• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

催化严谨研究拥护者社群。

Catalyzing communities of research rigour champions.

作者信息

Brumback Audrey C, Ngiam William X Q, Lapato Dana M, Allison David B, Daniels Christin L, Dougherty Michael, Hazlett Haley F, Kerr Kara L, Pusek Susan, Schrag Naomi

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, TX 78712, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, TX 78712, USA.

出版信息

Brain Commun. 2024 Apr 9;6(3):fcae120. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae120. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1093/braincomms/fcae120
PMID:38764774
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11099651/
Abstract

The biomedical sciences must maintain and enhance a research culture that prioritizes rigour and transparency. The US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke convened a workshop entitled 'Catalyzing Communities of Research Rigor Champions' that brought together a diverse group of leaders in promoting research rigour and transparency (identified as 'rigour champions') to discuss strategies, barriers and resources for catalyzing technical, cultural and educational changes in the biomedical sciences. This article summarizes 2 days of panels and discussions and provides an overview of critical barriers to research rigour, perspectives behind reform initiatives and considerations for stakeholders across science. Additionally, we describe applications of network science to foster, maintain and expand cultural changes related to scientific rigour and opportunities to embed rigourous practices into didactic courses, training experiences and degree programme requirements. We hope this piece provides a primer for the wider research community on current discussions and actions and inspires individuals to build, join or expand collaborative networks within their own institutions that prioritize rigourous research practices.

摘要

生物医学科学必须维持并强化一种将严谨性和透明度置于优先地位的研究文化。美国国立神经疾病和中风研究所举办了一场名为“催化严谨研究倡导者社群”的研讨会,汇聚了一群在促进研究严谨性和透明度方面的不同领导者(被称为“严谨倡导者”),以讨论在生物医学科学中催化技术、文化和教育变革的策略、障碍及资源。本文总结了为期两天的小组讨论情况,概述了研究严谨性的关键障碍、改革倡议背后的观点以及科学界各利益相关者的考量因素。此外,我们还描述了网络科学在促进、维持和扩大与科学严谨性相关的文化变革方面的应用,以及将严谨实践融入教学课程、培训经历和学位项目要求的机会。我们希望这篇文章能为更广泛的研究群体提供关于当前讨论和行动的入门介绍,并激励个人在自己的机构内建立、加入或扩大以严谨研究实践为优先的合作网络。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56c4/11099651/e55b0934ecd4/fcae120f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56c4/11099651/e55b0934ecd4/fcae120f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56c4/11099651/e55b0934ecd4/fcae120f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Catalyzing communities of research rigour champions.催化严谨研究拥护者社群。
Brain Commun. 2024 Apr 9;6(3):fcae120. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae120. eCollection 2024.
2
Journals Operating Predatory Practices Are Systematically Eroding the Science Ethos: A Gate and Code Strategy to Minimise Their Operating Space and Restore Research Best Practice.采用掠夺性做法的期刊正在系统性地侵蚀科学精神:一种减少其运营空间并恢复研究最佳实践的把关与编码策略。
Microb Biotechnol. 2025 Jun;18(6):e70180. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.70180.
3
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
4
An Occupational Science Contribution to Camouflaging Scholarship: Centering Intersectional Experiences of Occupational Disruptions.职业科学对伪装学术的贡献:以职业中断的交叉经历为中心
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):238-248. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0070. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Hail Lifestyle Medicine consensus position statement as a medical specialty: Middle Eastern perspective.欢呼将生活方式医学作为一门医学专业的共识立场声明:中东视角。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 20;13:1455871. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1455871. eCollection 2025.
6
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis.实施非专业卫生工作者项目以改善孕产妇和儿童健康服务可及性的障碍与促进因素:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 8;2013(10):CD010414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010414.pub2.
7
Understanding Barriers to Engagement With a Prostate Cancer Research and Genetic Risk Service Among UK Men of Black African or Black Caribbean Ancestry.了解英国非洲裔或加勒比裔黑人男性参与前列腺癌研究和遗传风险服务的障碍。
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70282. doi: 10.1111/hex.70282.
8
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
9
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
The past, present and future of Registered Reports.注册报告的过去、现在与未来。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Jan;6(1):29-42. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01193-7. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
2
Creating SPACE to evolve academic assessment.为学术评估的演进创造空间。
Elife. 2021 Sep 23;10:e70929. doi: 10.7554/eLife.70929.
3
Misinformation in and about science.科学中的错误信息和围绕科学的错误信息。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 13;118(15). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912444117.
4
Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing.使用 CRediT 和 tenzing 记录学术文章的贡献。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244611. eCollection 2020.
5
Changing how we evaluate research is difficult, but not impossible.改变我们评估研究的方式是困难的,但并非不可能。
Elife. 2020 Aug 12;9:e58654. doi: 10.7554/eLife.58654.
6
Estimation for Better Inference in Neuroscience.神经科学中更好推断的估计。
eNeuro. 2019 Aug 1;6(4). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0205-19.2019. eCollection 2019 Jul-Aug.
7
Making Research Evaluation More Transparent: Aligning Research Philosophy, Institutional Values, and Reporting.使研究评估更加透明:使研究理念、机构价值观和报告保持一致。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 May;14(3):361-375. doi: 10.1177/1745691618810693. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
8
Step up for quality research.推动高质量研究。
Science. 2017 Aug 11;357(6351):531. doi: 10.1126/science.aan0859.
9
Shake up conferences.震撼会议。
Nature. 2017 Aug 9;548(7666):153-154. doi: 10.1038/548153a.
10
Number needed to eat: pizza and resident conference attendance.进食所需数量:披萨与住院医师会议出席情况。
Med Educ. 2016 Dec;50(12):1204-1207. doi: 10.1111/medu.13080.