Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052809. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
Several studies have proposed that the microbiological quality of the air in operating theatres be indirectly evaluated by means of particle counting, a technique derived from industrial clean-room technology standards, using airborne particle concentration as an index of microbial contamination. However, the relationship between particle counting and microbiological sampling has rarely been evaluated and demonstrated in operating theatres. The aim of the present study was to determine whether particle counting could predict microbiological contamination of the air in an operating theatre during 95 surgical arthroplasty procedures. This investigation was carried out over a period of three months in 2010 in an orthopedic operating theatre devoted exclusively to prosthetic surgery. During each procedure, the bacterial contamination of the air was determined by means of active sampling; at the same time, airborne particulate contamination was assessed throughout the entire procedure. On considering the total number of surgical operations, the mean value of the total bacterial load in the center of the operating theatre proved to be 35 CFU/m(3); the mean particle count was 4,194,569 no./m(3) for particles of diameter ≥0.5 µm and 13,519 no./m(3) for particles of diameter ≥5 µm. No significant differences emerged between the median values of the airborne microbial load recorded during the two types of procedure monitored. Particulates with a diameter of ≥0.5 µm were detected in statistically higher concentrations (p<0.001) during knee-replacement procedures. By contrast, particulates with a diameter of ≥5 µm displayed a statistically higher concentration during hip-replacement procedures (p<0.05). The results did not reveal any statistically significant correlation between microbial loads and particle counts for either of the particle diameters considered (≥0.5 µm and ≥5 µm). Consequently, microbiological monitoring remains the most suitable method of evaluating the quality of air in operating theatres.
已有多项研究提出,可采用空气粒子计数的方法,间接评估手术室的空气微生物质量。该方法源自工业洁净室技术标准,以空气中粒子浓度作为微生物污染的指标。然而,在手术室中,粒子计数与微生物采样之间的关系很少被评估和验证。本研究旨在确定在 95 例关节置换手术期间,粒子计数是否可预测手术室空气中的微生物污染。本研究于 2010 年在一家专门从事关节置换手术的骨科手术室进行,为期三个月。在每次手术中,通过主动采样来确定空气中的细菌污染情况;同时,在整个手术过程中评估空气中的颗粒污染情况。考虑到手术总数,手术室中心的总细菌负荷平均值为 35 CFU/m(3);空气中的粒子计数,粒径≥0.5 µm 的粒子为 4,194,569 个/m(3),粒径≥5 µm 的粒子为 13,519 个/m(3)。在监测的两种手术类型中,记录的空气中微生物负荷的中位数之间没有出现显著差异。在膝关节置换手术中,检测到粒径≥0.5 µm 的粒子浓度明显更高(p<0.001)。相比之下,在髋关节置换手术中,粒径≥5 µm 的粒子浓度更高(p<0.05)。结果表明,对于所考虑的两种粒径(≥0.5 µm 和≥5 µm),微生物负荷与粒子计数之间均未显示出任何统计学显著相关性。因此,微生物监测仍然是评估手术室空气质量的最适宜方法。