Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University.
Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut.
Cogn Sci. 2024 May;48(5):e13449. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13449.
We recently reported strong, replicable (i.e., replicated) evidence for lexically mediated compensation for coarticulation (LCfC; Luthra et al., 2021), whereby lexical knowledge influences a prelexical process. Critically, evidence for LCfC provides robust support for interactive models of cognition that include top-down feedback and is inconsistent with autonomous models that allow only feedforward processing. McQueen, Jesse, and Mitterer (2023) offer five counter-arguments against our interpretation; we respond to each of those arguments here and conclude that top-down feedback provides the most parsimonious explanation of extant data.
我们最近报道了强有力的、可重复的（即复制）证据，证明了词汇介导的协同发音补偿（LCfC；Luthra 等人，2021 年），即词汇知识影响了一个预词汇过程。至关重要的是，LCfC 的证据为包括自上而下反馈的认知交互模型提供了有力支持，并且与只允许前馈处理的自主模型不一致。McQueen、Jesse 和 Mitterer（2023 年）提出了五个反对我们解释的反驳论点；我们在这里回应了每一个论点，并得出结论，自上而下的反馈提供了对现有数据的最简约解释。
