Suppr超能文献

双相情感障碍和单相情感障碍存在不同但数量众多的类别这一概念。三、双相情感障碍与单相情感障碍的比较。

The concept of distinct but voluminous groups of bipolar and unipolar diseases. III. Bipolar and unipolar comparison.

作者信息

Marneros A, Deister A, Rohde A

机构信息

Psychiatric Department, University of Bonn, Federal Republic of Germany.

出版信息

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1990;240(2):90-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02189977.

Abstract

Comparing unipolar diseases (n = 121) as one group with bipolar diseases (n = 86) as another group (both groups including affective and schizoaffective disorders) relevant differences were found in sex distribution, age at onset, premorbid personality, long-term course and some aspects of long-term outcome. Although building two voluminous groups of "unipolar diseases" and "bipolar diseases" runs some risk of inhomogeneity, this danger could perhaps be limited by referring to the "affective subtype" and the "schizoaffective subtype".

摘要

将单极性疾病组(n = 121)与双极性疾病组(n = 86)进行比较(两组均包括情感性和分裂情感性障碍),发现在性别分布、发病年龄、病前人格、病程以及长期转归的某些方面存在相关差异。尽管构建庞大的“单极性疾病”和“双极性疾病”两组存在一定的异质性风险,但通过提及“情感亚型”和“分裂情感亚型”,这种风险或许可以得到限制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验