Faculty of Sports Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Department of Radiology, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Int J Sports Med. 2024 Oct;45(11):844-850. doi: 10.1055/a-2330-3001. Epub 2024 May 20.
This study aimed to determine whether the optimal minimal velocity threshold (MVT) provides more precise estimates of one-repetition maximum (1RM) in the hexagonal barbell deadlift (HBD) than the general and individual MVTs. The 1RMs of 27 resistance-trained males were predicted using three types of MVT: (i) averaged across subjects' velocity of the 1RM trial (0.25 m·s), (ii) velocity attained during the 1RM trial, and (iii) MVT that eliminated the differences between the actual and predicted 1RM. Two individual load-velocity relationships were modelled considering five (30-50-70-80%1RM) or six (30-50-70-80-90%1RM) loading conditions. Negligible differences (Effect size<0.20), low absolute errors (<5% of the actual 1RM), and extremely high correlations (>0.90) were observed between the actual and six predicted 1RMs. The only significant difference was the lower raw errors for the 90%1RM condition (0.60±7.34 kg) compared to the 80%1RM condition (2.27±7.54 kg; =0.013). These results suggest that the individual load-velocity relationship offers an accurate estimation of the HBD 1RM in resistance-trained males, and these estimates could maintain similar levels of precision across different types of MVT (general, individual, and optimal) and final tested loads (80%1RM and 90%1RM).
本研究旨在确定最佳最小速度阈值(MVT)是否比一般和个体 MVT 更能精确估计六角杠铃硬拉(HBD)的 1 次重复最大重量(1RM)。使用三种类型的 MVT 预测了 27 名阻力训练男性的 1RM:(i)平均受试者 1RM 试验的速度(0.25 m·s),(ii)在 1RM 试验中达到的速度,和(iii)消除实际和预测 1RM 之间差异的 MVT。考虑到五种(30-50-70-80%1RM)或六种(30-50-70-80-90%1RM)加载条件,分别建立了两个个体负载-速度关系模型。实际和六个预测的 1RM 之间观察到微不足道的差异(效应大小<0.20),绝对误差低(<实际 1RM 的 5%),相关性极高(>0.90)。唯一的显著差异是 90%1RM 条件(0.60±7.34 kg)的原始误差低于 80%1RM 条件(2.27±7.54 kg;=0.013)。这些结果表明,个体负载-速度关系可以准确估计阻力训练男性的 HBD 1RM,并且这些估计可以在不同类型的 MVT(通用、个体和最佳)和最终测试负载(80%1RM 和 90%1RM)之间保持相似的精度水平。