• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作能力有限者的可持续就业能力:一份问卷的参与式开发与验证

Sustainable Employability of People with Limited Capability for Work: The Participatory Development and Validation of a Questionnaire.

作者信息

Hiemstra S R, Fleuren B P I, de Jonge A, Naaldenberg J, Vaandrager L

机构信息

Health & Society, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Occup Rehabil. 2025 Mar;35(1):105-115. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10191-1. Epub 2024 May 20.

DOI:10.1007/s10926-024-10191-1
PMID:38769241
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11839800/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Understanding sustainable employability (SE) of people with limited capability for work (LCW) due to physical or mental disability is crucial for the sustainable participation of this target group. Therefore, adequate measurement instruments for SE are needed. This study aims to validate a questionnaire to measure SE among people with LCW using a participatory approach, including person-job fit (PJ fit) and work-related sense of coherence (Work-SoC).

METHODS

Existing scales for the main concepts were tested and adapted for face validity via cognitive interviews (n = 6), with the involvement of a co-researcher with LCW in the research team. Next, the questionnaire was administered among people with LCW (n = 248) to assess its factor structure (Confirmatory Factor Analysis) and reliability (Cronbach's alpha).

RESULTS

Analysis of the cognitive interviews identified problems with clarity and readability of items, instructions and response categories of used (existing) scales. The main adjustments concerned the shortening of text length, the usage of familiar language and examples, and the addition of an introduction game. Most of the adapted SE indicator scales showed an overall good fit and acceptable-to-good internal reliability. The overall SE model had an overall good fit, and excluding 'internal employability' further improved this fit. PJ fit and Work-SoC had an acceptable/good model fit and internal consistency.

CONCLUSION

The participatory validation process resulted in a validated and comprehensive questionnaire to measure SE, PJ fit and Work-SoC among people with LCW, which enables research into the development of their SE. This questionnaire can be utilised to contribute to a more inclusive labour market.

摘要

目的

了解因身体或精神残疾而工作能力有限的人群的可持续就业能力,对于该目标群体的可持续参与至关重要。因此,需要有足够的可持续就业能力测量工具。本研究旨在采用参与式方法验证一份问卷,以测量工作能力有限人群的可持续就业能力,包括人岗匹配度(PJ匹配度)和与工作相关的连贯感(工作连贯感)。

方法

对主要概念的现有量表进行测试,并通过认知访谈(n = 6)对其进行调整以确保表面效度,研究团队中有一名工作能力有限的共同研究者参与其中。接下来,对工作能力有限的人群(n = 248)进行问卷调查,以评估其因子结构(验证性因子分析)和信度(克朗巴哈系数)。

结果

认知访谈分析发现,所用(现有)量表的项目、说明和回答类别在清晰度和可读性方面存在问题。主要调整包括缩短文本长度、使用通俗易懂的语言和示例,以及增加一个介绍游戏。大多数经过调整的可持续就业能力指标量表总体拟合良好,内部信度可接受至良好。总体可持续就业能力模型总体拟合良好,排除“内部就业能力”后拟合度进一步提高。PJ匹配度和工作连贯感具有可接受/良好的模型拟合度和内部一致性。

结论

参与式验证过程产生了一份经过验证的综合问卷,用于测量工作能力有限人群的可持续就业能力、PJ匹配度和工作连贯感,这有助于研究他们可持续就业能力的发展。该问卷可用于促进劳动力市场更具包容性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a696/11839800/283d37a2981a/10926_2024_10191_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a696/11839800/283d37a2981a/10926_2024_10191_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a696/11839800/283d37a2981a/10926_2024_10191_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Sustainable Employability of People with Limited Capability for Work: The Participatory Development and Validation of a Questionnaire.工作能力有限者的可持续就业能力:一份问卷的参与式开发与验证
J Occup Rehabil. 2025 Mar;35(1):105-115. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10191-1. Epub 2024 May 20.
2
Critical reflections on the currently leading definition of sustainable employability.对当前可持续就业能力主导定义的批判性反思。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 Jun 1;42(6):557-560. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3585. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
3
Salutogenic mechanisms in nature-based work: fostering sense of coherence for employees with limited capability for work.基于自然的工作中的健康促进机制:为工作能力有限的员工培养归属感。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Oct 1;39(5). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae127.
4
Tapping the Employee Perspective on the Improvement of Sustainable Employability (SE): Validation of the MAastricht Instrument for SE (MAISE-NL).挖掘员工视角对可持续就业能力(SE)提升的作用:可持续就业能力测量工具(MAISE-NL)的验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 25;17(7):2211. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072211.
5
The Development of an Instrument to Measure the Work Capability of People with Limited Work Capacity (LWC).一种衡量有限工作能力人群工作能力的工具的开发。
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Mar;29(1):163-174. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9774-x.
6
Validation of the MAastricht Instrument of Sustainable Employability (MAISE-NL) Adapted for Employees in Low-Skilled Jobs (MAISE-Easy).验证适用于低技能工作员工的 MAastricht 可持续就业能力工具(MAISE-NL)(MAISE-Easy)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 29;19(13):7977. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137977.
7
Measuring sustainable employability: psychometric properties of the capability set for work questionnaire.衡量可持续就业能力:工作能力套件问卷的心理测量特性。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 14;22(1):1184. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13609-8.
8
Validity and reliability of the Polish adaptation of the work-related sense of coherence scale.工作相关的领悟社会控制感量表的波兰语适应性的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Nov 14;12(1):659. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02175-w.
9
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
10
Development of a Vitality Scan related to workers' sustainable employability: a study assessing its internal consistency and construct validity.与工人可持续就业能力相关的活力扫描的开发:一项评估其内部一致性和结构效度的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jun 16;15:551. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1894-z.

引用本文的文献

1
The mental-health patient-activation measure: assessing validity, reliability, and responsiveness in outpatient settings.心理健康患者激活量表:评估门诊环境中的效度、信度和反应性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 May 22;25(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06939-5.
2
Salutogenic mechanisms in nature-based work: fostering sense of coherence for employees with limited capability for work.基于自然的工作中的健康促进机制:为工作能力有限的员工培养归属感。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Oct 1;39(5). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae127.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient and Public Involvement in Occupational Therapy Health Research: A Scoping Review.患者和公众参与职业治疗健康研究:范围综述。
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2023 Jan;43(1):119-126. doi: 10.1177/15394492221096058. Epub 2022 May 13.
2
Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the 9-Item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale in a Multi-Occupational Female Sample: A Cross-Sectional Study.多职业女性样本中9项乌得勒支工作投入量表的探索性和验证性因素分析:一项横断面研究
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 6;10:2771. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02771. eCollection 2019.
3
"Constructing a health assessment questionnaire for people with intellectual disabilities: A cognitive interview study".
构建智障人士健康评估问卷:认知访谈研究。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020 May;33(3):345-353. doi: 10.1111/jar.12676. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
4
A scoping review: The utility of participatory research approaches in psychology.参与式研究方法在心理学中的应用:范围综述
J Community Psychol. 2019 Nov;47(8):1865-1892. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22231. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
5
Work Motivation and Employment Outcomes in People with Severe Mental Illness.严重精神疾病患者的工作动机和就业结果。
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Dec;29(4):803-809. doi: 10.1007/s10926-019-09839-0.
6
Handling the reflective-formative measurement conundrum: a practical illustration based on sustainable employability.处理反思-形成性测量难题:基于可持续就业能力的实际说明。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Nov;103:71-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
7
Self-reported measures in health research for people with intellectual disabilities: an inclusive pilot study on suitability and reliability.智力障碍人群健康研究中的自我报告测量工具:一项关于适用性和可靠性的包容性试点研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jul 16;18(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0539-1.
8
"… but if you're afraid of things, how are you meant to belong?" What belonging means to people with intellectual disabilities?“……但如果你害怕一些事情,你又怎么能有归属感呢?”归属感对智障人士意味着什么?
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Nov;31(6):1091-1102. doi: 10.1111/jar.12469. Epub 2018 May 15.
9
A consensus statement on how to conduct inclusive health research.关于如何开展包容性健康研究的共识声明。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2019 Jan;63(1):1-11. doi: 10.1111/jir.12486. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
10
The added value of inclusive research.包容性研究的附加值。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Sep;31(5):751-759. doi: 10.1111/jar.12431. Epub 2017 Dec 12.