可用于匹配的患者人口统计学属性的多中心分析。
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Apr 5;8(2):322-336. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-11-RA-0196.
3
Evaluating the effect of data standardization and validation on patient matching accuracy.评估数据标准化和验证对患者匹配准确性的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 May 1;26(5):447-456. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy191.
4
Comparing record linkage software programs and algorithms using real-world data.使用真实世界的数据比较记录链接软件程序和算法。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 24;14(9):e0221459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221459. eCollection 2019.
5
Health care delivery reorganization innovative outcome: universal computerized patient identification.医疗服务重组的创新成果:通用计算机化患者识别。
Medinfo. 1995;8 Pt 2:1637.
6
De-identified Bayesian personal identity matching for privacy-preserving record linkage despite errors: development and validation.去标识化贝叶斯个人身份匹配用于隐私保护记录链接,即使存在错误:开发和验证。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 May 5;23(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02176-6.
7
Accuracy of EMS-recorded patient demographic data.急救医疗服务记录的患者人口统计学数据的准确性。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008 Apr-Jun;12(2):187-91. doi: 10.1080/10903120801907687.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Measuring the Degree of Unmatched Patient Records in a Health Information Exchange Using Exact Matching.使用精确匹配来测量健康信息交换中不匹配患者记录的程度。
Appl Clin Inform. 2016 May 11;7(2):330-40. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2015-11-RA-0158. eCollection 2016.
10
Linkage of the ACR National Mammography Database to the Network of State Cancer Registries: Proof of Concept Evaluation by the ACR National Mammography Database Committee.ACR 国家乳腺数据库与州癌症登记处网络的链接:ACR 国家乳腺数据库委员会的概念验证评估。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Jan;16(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.06.027. Epub 2018 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Data linkage multiplies research insights across diverse healthcare sectors.数据关联可成倍增加跨不同医疗保健领域的研究见解。
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Mar 4;5(1):58. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00769-y.

本文引用的文献

1
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
2
Evaluating the effect of data standardization and validation on patient matching accuracy.评估数据标准化和验证对患者匹配准确性的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 May 1;26(5):447-456. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy191.
3
The Building Blocks of Interoperability. A Multisite Analysis of Patient Demographic Attributes Available for Matching.互操作性的构建要素。对可用于匹配的患者人口统计学属性的多中心分析。
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Apr 5;8(2):322-336. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-11-RA-0196.
4
A naturalistic patient matching algorithm: Derivation and validation.一种自然主义患者匹配算法:推导与验证
Health Informatics J. 2016 Dec;22(4):1030-1044. doi: 10.1177/1460458215607080. Epub 2015 Oct 11.
5
A benchmark comparison of deterministic and probabilistic methods for defining manual review datasets in duplicate records reconciliation.在重复记录核对中定义人工审核数据集的确定性方法和概率性方法的基准比较。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):97-104. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001744. Epub 2013 May 23.

用于匹配的患者属性的可用性不断发展和标准化。

Evolving availability and standardization of patient attributes for matching.

作者信息

Deng Yu, Gleason Lacey P, Culbertson Adam, Chen Xiaotian, Bernstam Elmer V, Cullen Theresa, Gouripeddi Ramkiran, Harle Christopher, Hesse David F, Kean Jacob, Lee John, Magoc Tanja, Meeker Daniella, Ong Toan, Pathak Jyotishman, Rosenman Marc, Rusie Laura K, Shah Akash J, Shi Lizheng, Thomas Aaron, Trick William E, Grannis Shaun, Kho Abel

机构信息

Center for Health Information Partnerships, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, United States.

Statistical Innovation Group, Data and Statistical Sciences, AbbVie, Inc, North Chicago, IL 60064, United States.

出版信息

Health Aff Sch. 2023 Oct 12;1(4):qxad047. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad047. eCollection 2023 Oct.

DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxad047
PMID:38756741
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10986191/
Abstract

Variation in availability, format, and standardization of patient attributes across health care organizations impacts patient-matching performance. We report on the changing nature of patient-matching features available from 2010-2020 across diverse care settings. We asked 38 health care provider organizations about their current patient attribute data-collection practices. All sites collected name, date of birth (DOB), address, and phone number. Name, DOB, current address, social security number (SSN), sex, and phone number were most commonly used for cross-provider patient matching. Electronic health record queries for a subset of 20 participating sites revealed that DOB, first name, last name, city, and postal codes were highly available (>90%) across health care organizations and time. SSN declined slightly in the last years of the study period. Birth sex, gender identity, language, country full name, country abbreviation, health insurance number, ethnicity, cell phone number, email address, and weight increased over 50% from 2010 to 2020. Understanding the wide variation in available patient attributes across care settings in the United States can guide selection and standardization efforts for improved patient matching in the United States.

摘要

医疗保健机构之间患者属性的可用性、格式和标准化差异会影响患者匹配性能。我们报告了2010年至2020年期间不同护理环境中可用的患者匹配特征的变化性质。我们询问了38家医疗保健机构关于其当前患者属性数据收集做法的情况。所有机构都收集姓名、出生日期(DOB)、地址和电话号码。姓名、DOB、当前地址、社会安全号码(SSN)、性别和电话号码最常用于跨机构患者匹配。对20个参与机构的子集进行的电子健康记录查询显示,DOB、名字、姓氏、城市和邮政编码在各医疗保健机构和不同时期的可用性都很高(>90%)。在研究期的最后几年,SSN的可用性略有下降。从2010年到2020年,出生性别、性别认同、语言、国家全称、国家缩写、健康保险号码、种族、手机号码、电子邮件地址和体重的可用性增加了50%以上。了解美国不同护理环境中可用患者属性的广泛差异,可以指导在美国进行改进患者匹配的选择和标准化工作。