Maj M
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1985 Dec;72(6):542-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1985.tb02652.x.
Four samples of patients (fulfilling at the index episode, respectively, Research Diagnostic Criteria for schizoaffective disorder manic type, schizoaffective disorder depressed type, manic disorder and major depressive disorder) were followed up for 3 years. At the end of the follow-up period, no significant difference with respect to the mean scores on the Disability Assessment Schedule (DAS) and on the Strauss-Carpenter Outcome Scale was observed between schizomanics and manics (although the global outcome was slightly poorer in the former group). In contrast, significant differences between schizodepressives and depressives were found both on some DAS subscales (the schizodepressives were more socially withdrawn, had less social contacts and poorer work performance) and on the Strauss-Carpenter Outcome Scale (the mean total score and the mean scores on the items "social contacts" and "employment" were significantly lower in schizodepressives). The most frequent pattern of course in patients diagnosed cross-sectionally as schizomanic was a bipolar one. Some patients had only recurrent schizomanic episodes and others more an alternance of schizomanic and schizophrenic episodes. In patients diagnosed cross-sectionally as schizodepressives, the most frequent pattern of course was that characterized by recurrent schizodepressive episodes. In some patients an alternance of schizodepressive and depressive or schizodepressive and schizophrenic episodes was observed. These data confirm that patients diagnosed cross-sectionally as schizoaffective represent a very heterogeneous group when they are studied longitudinally, and support the usefulness of a "multiaxial" approach to the classification of schizoaffective disorders, taking into account both cross-sectional symptomatology and clinical course.
对四组患者样本(分别符合分裂情感性障碍躁狂型、分裂情感性障碍抑郁型、躁狂症和重度抑郁症的研究诊断标准)进行了3年的随访。随访期结束时,分裂躁狂症患者和躁狂症患者在残疾评估量表(DAS)和施特劳斯 - 卡彭特结局量表上的平均得分没有显著差异(尽管前一组的总体结局略差)。相比之下,在一些DAS子量表上(分裂抑郁症患者社交退缩更明显、社交接触更少且工作表现更差)以及施特劳斯 - 卡彭特结局量表上(分裂抑郁症患者的平均总分以及“社交接触”和“就业”项目的平均得分显著更低),发现分裂抑郁症患者和抑郁症患者之间存在显著差异。横断面诊断为分裂躁狂症的患者中,最常见的病程模式是双相型。一些患者只有复发性的分裂躁狂发作,另一些患者则更多地是分裂躁狂发作与精神分裂症发作交替出现。在横断面诊断为分裂抑郁症的患者中,最常见的病程模式是以复发性分裂抑郁发作为特征。在一些患者中,观察到分裂抑郁发作与抑郁发作或分裂抑郁发作与精神分裂症发作交替出现。这些数据证实,横断面诊断为分裂情感性障碍的患者在纵向研究时代表一个非常异质性的群体,并支持采用“多轴”方法对分裂情感性障碍进行分类,同时考虑横断面症状学和临床病程。